Role of Tet1 in erasure of genomic imprinting

Nature

Volumn 504, Issue 7480, 2013, Pages 460-464

  Yamaguchi, Shinpei ^a   Shen, Li ^a   Liu, Yuting ^a   Sendler, Damian ^a   Zhang, Yi ^a,b,c  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; PEG10 PROTEIN; PEG3 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RNA; TET1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; CYTOLOGY; GENOME; GENOMICS; RNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL METHYLATED REGION; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION SYSTEM; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOME IMPRINTING; GENOTYPE; GERM LINE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; MATING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PEG10 GENE; PEG3 GENE; PLACENTA DEVELOPMENT; POSTNATAL GROWTH; PRIMORDIAL GERM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; RNA SEQUENCE; SPERM; TET1 GENE; WILD TYPE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DIOXYGENASES; DNA METHYLATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYO LOSS; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; GENOTYPE; GERM CELLS; MALE; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; SPERMATOZOA;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84890568163     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12805     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartolomei, M. S. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a002592 (2011).
2. Li, Y. & Sasaki, H. Genomic imprinting in mammals: its life cycle, molecular mechanisms and reprogramming. Cell Res. 21, 466-473 (2011).
3. Kaneda, M. et al. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 429, 900-903 (2004).
4. Ito, S. et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466, 1129-1133 (2010).
5. Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930-935 (2009).
6. Shen, L. & Zhang, Y. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: generation, fate, and genomic distribution. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 289-296 (2013).
7. Yamaguchi, S. et al. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 492, 443-447 (2012).
8. Nelissen, E. C. M. , van Montfoort, A. P. A. , Dumoulin, J. C. M. & Evers, J. L. H. Epigenetics and the placenta. Hum. Reprod. Update 17, 397-417 (2011).
9. Ono, R. et al. Deletion of Peg10, an imprinted gene acquired from a retrotransposon, causes early embryonic lethality. Nature Genet. 38, 101-106 (2006).
10. Ono, R. et al. Identification of a large novel imprinted gene cluster on mouse proximal chromosome 6. Genome Res. 13, 1696-1705 (2003).
11. Hackett, J. A. et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339, 448-452 (2013).
12. Kagiwada, S. , Kurimoto, K. , Hirota, T. , Yamaji, M. & Saitou, M. Replication-coupled passive DNA demethylation for the erasure of genome imprints in mice. EMBO J. 32, 340-353 (2013).
13. Yamaguchi, S. et al. Dynamics of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine during germ cell reprogramming. Cell Res. 23, 329-339 (2013).
14. Seisenberger, S. et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell 48, 849-862 (2012).
15. Kobayashi, H. et al. High-resolution DNA methylome analysis of primordial germ cells identifies gender-specific reprogramming in mice. Genome Res. 23,616-662 (2013).
16. Dawlaty, M. M. et al. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev. Cell 24, 310-323 (2013).
17. Dawlaty, M. M. et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible withembryonic andpostnatal development. Cell StemCell 9,166-175 (2011).
18. Cortellino, S. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell 146, 67-79 (2011).
19. Popp, C. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463, 1101-1105 (2010).
20. Piccolo, F. M. et al. Different roles for Tet1 and Tet2 proteins in reprogrammingmediated erasure of imprints induced by EGC fusion. Mol. Cell 49, 1023-1033 (2013).
21. Kobayashi, H. et al. Bisulfite sequencing and dinucleotide content analysis of 15 imprintedmouse differentiallymethylated regions (DMRs): paternally methylated DMRs contain less CpGs than maternally methylated DMRs. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 113, 130-137 (2006).
22. Tomizawa, S. -I. et al. Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development 138, 811-820 (2011).
23. Gu, H. et al. Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNAmethylation profiling. Nature Protocols 6, 468-481 (2011).
24. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocols 7, 562-578 (2012).
25. Huang, D. W. , Sherman, B. T. &Lempicki, R. A. Systematicandintegrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols 4, 44-57 (2009).
26. Boyle, P. et al. Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 13, R92 (2012).
27. Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571-1572 (2011).
28. Illingworth, R. S. et al. Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001134 (2010).
29. McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010).
30. Blake, J. A. et al. The mouse genome database genotypes:phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D712-D719 (2009).