Effects of suspicion on willingness to engage in systematic processing of persuasive arguments

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 148-159

  Echebarria Echabe, Agustin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Attitude change or persuasion; Cognitive style; Persuasion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPAIN; TRUST;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SPAIN; TRUST;

EID: 77649169252     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540903366412     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford: Academic Press.
2. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
3. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individual varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
4. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasive context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristics-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
6. DeCarlo, T. E. (2005). The effects of sales messages and suspicion of ulterior motives on salesperson evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 238-249.
7. Echebarria, A. & Fernandez, E. (2004). The influence of incidental and integral affects on outgroup perception. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 17, 51-69.
8. Fein, S. & Hilton, J.L. (1994). Judging others in the shadow of suspicion. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 167-198.
9. Fitzsimons, G. J. & Lehman, D. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23, 82-94.
10. Larson, D. W. (2004). Distrust: Prudent, if not always wise. In R. Hardin (Ed.), Distrust (pp. 34-59). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Bubuque, IA: Brown.
12. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 37-72). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Petty, R. E., Tormale, Z. L., Hawkins, C., & Wegener, D. (2001). Motivation to think and order effects in persuasion: The moderating role of chunking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 332-344.
15. Rosenblatt, P. C. (1966). Persuasion as a function of varying amounts of distraction. Psychonomic Science, 5, 85-86.
16. Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004). Encoding under trust and distrust: The spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 668-679.
17. Wilder, D. A. & Simon, A. F. (1996). Incidental and integral affect as triggers of stereotyping. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 397-419). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Worchel, S. & Brehm, J. W. (1971). Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 294-304.
19. Wyer, R. S. & Shavitt, S. (2005). Editorial note. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 192.