The construct of state-level suspicion: A model and research agenda for automated and information technology (IT) contexts

Human Factors

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 489-508

  Bobko, Philip ^a   Barelka, Alex J ^b   Hirshfield, Leanne M ^c  

^a GETTYSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

distrust; information technology; state suspicion

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

COGNITIVE PROCESSING; DETECTION OF DECEPTIONS; DISTRUST; FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT; GENERIC MODELING; PRECISE DEFINITION; RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS; STATE SUSPICION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUTOMATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; RESEARCH; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRUST;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUTOMATION; HUMANS; INFORMATICS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH; TRUST;

EID: 84898981886     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720813497052     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Bailey N., Scerbo M.. Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: The role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2007 ; 8: 321-348
2. Benbasat I., Gefen D., Pavlou P.. Special issue introduction: Trust in online environments. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2008 ; 24: 5-11
3. Bisantz A., Seong Y.. Assessment of operator trust in utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomic. 2001 ; 28: 85-97 (Pubitemid 32586794)
4. Bobko P. Correlation and regression. 2001 ). Correlation and regression (Rev. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ; 2001:
5. Bobko P. A review and analysis of suspicion (and IT suspicion) as a psychological construct: Interim report. Dayton, OH: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base ; 2012:
6. Bond G.. Focus on basic cognitive mechanisms and strategies in deception research (and remand custody of "wizards" to Harry Potter movies). Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2012 ; 1: 128-130
7. Bond G., Lee A.. The darkest side of trust: Validating the generalized communication suspicion scale with prison inmates. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005 ; 38: 1429-1438 (Pubitemid 40280456)
8. Borman W., White L., Pulakos E., Oppler S.. Models of supervisor job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991 ; 76: 863-872
9. Buhler P., Huhns M.. Trust and persistence. IEEE Internet Computing. 2001 ; 5: 85-87 (Pubitemid 32380533)
10. Buller D., Burgoon J.. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory. 1996 ; 3: 203-242
11. Burgoon J., Blair J., Strom R. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2005: 1-8.
12. Buss A., Durkee A.. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1957 ; 21: 343-349
13. Buss A., Perry M.. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992 ; 63: 452-459
14. Cacioppo J., Petty R.. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982 ; 42: 116-131
15. Campbell M., Kirmani A.. Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research. 2000 ; 27: 69-83
16. Chen J., Barnes M., Harper-Sciarini M.. Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human-performance issues and user-interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C, Applications and Reviews. 2010 ; 41: 435-454
17. Colquitt J., LePine J., Piccolo R., Zapata C., Rich B.. Explaining the justice-performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012 ; 97: 1-15
18. Cornum R., Matthews M., Seligman M.. Comprehensive soldier fitness: Building resilience in a challenging institutional context. American Psychologist. 2011 ; 66: 4-9
19. Cramer H., Evers V., Kemper N., Wielinga B.. Effects of autonomy, traffic conditions and driver personality traits on attitudes and trust towards in-vehicle agents. IEEE International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology ; 2008 New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2008. 477.
20. DeCarlo T.. The effects of sales message and suspicion of ulterior motives on salesperson evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2005 ; 15: 238-249
21. Deutsch M.. Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1958 ; 2: 265-279
22. Dimoka A.. What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly. 2010 ; 34: 1-24
23. Ebenbach D., Moore C.. Incomplete information, inferences, and individual differences: The case of environmental judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000 ; 81: 1-27
24. Echebarria-Echabe A.. Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments. Journal of Social Psychology. 2010 ; 150: 148-159
25. Fein S.. Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996 ; 70: 1164-1184
26. Ferrin D., Dirks K.. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science. 2003 ; 14: 18-31 (Pubitemid 36263850)
27. Friedman M., Ulmer D. Treating type-A behavior and your heart. New York, NY: Knopf ; 1984:
28. Gallagher H., Frith C.. Functional imaging of "theory of mind.". Trends in Cognitive Science. 2003 ; 7: 77-83
29. Gefen D., Benbasat I., Pavlou P.. A research agenda for trust in online experiments. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2008 ; 24: 275-286 (Pubitemid 351721666)
30. Gilbert D., Hixon G.. The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991 ; 60: 509-517
31. Grant A., Hofmann D.. Outsourcing inspiration: The performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2011 ; 116: 173-187
32. Griffin R., Moorhead G. Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. 2010 ). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin ; 2010:
33. Hajcak G., McDonald N., Simons R.. Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain and Cognition. 2004 ; 56: 189-197 (Pubitemid 39423881)
34. Hancock P., Billings D., Schaefer K., Chen J., de Visser E., Parasuraman R.. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors. 2011 ; 53: 517-527
35. Hilton J., Fein S., Miller D.. Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1993 ; 19: 501-512
36. Hoffman A.. The structural causes of trusting relationships: Why rivals do not overcome suspicion step by step. Political Science Quarterly. 2007 ; 122: 287-312
37. Hofstede G., Bond M.. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics. 1988 ; 16: 5-21
38. Huddy L., Feldman S.. Americans respond politically to 9/11: Understanding the impact of the terrorist acts and their aftermath. American Psychologist. 2011 ; 66: 455-467
39. Huhns M., Buell D.. Trusted autonomy. IEEE Internet Computing. 2002 ; 6: 92-95 (Pubitemid 34669569)
40. Jagacinski C.. Personnel decision making: The impact of missing information. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991 ; 76: 19-30
41. Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D.. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science. 1999 ; 10: 791-815
42. Johnson R., Levin I.. More than meets the eye: The effect of missing information on purchase evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research. 1985 ; 12: 169-177
43. Kim R., Levine T.. The effect of suspicion on deception detection accuracy: Optimal level or opposing effects?. Communication Reports. 2011 ; 24: 51-62
44. Krueger F., McCabe K., Moll J., Kriegeskorte N., Zahn R., Strenziok M., Heinecke A., Grafman J.. Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007 ; 104: 20084-20089
45. Lee J., See K.. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 50-80 (Pubitemid 44490367)
46. LeFevre M., Matheny J., Kolt G.. Eustress, distress, and interpretation in occupational stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2003 ; 18: 726-744 (Pubitemid 38041710)
47. Levine T., McCornack S.. The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly. 1991 ; 39: 325-340
48. Lewicki R., McAllister D., Bies R.. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review. 1998 ; 23: 438-458
49. Li X., Hess T., Valacich J.. Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2008 ; 17: 39-71
50. Lissitz R., Willhoft J.. A methodological study of the Torrance tests of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement. 1985 ; 22: 1-11
51. Lowry P., Vance A., Moody G., Beckman B., Read A.. Explaining and predicting the impact of branding alliances and web site quality on initial consumer trust of e-commerce web sites. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2008 ; 24: 199-224 (Pubitemid 351721663)
52. Lyons J., Stokes C., Eschleman K., Alarcon G., Barelka A.. Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: An evaluation of the nomological network. Human Factors. 2011 ; 53: 219-229
53. MacCrae C., Milne A., Bodenhausen G.. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994 ; 66: 37-47
54. Mahoney R. The Kennedy brothers: The rise and fall of Jack and Bobby. New York, NY: Arcade ; 2011:
55. Marsland A., Cohen S., Rabin B., Manuck S.. Trait positive affect and antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2006 ; 20: 261-269
56. Mayer R., Davis J., Schoorman D.. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995 ; 20: 709-734
57. McAllister D.. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 1995 ; 38: 24-59
58. McCornack S., Levine T.. When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs. 1990 ; 57: 219-230
59. McKnight D., Choudhury V., Kacmar C.. The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002 ; 11: 297-323
60. McKnight D., Kacmar C., Choudhury V.. Dispositional trust and distrust distinctions in predicting high- and low-risk internet expert advice site perceptions. e-Service Journal. 2004 ; 3: 35-55
61. Merritt S., Ilgen D.. Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors. 2008 ; 50: 194-210 (Pubitemid 351744366)
62. Metzger M., Flanagin A., Medders R.. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication. 2010 ; 60: 413-439
63. Mlodinow L. Subliminal: How your unconscious mind rules your behavior. New York, NY: Vintage ; 2012:
64. Myers D. Psychology. 2010 ). Psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: Worth. New York, NY: Worth ; 2010:
65. Nass C., Josson I., Harris H., Reaves B., Endo J., Brave S., Takayama L.. Improving automotive safety by paring driver emotion and car voice emotion. Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, CHI ; 2005 New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery ; 2005. 1973.
66. Oliveira F., McDonald J., Goodman D.. Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error-related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007 ; 19: 1994-2004 (Pubitemid 350220511)
67. OlsonN. (2009). The development of IT suspicion as a construct and subsequent measure (Unpublished master's thesis). Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
68. Parasuraman R., Manzey D.. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors. 2010 ; 52: 381-410
69. Parasuraman R., Miller C.. Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACH. 2004 ; 4: 51-55
70. Parasuraman R., Riley V.. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors. 1997 ; 39: 230-253
71. PattersonT. (2009). The effect of cognitive load on deception (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida International University, Miami.
72. Potosky D.. The Internet knowledge (iKnow) measure. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007 ; 23: 2760-2777 (Pubitemid 46880138)
73. Potosky D., Bobko P.. The computer understanding and experience scale: A self report measure of computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior. 1998 ; 14: 337-348 (Pubitemid 128426335)
74. Premack D., Woodruff G.. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral Brain Science. 1978 ; 1: 515-526 (Pubitemid 10077282)
75. Priester J., Petty R.. Source attribution and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995 ; 21: 637-654
76. Ray J., Baker L., Plowman D.. Organizational mindfulness in business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2011 ; 10: 188-203
77. Reynolds G. A primer of operant conditioning. New York, NY: Scott, Foresman ; 1968:
78. Ridings C., Gefen D., Arinze B.. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2002 ; 11: 271-295
79. Sherman J., Frost L.. On the encoding of stereotype-relevant information under cognitive load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000 ; 26: 26-34
80. Sinaceur M.. Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010 ; 46: 543-550
81. Stickney L.. Affect and decision making. Decision Line. 2009 ;: 4-6
82. Tversky A., Kahneman D.. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 ; 211: 453-458 (Pubitemid 11145313)
83. van Hooft E., Born M.. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: Using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012 ; 97: 301-316
84. Vonk R.. The slime effect: Suspicion and dislike of likable behavior towards superiors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998 ; 74: 849-864
85. Waldman D., Balthazard P., Peterson S.. Leadership and neuroscience: Can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed?. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2011 ; 25: 60-74
86. Wang W., Benbasat I.. Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: A study of recommendation agents for e-commerce. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2008 ; 24: 249-273 (Pubitemid 351721665)
87. Watabe M., Ban H., Yamamoto H.. Judgments about others' trustworthiness: An fMRI study. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science. 2011 ; 2: 28-32
88. Xu G., Feng Z., Wu H., Zhao D.. Swift trust in a virtual temporary system: A model based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief and functions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2007 ; 12: 93-126
89. Yoon Y., Gurhan-Canli Z., Schwarz N.. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2006 ; 16: 377-390
90. Zhou L., Zhang D.. Typing or messaging? Modality effect on deception detection in computer-mediated communication. Decision Support Systems. 2007 ; 44: 188-201 (Pubitemid 47374307)
91. Ziegler M.. Applicant faking: A look into the black box. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist. 2011 ; 49: 29-36