Precollege engineering education

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 747-758

  Cunningham, Christine M ^a   Carlsen, William S ^b  

^a Museum of Science   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898549405     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203097267     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 23-38.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Anning, A. (1997). Drawing out ideas: Graphicacy and young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7 (3), 219-239.
4. Apedoe, X., Ellefson, M., & Schunn, C. (2012). Learning together while designing: Does group size make a difference? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 (1), 83-94.
5. Apedoe, X., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M., & Schunn, C. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17 (5), 454-465.
6. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 3-27.
7. Bamberger, Y., Cahill, C., Hagerty, J., Short, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Learning science by doing design: How can it work at the middle school level? Journal of Education, Informatics and Cybernetics, 2 (2), 41-46.
8. Barlex, D. (Ed.). (2007). Design and technology-for the next generation. Whitchurch, UK: Cliffeco Communications.
9. Barnett, M. (2005). Engaging inner city students in learning through designing remote operated vehicles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14 (1), 87-100.
10. Barron, B., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3 & 4), 271-311.
11. Benson, C., & Lunt, J. (Eds.). (2011). International handbook of primary technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (Vol. 7). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
12. Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26 (3), 369-398.
14. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3), 369-387.
15. Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (9), 971-1002.
16. Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (7), 715-729.
17. Capobianco, B. M. (2010). Exploring a science teacher's uncertainty with integrating engineering design: An action research study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22 (7), 645-660.
18. Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100 (2), 304-328.
19. Carlsen, W. S. (1998). Engineering design in the classroom: Is it good science education or is it revolting? Research in Science Education, 28 (1), 51-63.
20. Cunningham, C. M. (2009). Engineering is Elementary. The Bridge, 30, 11-17.
21. Cunningham, C. M., Knight, M. T., Carlsen, W. S., & Kelly, G. (2007). Integrating engineering in middle and high school classrooms. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23 (1), 3.
22. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
23. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20 (4), 399-483.
24. Falkenheim, J. C., & Burrelli, J. S. (2012, March). Diversity in science and engineering employment in industry (NSF 12-311). Arlington, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.
25. Fantz, T. D., & Katsioloudis, P. J. (2011). Analysis of engineering content within technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 23 (1), 19-31.
26. Fleer, M. (2000a). Interactive technology: Can children construct their own technological design briefs? Research in Science Education, 30 (2), 241-253.
27. Fleer, M. (2000b). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 10 (1), 43-59.
28. Fleer, M., & Sukroo, J. (1995). I can make my robot dance: Technology for 3-8 year olds. Carlton, VIC: Curriculum Corporation.
29. Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1081-1110.
30. Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. S., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problemsolving. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (7), 855-879.
31. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (3), 247-298.
32. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17 (4), 379-432.
33. Jones, A., & De Vries, M. (2009). International handbook of research and development in technology education (Vol. 5). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
34. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84 (2), 180-192.
35. Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students' science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10 (3), 323-363.
36. Kanter, D. E. (2010). Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding. Science Education, 94 (3), 525-551.
37. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
38. Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99-117; 288-291). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
39. Kelly, G. J. (2011). Scientific literacy, discourse, and epistemic practices. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 61-73). New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39 (3).
41. Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225-242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (4), 495-547.
43. Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317-334). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44. Krajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92 (1), 1-32.
45. Kuhn, D., & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 1-44). New York, NY: Academic.
46. Lachapelle, C. P., & Cunningham, C. M. (2014). Engineering in elementary schools. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
47. Lachapelle, C. P., Cunningham, C. M., Jocz, J., Kay, A. E., Phadnis, P., Wertheimer, J., & Arteaga, R. (2011). Engineering is Elementary: An evaluation of years 4 through 6 field testing. Boston: Museum of Science.
48. Lawson, A. E. (1985). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
49. Levy, S. T. (2013). Young children's learning of water physics by constructing working systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23 (3), 537-566.
50. McKay, M., & McGrath, B. (2007). Real-world problem-solving using real-time data. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23 (1), 36-42.
51. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (1), 1-15.
52. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
53. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students' views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (4), 363-381.
54. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
55. Obama, B. H. (2009, November 23). Remarks on the "Educate to Innovate" Campaign. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www. gpo. gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-200900940/contentdetail. html.
56. O'Neill, T. B. (2010). Fostering spaces of student ownership in middle school science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43 (1), 6-20.
57. O'Neill, T. B., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2005). Uncovering student ownership in science learning: The making of a student created mini-documentary. School Science and Mathematics, 105 (6), 292-301.
58. Park, R. L. (2003). The seven warning signs of bogus science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, B20.
59. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author.
60. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (2), 125-143.
61. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3/4), 429-449.
62. Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of the technology education curriculum of six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15 (1), 31-47.
63. Roth, W.-M. (1995a). From "wiggly structures" to "unshaky towers": Problem framing, solution finding, and negotiation of courses of actions during a civil engineering unit for elementary students. Research in Science Education, 25 (4), 365-381.
64. Roth, W.-M. (1995b). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79 (5), 475-502.
65. Roth, W.-M. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5 (2), 129-166.
66. Roth, W.-M. (1997). Interactional structures during a Grade 4-5 opendesign engineering unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (3), 273-302.
67. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77 (2), 186-232.
68. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. (2001). Re/constructing elementary science. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
69. Rutland, M., & Barlex, D. (2008). Perspectives on pupil creativity in design and technology in the lower secondary education curriculum in England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 139-165.
70. Schaffer, S. (1989). Glass works: Newton's prisms and the uses of experiment. In T. Pinch & S. Schaffer (Eds.), The uses of experiment: Studies in the natural sciences (pp. 67-104). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transition from engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (9), 859-882.
72. Silk, E. M., Schunn, C. D., & Cary, M. S. (2009). The impact of an engineering design curriculum on science reasoning in an urban setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18 (3), 209-223.
73. Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63 (2), 21-32.