The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 715-729

  Cajas, Fernando ^a  

^a AAAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035446480     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1028     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Proceedings of the AAAS Technology Education Research Conference. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: www.project2061.org/technology.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Barak, M., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (1999). Who will teach an integrated program for science and technology in Israeli junior high school? A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 239-253.
6. Barlex, D. (1998). Design and technology education: The Nuffield perspective in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), 139-150.
7. Black, P. (1999). An international overview of curricular approaches and models in technology education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 24(1), 24-30. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTS/
8. Bouhdili, C. (1996). Teaching technology in America: The latest 50 years. Unpublished manuscript prepared for AAAS/Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.
9. Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Cajas, F. (1998). Introducing technology in science education: The case of Guatemala. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 18(3), 198-207.
11. DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teacher College Press.
12. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.). (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
13. Fensham, P.J. (1998). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
14. Gallagher, J. (1971). A broader base for science teaching. Science Education, 55, 329-338.
15. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Goldman, S. (1984). The techné of philosophy and the philosophy of technology. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Research in Philosophy of Technology: Vol. 7. Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press, 130-134.
17. Gustafson, R., & Guilbert (1999). Elementary children's strategies for testing structural strength: A three year study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
18. Hepburn, G., & Gaskell, J. (1998). Teaching a new science and technology course: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 777-789.
19. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
20. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science. London: Routledge.
21. Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C., Berkheimer, G., & Blakeslee, T. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
22. McRobbie, C.J., Stein, S.J., & Ginns, I. (2000a). Elementary school students approaches to design activities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
23. McRobbie, C.J., Stein, S.J., & Ginns, I. (2000b). Preservice elementary teachers' thinking about technology and technology Education. International Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 81-101.
24. Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the "at rest" condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10-14.
25. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1974). The child's construction of quantities. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
27. Roth, W.M. (1996a). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129-166.
28. Roth, W.M. (1996b). Learning to talk engineering design: Results from an interpretative study in grade 4/5 classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 6(2), 107-135.
29. Roth, W.M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
30. Rowell, P.M., & Gustafson, B.J. (Eds.). (1998). Problem solving trough technology case studies in Alberta elementary classrooms. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Center for Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.
31. Rowell, P.M., Gustafson, B.J., & Guilbert, S.M. (1999). Characterization of technology within an elementary science program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 37-55.
32. Russell, T., Longden, K., & McGuigan, L. (1991). Materials: Primary Space Processes and Concepts Exploration (SPACE) research project. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
33. Sadler, P.M., Coyle, H.P., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classrooms: Key elements in developing affective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning of Sciences, 9(3), 299-324.
34. Salvatori, M. (1979). Building: The fight against gravity. New York: Atheneum.
35. Salvatori, M. (1980). Why buildings stand up. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Student's transitions from engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882.
37. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Spiegel-Rösing, I., & Solla, D. (Eds.). (1977). Science technology and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Vicenti, W. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledge in context. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(1), 111-121.
41. Yager, R. (1996). History of science/technology/society as reform in the United States. In R. Yager (Ed.), Science/technology/society as reform in science education (pp. 3-15). New York: Sunny.
42. Zuga, K.F. (1999). An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203-217.