Uncovering Student Ownership in Science Learning: The Making of a Student Created Mini-Documentary

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 292-301

  O'Neill, Tara ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85167404425     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18130.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York: Freedman.
2. Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38.(8), 899–917.
3. Barton, A. C. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4. Brown, J., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research, 18.(1), 32–42.
5. Davis, K. (2001). Advocating for equitable science-learning opportunities for girls in an urban city youth club and the roadblocks faced by women science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39.(2), 151–163.
6. DeGolier, T. (2002). Using a guided-inquiry approach for investigating metabolic rate in mice. The American Biology Teacher, 64.(6), 449–54.
7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillian Publishing Co.
8. Ediger, M. (2001). The student, journal Writing, and the social Studies. College Student Journal, 35.(4), 560–64.
9. Fusco, D. & Calabrese Barton, A. (2001). Representing student achievements in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38.(3), 337–54.
10. Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38.(8), 860–77.
11. Killeen, J.; Evans G.; & Danko S. (2003). The role of permanent student artwork in students' sense of ownership in an elementary school. Environment and Behavior, 35.(2), 250–263.
12. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. New York City Department of Education. (2004). School information [online]. Available: http://www.nycenet.edu.
14. Prain, V. & Hand, D. (1998). Students' perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83, 151–162.
15. Rahm, J. (2001). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39.(2), 164–184.
16. Rennie, L.J., & McClafferty, T.P. (1996). Science centers and science learning. Studies in Science Education, 26, 53–98.
17. Rennie, L.J., Feher, Dierking, & Falk. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40.(2), 112–20.
18. Schauble, L., Bartel, K. (1997). Constructing a science gallery for children and families. Science Education, 81.(6), 781–791.
19. Trueba, H. (1999). Critical ethnography and a Vygostkian pedagogy of hope: The empowerment of Mexican immigrant children. Qualitative Studies in Education, 12.(6), 591–614.
20. US Department of Commerce (1999), Bureau of the Census Annual Census Report. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce.
21. Wright, J.C. (1998). A commentary on the profound changes envisioned by the national science standards. Teachers College Record, 100.(1), 122–43.