Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: The role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 321-348

  Bailey, N R ^a   Scerbo, M W ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Complacency; Monitoring; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007837535     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220500535301     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BARBER, B., 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
2. BILLINGS, C.E., LAUBER, J.K., FUNKHOUSER, H., LYMAN, G. and HUFF, E.M., 1976, NASA aviation safety reporting system, Technical Report No. TM-X-3445 (Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center).
3. FARRELL, S. and LEWANDOWSKY, S., 2000, A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, pp. 395-410.
4. GRUBB, P.L., WARM, J.S., DEMBER, W.N. and BERCH, D.B., 1995, Effects of multiple-signal discrimination on vigilance performance and perceived workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, San Diego: CA, pp. 1360-1364.
5. HURST, K. and HURST, L., 1982, Pilot Error: The Human Factors (New York, NY: Aronson).
6. LANGER, E.J., 1989, Mindfulness (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
7. LEE, J. and MORAY, N., 1992, Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, pp. 1243-1270.
8. LEE, J.D. and SEE, K.A., 2004, Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, pp. 50-80.
9. MOLLOY, R. and PARASURAMAN, R., 1996, Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, pp. 311-322.
10. MUIR, B.M., 1987, Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 27, pp. 527-539.
11. MUIR, B.M., 1989, Operators’ trust in and use of automatic controllers in a supervisory process control task. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
12. MUIR, B.M., 1994, Trust in automation: I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, pp. 1905-1922.
13. MUIR, B.M. and MORAY, N., 1996, Trust in automation: II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39, pp. 429-460.
14. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD (NTSB), 1973, Eastern Airlines L-1011, Miami, Florida, December 29, 1972, Technical Report NTSB-AAR-73-14 (Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board).
15. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD (NTSB), 1988, Northwest Airlines, Inc., McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Romulus Michigan, August 16, 1987, Technical Report NTSB-AAR-88-05 (Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board).
16. PARASURAMAN, R., BAHRI, T., DEATON, J.E., MORRISON, J.G. and BARNES, M., 1992, Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems, Progress Report No. NAWCADWAR-92066-60 (Warminster, PA: Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division).
17. PARASURAMAN, R., MOLLOY, R. and SINGH, I.L., 1993, Performance consequences of automation- induced “complacency”. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, pp. 1-23.
18. PARASURAMAN, R. and RILEY, V., 1997, Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, pp. 230-253.
19. REASON, J.R., 1990, Human Error (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
20. REMPEL, J.K., HOLMES, J.G. and ZANNA, M.P., 1985, Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49, pp. 95-112.
21. ROTTER, J.B., 1980, Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, pp. 1-7.
22. ROUSE, W.B., 1976, Adaptive allocation of decision making responsibility between supervisor and computer. In Monitoring Behaviour and Supervisory Control, T.B. Sheridan and G. Johannsen (Eds), pp. 295-306 (New York: Plenum).
23. SARTER, N.B. and WOODS, D., 1995, How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, pp. 5-19.
24. SCERBO, M.W., 1996, Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In Automation, & Human Performance: Theory and Applications, R. Parasuraman and M. Mouloua (Eds), pp. 37-63 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
25. SINGH, I.L., MOLLOY, R. and PARASURAMAN, R., 1993, Automation-induced “complacency”: development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, pp. 111-122.
26. THACKRAY, R.I. and TOUCHSTONE, R.M., 1989, Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, pp. 744-748.
27. WIENER, E.L., 1981, Complacency: is the term useful for air safety? In Proceedings of the 26th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar, pp. 116-25 (CO: Denver).
28. WIENER, E.L., 1988, Cockpit automation. In Human Factors in Aviation, E.L. Wiener and D.C. Nagel (Eds), pp. 433-461 (San Diego, CA: Academic Press).
29. WIENER, E.L. and CURRY, R.E., 1980, Flight-deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, pp. 995-1011.
30. YOUNG, M.S. and STANTON, N.A., 2002, Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors, 44, pp. 365-375.