Sound strategies for hearing restoration

Science

Volumn 344, Issue 6184, 2014, Pages

  Géléoc, Gwenaëlle S G ^a   Holt, Jeffrey R ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ENGINEERING; HEARING; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; NEUROLOGY; SENSORY SYSTEM;

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; GENE THERAPY; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEREDITY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR THERAPY; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPIRAL GANGLION; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL; CELL ENGINEERING; COCHLEA; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY; REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CELL ENGINEERING; COCHLEA; GENETIC THERAPY; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICE; REGENERATION; SPIRAL GANGLION; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 84900310185     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1241062     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. W. Zhan et al., Generational differences in the prevalence of hearing impairment in older adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171, 260-266 (2010). doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp370; pmid: 20008889
2. Y. Sergeyenko, K. Lall, M. C. Liberman, S. G. Kujawa, Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: An early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline. J. Neurosci. 33, 13686-13694 (2013). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1783-13. 2013; pmid: 23966690
3. J. P. Harris, A. F. Ryan, Fundamental immune mechanisms of the brain and inner ear. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 112, 639-653 (1995). doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70170-2; pmid: 7777346
4. T. Rivera, L. Sanz, G. Camarero, I. Varela-Nieto, Drug delivery to the inner ear: strategies and their therapeutic implications for sensorineural hearing loss. Curr. Drug Deliv. 9, 231 -242 (2012). doi: 10.2174/ 156720112800389098; pmid: 22283653
5. P. Wangemann, K+ cycling and the endocochlear potential. Hear. Res. 165, 1-9 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00279-4; pmid: 12031509
6. Y. H. Park et al., Conditioning the cochlea to facilitate survival and integration of exogenous cells into the auditory epithelium. Mol. Ther. 22, 873-880 (2014).
7. A. A. Eshraghi et al., The cochlear implant: Historical aspects and future prospects. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 295, 1967- 1980 (2012). doi: 10.1002/ar.22580; pmid: 23044644
8. "29 years old and hearing myself for the 1st time!" (2011); www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsOo3jzkhYA.
9. B. E. Pfingst et al., Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing. Hear. Res. 281, 65-73 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002; pmid: 21605648
10. M. Di Domenico et al., Towards gene therapy for deafness. J. Cell. Physiol. 226, 2494 -2499 (2011). doi: 10.1002/jcp.22617; pmid: 21792906
11. H. Fukui, Y. Raphael, Gene therapy for the inner ear. Hear. Res. 297, 99-105 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.017; pmid: 23265411
12. R. Sacheli, L. Delacroix, P. Vandenackerveken, L. Nguyen, B. Malgrange, Gene transfer in inner ear cells: A challenging race. Gene Ther. 20, 237-247 (2013). doi: 10.1038/gt.2012.51; pmid: 22739386
13. T. Hashimoto et al., Lentiviral gene replacement therapy of retinas in a mouse model for Usher syndrome type 1B. Gene Ther. 14, 584-594 (2007). doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302897; pmid: 17268537
14. G. Crispino et al., BAAV mediated GJB2 gene transfer restores gap junction coupling in cochlear organotypic cultures from deaf Cx26Sox10Cre mice. PLOS ONE 6, e23279 (2011). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023279; pmid: 21876744
15. Q. Yu et al., Virally expressed connexin26 restores gap junction function in the cochlea of conditional Gjb2 knockout mice. Gene Ther. 21, 71-80 (2013). pmid: 24225640
16. W. E. Nance, X. Z. Liu, A. Pandya, Relation between choice of partner and high frequency of connexin-26 deafness. Lancet 356, 500-501 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02565-4; pmid: 10981905
17. A. M. Sheffield et al., Viral vector tropism for supporting cells in the developing murine cochlea. Hear. Res. 277, 28-36 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.03.016; pmid: 21530627
18. L. Xia, S. Yin, J. Wang, Inner ear gene transfection in neonatal mice using adeno-associated viral vector: A comparison of two approaches. PLOS ONE 7, e43218 (2012). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043218; pmid: 22912830
19. L. A. Kilpatrick et al., Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery into the scala media of the normal and deafened adult mouse ear. Gene Ther. 18, 569-578 (2011). doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.175; pmid: 21209625
20. Y. Kawashima et al., Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel-like genes. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 4796-4809 (2011). doi: 10.1172/JCI60405; pmid: 22105175
21. J. R. Holt, B. Pan, M. A. Koussa, Y. Asai, TMC function in hair cell transduction. Hear. Res. (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.01.001; pmid: 24423408
22. K. Kurima et al., Dominant and recessive deafness caused by mutations of a novel gene, TMC1, required for cochlear hair-cell function. Nat. Genet. 30, 277-284 (2002). doi: 10.1038/ng842; pmid: 11850618
23. O. Akil et al., Restoration of hearing in the VGLUT3 knockout mouse using virally mediated gene therapy. Neuron 75, 283-293 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.019; pmid: 22841313
24. J. R. Holt, L. H. Vandenberghe, Gene therapy for deaf mice goes viral. Mol. Ther. 20, 1836-1837 (2012). doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.196; pmid: 23023054
25. D. M. Martin, Y. Raphael, Have you heard? Viral-mediated gene therapy restores hearing. Neuron 75, 188-190 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.008; pmid: 22841304
26. S. Yasunaga et al., A mutation in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, a FER-1-like protein, causes DFNB9, a nonsyndromic form of deafness. Nat. Genet. 21, 363-369 (1999). doi: 10.1038/7693; pmid: 10192385
27. I. Roux et al., Otoferlin, defective in a human deafness form, is essential for exocytosis at the auditory ribbon synapse. Cell 127, 277-289 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.040; pmid: 17055430
28. E. Reisinger et al., Probing the functional equivalence of otoferlin and synaptotagmin 1 in exocytosis. J. Neurosci. 31, 4886-4895 (2011). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5122-10.2011; pmid: 21451027
29. E. W. Rubel, S. A. Furrer, J. S. Stone, A brief history of hair cell regeneration research and speculations on the future. Hear. Res. 297, 42-51 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.12.014; pmid: 23321648
30. N. A. Bermingham et al., Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284, 1837-1841 (1999).doi: 10.1126/science.284. 5421.1837; pmid: 10364557
31. M. Izumikawa et al., Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nat. Med. 11, 271 -276 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nm1193; pmid: 15711559
32. S. P. Gubbels, D. W. Woessner, J. C. Mitchell, A. J. Ricci, J. V. Brigande, Functional auditory hair cells produced in the mammalian cochlea by in utero gene transfer. Nature 455, 537-541 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nature07265; pmid: 18754012
33. S. M. Yang et al ., Regeneration of stereocilia of hair cells by forced Atoh1 expression in the adult mammalian cochlea. PLOS ONE 7, e46355 (2012). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046355; pmid: 23029493
34. S. G. Kujawa, M. C. Liberman, Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 29, 14077-14085 (2009). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009; pmid: 19906956
35. P. Ernfors, T. Van De Water, J. Loring, R. Jaenisch, Complementary roles of BDNF and NT-3 in vestibular and auditory development. Neuron 14, 1153-1164 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90263-5; pmid: 7605630
36. U. Pirvola et al., Expression of neurotrophins and Trk receptors in the developing, adult, and regenerating avian cochlea. J. Neurobiol. 33, 1019 -1033 (1997). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199712)33:7〈1019::AIDNEU11〉3.0. CO;2-A; pmid: 9407020
37. M. Sugawara, J. C. Murtie, K. M. Stankovic, M. C. Liberman, G. Corfas, Dynamic patterns of neurotrophin 3 expression in the postnatal mouse inner ear. J. Comp. Neurol. 501, 30-37 (2007). doi: 10.1002/cne.21227; pmid: 17206617
38. Y. Zilberstein, M. C. Liberman, G. Corfas, Inner hair cells are not required for survival of spiral ganglion neurons in the adult cochlea. J. Neurosci. 32, 405-410 (2012). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4678-11.2012; pmid: 22238076
39. M. D. Geschwind et al., Defective HSV-1 vector expressing BDNF in auditory ganglia elicits neurite outgrowth: model for treatment of neuron loss following cochlear degeneration. Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 173-182 (1996). doi: 10.1089/hum.1996.7.2-173; pmid: 8788168
40. A. K. Wise et al., Effects of localized neurotrophin gene expression on spiral ganglion neuron resprouting in the deafened cochlea. Mol. Ther. 18, 1111-1122 (2010). doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.28; pmid: 20216530
41. P. J. Atkinson et al., Neurotrophin gene therapy for sustained neural preservation after deafness. PLOS ONE 7, e52338 (2012). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052338; pmid: 23284995
42. Jeremy L. Pinyon et al., Close-field electroporation gene delivery using the cochlear implant electrode array enhances the bionic ear. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 233ra54 (2014).
43. W. Chen et al., Human fetal auditory stem cells can be expanded in vitro and differentiate into functional auditory neurons and hair cell-like cells. Stem Cells 27, 1196-1204 (2009). doi: 10.1002/stem.62; pmid: 19418454
44. H. Li, G. Roblin, H. Liu, S. Heller, Generation of hair cells by stepwise differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 13495-13500 (2003). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2334503100; pmid: 14593207
45. K. Oshima et al., Mechanosensitive hair cell-like cells from embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 141, 704-716 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.035; pmid: 20478259
46. G. S. Géléoc, J. R. Risner, J. R. Holt, Developmental acquisition of voltage-dependent conductances and sensory signaling in hair cells of the embryonic mouse inner ear. J. Neurosci. 24, 11148-11159 (2004). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2662-04.2004; pmid: 15590931
47. K. R. Koehler, A. M. Mikosz, A. I. Molosh, D. Patel, E. Hashino, Generation of inner ear sensory epithelia from pluripotent stem cells in 3D culture. Nature 500, 217-221 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nature12298; pmid: 23842490
48. C. A. Makary, J. Shin, S. G. Kujawa, M. C. Liberman, S. N. Merchant, Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12, 711-717 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0283-2; pmid: 21748533
49. F. Shi, J. S. Kempfle, A. S. Edge, Wnt-responsive Lgr5-expressing stem cells are hair cell progenitors in the cochlea. J. Neurosci. 32, 9639-9648 (2012). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1064-12.2012; pmid: 22787049
50. D. Wei et al., Cells of adult brain germinal zone have properties akin to hair cells and can be used to replace inner ear sensory cells after damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 21000-21005 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0808044105; pmid: 19064919
51. F. Shi, C. E. Corrales, M. C. Liberman, A. S. Edge, BMP4 induction of sensory neurons from human embryonic stem cells and reinnervation of sensory epithelium. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 3016-3023 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568. 2007.05909.x; pmid: 18005071
52. W. Chen et al., Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors. Nature 490, 278-282 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11415; pmid: 22972191
53. T. Kondo et al., Tlx3 exerts context-dependent transcriptional regulation and promotes neuronal differentiation from embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 5780- 5785 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708704105; pmid: 18391221
54. J. H. Reyes et al., Glutamatergic neuronal differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells after transient expression of neurogenin 1 and treatment with BDNF and GDNF: in vitro and in vivo studies. J. Neurosci. 28, 12622-12631 (2008). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0563-08.2008; pmid: 19036956
55. C. E. Corrales et al ., Engraftment and differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells in the cochlear nerve trunk: Growth of processes into the organ of Corti. J. Neurobiol. 66, 1489-1500 (2006). doi: 10.1002/neu.20310; pmid: 17013931
56. F. Shi, A. S. Edge, Prospects for replacement of auditory neurons by stem cells. Hear. Res. 297, 106-112 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.017; pmid: 23370457
57. P. M. White, A. Doetzlhofer, Y. S. Lee, A. K. Groves, N. Segil, Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441, 984-987 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nature04849; pmid: 16791196
58. R. Chai et al., Wnt signaling induces proliferation of sensory precursors in the postnatal mouse cochlea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 8167- 8172 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202774109; pmid: 22562792
59. R. Chai et al., Dynamic expression of Lgr5, a Wnt target gene, in the developing and mature mouse cochlea. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12, 455-469 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0267-2; pmid: 21472479
60. F. Shi, L. Hu, A. S. Edge, Generation of hair cells in neonatal mice by b-catenin overexpression in Lgr5-positive cochlear progenitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 13851-13856 (2013). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219952110; pmid: 23918377
61. N. F. Bramhall, F. Shi, K. Arnold, K. Hochedlinger, A. S. Edge, Lgr5-positive supporting cells generate new hair cells in the postnatal cochlea. Stem Cell Rev. 2, 311-322 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.01.008; pmid: 24672754
62. B. C. Cox et al., Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo. Development 141, 816-829 (2014). doi: 10.1242/dev.103036; pmid: 24496619
63. S. J. Jeon, M. Fujioka, S. C. Kim, A. S. Edge, Notch signaling alters sensory or neuronal cell fate specification of inner ear stem cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 8351-8358 (2011). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6366-10.2011; pmid: 21653840
64. S. Korrapati, I. Roux, E. Glowatzki, A. Doetzlhofer, Notch signaling limits supporting cell plasticity in the hair cell-damaged early postnatal murine cochlea. PLOS ONE 8, e73276 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073276; pmid: 24023676
65. K. Mizutari et al., Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma. Neuron 77, 58- 69 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.032; pmid: 23312516
66. C. Sage et al., Proliferation of functional hair cells in vivo in the absence of the retinoblastoma protein. Science 307, 1114-1118 (2005).doi: 10.1126/science.1106642; pmid: 15653467
67. H. Laine et al., p19(Ink4d) and p21(Cip1) collaborate to maintain the postmitotic state of auditory hair cells, their codeletion leading to DNA damage and p53-mediated apoptosis. J. Neurosci. 27, 1434-1444 (2007). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4956-06.2007; pmid: 17287518
68. J. J. Lentz et al., Rescue of hearing and vestibular function by antisense oligonucleotides in a mouse model of human deafness. Nat. Med. 19, 345-350 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nm.3106; pmid: 23380860
69. E. Verpy et al., A defect in harmonin, a PDZ domain-containing protein expressed in the inner ear sensory hair cells, underlies Usher syndrome type 1C. Nat. Genet. 26, 51-55 (2000). doi: 10.1038/79171; pmid: 10973247
70. M. Bitner-Glindzicz et al., A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene. Nat. Genet. 26, 56-60 (2000). doi: 10.1038/79178; pmid: 10973248
71. N. Michalski et al., Harmonin-b, an actin-binding scaffold protein, is involved in the adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction by sensory hair cells. Pflugers Arch. 459, 115-130 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s00424-009-0711-x; pmid: 19756723
72. J. J. Lentz et al., Deafness and retinal degeneration in a novel USH1C knock-in mouse model. Dev. Neurobiol. 70, 253-267 (2010). doi: 10.1002/dneu.20771; pmid: 20095043
73. Y. Maeda, A. M. Sheffield, R. J. Smith, Therapeutic regulation of gene expression in the inner ear using RNA interference. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 66, 13-36 (2009). doi: 10.1159/000218205; pmid: 19494570
74. T. Gaj, C. A. Gersbach, C. F. Barbas 3rd, ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 397-405 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004; pmid: 23664777
75. T. Gaj, J. Guo, Y. Kato, S. J. Sirk, C. F. Barbas 3rd, Targeted gene knockout by direct delivery of zinc-finger nuclease proteins. Nat. Methods 9, 805-807 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2030; pmid: 22751204
76. P. Mali, K. M. Esvelt, G. M. Church, Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat. Methods 10, 957-963 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2649; pmid: 24076990
77. P. Mali et al., RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).doi: 10.1126/science.1232033; pmid: 23287722
78. N. Gunewardene, M. Dottori, B. A. Nayagam, The convergence of cochlear implantation with induced pluripotent stem cell therapy. Stem Cell Rev. 8, 741-754 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9320-0; pmid: 21956409
79. V. H. Hernandez et al ., Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1114-1129 (2014). doi: 10.1172/JCI69050; pmid: 24509078
80. B. W. Kesser, G. T. Hashisaki, K. Fletcher, H. Eppard, J. R. Holt, An in vitro model system to study gene therapy in the human inner ear. Gene Ther. 14, 1121-1131 (2007). doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302980; pmid: 17568767
81. Y. Nelson, S. Kang, in Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Sensory Processes (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1984), vol. 3, pp. 639-674.
82. I. M. Hunter-Duvar, A technique for preparation of cochlear specimens for assessment with the scanning electron microscope. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 351, 3-23 (1978). doi: 10.3109/00016487809122718; pmid: 352089
83. G. M. Clark, The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 361, 791-810 (2006). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1782; pmid: 16627295