An embodied model of young children's categorization and word learning

Theoretical and Computational Models of Word Learning: Trends in Psychology and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 172-196

  Twomey, Katherine E ^a   Horst, Jessica S ^b   Morse, Anthony F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; ROBOTICS;

ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING; COGNITIVE PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY; EMBODIED MODELS; EMBODIED SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; YOUNG CHILDREN;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84897940843     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2973-8.ch008     Document Type: Chapter

References (141)

1. Akhtar, N., Jipson, J., & Callanan, M. A. (2001). Learning words through overhearing. Child Development, 72(2), 416-430. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00287
2. Alvy Ray, S. (1978). Color gamut transform pairs. SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 12(3), 12-19. doi:10.1145/965139.807361
3. Aslin, R., & Mehler, J. (2005). Near-infrared spectroscopy for functional studies of brain activity in human infants: Promise, prospects, and challenges. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 10(1). doi:10.1117/1.1854672
4. Aslin, R., & Salapatek, P. (1975). Saccadic localization of visual targets by the very young human infant. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 17(3), 293-302.
5. Au, T. K. F., & Glusman, M. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning - To honor or not to honor. Child Development, 61(5), 1474-1490. doi:10.2307/1130757
6. Axelsson, E. L., Churchley, K., & Horst, J. S. (2012). The right thing at the right time: Why ostensive naming facilitates word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
7. Baillargeon, R. E., & Wang, S. H. (2002). Event categorization in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 85-93. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01836-2
8. Berthouze, L., & Metta, G. (2005). Epigenetic robotics: Modelling cognitive development in robotic systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 189-192. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2004.11.002
9. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000139
10. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23(1), 1-31. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2301_1
11. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. The British Journal of Psychology, 81(3), 361-380. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02367.x
12. Burton, A. M., Young, A. W., Bruce, V., Johnston, R. A., & Ellis, A. W. (1991). Understanding covert recognition. Cognition, 39(2), 129-166. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90041-2
13. Cangelosi, A., Belpaeme, T., Sandini, G., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Sagerer, G., et al. (2008). The ITALK project: Integration and transfer of action and language knowledge. Paper presented at the Third ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
14. Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17-29.
15. Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In Hirschfield, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Spicificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752902.008
16. Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M. (2002). Two-yearolds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 967-978. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.967
17. Cohen, L. B., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development, 50(2), 419-424. doi:10.2307/1129417
18. Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2003). The emergence of abstract ideas: Evidence from networks and babies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1205-1214. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1306
19. Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2008). Knowledge embedded in process: The self-organization of skilled noun learning. Developmental Science, 11(2), 195-203. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00665.x
20. Cowan, N. (2003). Comparisons of developmental modeling frameworks and levels of analysis in cognition: Connectionist and dynamic systems theories deserve attention, but don't yet explain attention. Developmental Science, 6(4), 440-447. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00299
21. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S., & Hertz-Pannier, L. (2002). Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science, 298(5600), 2013-2015. doi:10.1126/science.1077066
22. Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2003). How specific is the shape bias? Child Development, 74(1), 168-178. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00528
23. Diesendruck, G., & Graham, S. A. (2010). Kind matters: A reply to Samuelson & Perone. Cognitive Development, 25, 149-153. doi:10.1016/j. cogdev.2010.02.003
24. Eimas, P. D., Quinn, P. C., & Cowan, P. (1994). Development of exclusivity in perceptually based categories of young infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58(3), 418-431. doi:10.1006/jecp.1994.1043
25. Fantz, R. L., & Fagan, J. F. (1975). Visual attention to size and number of pattern details by term and preterm infants during first 6 months. Child Development, 46(1), 3-18. doi:10.2307/1128828
26. Faubel, C., & Schöner, G. (2008). Learning to recognize objects on the fly: A neurally based dynamic field approach. Neural Networks, 21(4), 562-576. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.03.007
27. Fava, E., Hull, R., & Bortfeld, H. (2011). Linking behavioral and neurophysiological indicators of perceptual tuning to language. Frontiers in Psychology, 2.
28. Feldman, J., & Bailey, D. (2000). Layered hybrid connectionist models for cognitive science. Hybrid Neural Systems, 1778, 14-27. doi:10.1007/10719871_2
29. Field, T. M., Cohen, D., Garcia, R., & Greenberg, R. (1984). Mother-stranger face discrimination by the newborn. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 19-25. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80019-3
30. Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G. V., Clifford, A., Kay, P., Regier, T., & Davies, I. R. L. (2008). Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(47), 18221-18225. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0809952105
31. French, R. M., Mareschal, D., Mermillod, M., & Quinn, P. C. (2004). The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3-to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133(3), 382-397. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.382
32. Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Smith, L. B. (2004). Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child Development, 75(4), 1098-1114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00728.x
33. Gliga, T., Mareschal, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2008). Ten-month-olds' selective use of visual dimensions in category learning. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(2), 287-293. doi:10.1016/j. infbeh.2007.12.001
34. Gogate, L. J., & Hollich, G. (2010). Invariance detection within an interactive system: A perceptual gateway to language development. Psychological Review, 117(2), 496. doi:10.1037/a0019049
35. Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bailey, L. M., & Wenger, N. R. (1992). Young children and adults use lexical principles to learn new nouns. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 99-108. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.99
36. Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14(1), 23-45. doi:10.1017/S030500090001271X
37. Gredebäck, G., Johnson, S. P., & von Hofsten, C. (2009). Eye tracking in infancy research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 1-19. doi:10.1080/87565640903325758
38. Grieser, D. A., & Kuhl, P. K. (1989). Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes. Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 577. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.4.577
39. Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a wordlearning strategy. Cognition, 87(1), B23-B34. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00186-5
40. Halberda, J. (2006). Is this a dax which I see before me? Use of the logical argument disjunctive syllogism supports word-learning in children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 53(4), 310-344. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.003
41. Heibeck, T. H., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Word learning in children - An examination of fast mapping. Child Development, 58(4), 1021-1034. doi:10.2307/1130543
42. Hollich, G., & Prince, C. G. (2009). Comparing infants' preference for correlated audiovisual speech with signal-level computational models. Developmental Science, 12(3), 379-387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00823.x
43. Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., & Chung, H. L. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3).
44. Horst, J. S., Ellis, A. E., Samuelson, L. K., Trejo, E., Worzalla, S. L., & Peltan, J. R. (2009). Toddlers can adaptively change how they categorize: Same objects, same session, two different categorical distinctions. Developmental Science, 12(1), 96-105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00737.x
45. Horst, J. S., Oakes, L. M., & Madole, K. L. (2005). What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize. Child Development, 76(3), 614-631. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00867.x
46. Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-monthold infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128-157. doi:10.1080/15250000701795598
47. Horst, J. S., Samuelson, L. K., Kucker, S. C., & McMurray, B. (2011). What's new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection. Cognition, 118(2), 234-244. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.015
48. Horst, J. S., Scott, E. J., & Pollard, J. A. (2011). The role of competition in word learning via referent selection. Developmental Science, 13(5), 706-713. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00926.x
49. Houston-Price, C., Caloghiris, Z., & Raviglione, E. (2010). Language experience shapes the development of the mutual exclusivity bias. Infancy, 15(2), 125-150. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00009.x
50. Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., & Kuniyoshi, Y. (Eds.). (2004). Embodied artificial intelligence. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/b99075
51. James, D. K. (2010). Fetal learning: A critical review. Infant and Child Development, 19(1), 45-54. doi:10.1002/icd.653
52. Jaswal, V. K., & Markman, E. M. (2001). Learning proper and common names in inferential versus ostensive contexts. Child Development, 72(3), 768-786. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00314
53. Johnson, J. S., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2009). A layered neural architecture for the consolidation, maintenance, and updating of representations in visual working memory. Brain Research, 1299, 17-32. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.008
54. Johnson, S. P. (2010a). Development of visual perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5), 515-528. doi:10.1002/ wcs.128
55. Johnson, S. P. (2010b). Perceptual completion in infancy. In Neoconstructivism: The New Science of Cognitive Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Kohonen, T. (1998). The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 21(1-3), 1-6. doi:10.1016/ S0925-2312(98)00030-7
57. Kovack-Lesh, K. A., Horst, J. S., & Oakes, L. M. (2008). The cat is out of the bag: The joint influence of previous experience and looking behavior on infant categorization. Infancy, 13(4), 285-307. doi:10.1080/15250000802189428
58. Kovack-Lesh, K. A., & Oakes, L. M. (2007). Hold your horses: How exposure to different items influences infant categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(2), 69-93. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.05.001
59. Kucker, S. C., & Samuelson, L. K. (2011). The first slow step: Differential effects of object and word-form familiarization on retention of fast-mapped words. Infancy, 17(3), 295-323. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00081.x
60. Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3(3), 299-321. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7
61. Mareschal, D., French, R. M., & Quinn, P. C. (2000). A connectionist account of asymmetric category learning in early infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 635. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.5.635
62. Mareschal, D., Quinn, P. C., & French, R. M. (2002). Asymmetric interference in 3-to 4-month-olds' sequential category learning. Cognitive Science, 26(3), 377-389. doi:10.1207/ s15516709cog2603_8
63. Markman, E. M. (1994). Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. Lingua, 92(1-4), 199-227. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(94)90342-5
64. Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meaning of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121-157. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5
65. Mather, E., & Plunkett, K. (2009). Learning words over time: The role of stimulus repetition in mutual exclusivity. Infancy, 14(1), 60-76. doi:10.1080/15250000802569702
66. Mayor, J., & Plunkett, K. (2010). A neurocomputational account of taxonomic responding and fast mapping in early word learning. Psychological Review, 117(1), 1-31. doi:10.1037/a0018130
67. McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Using your lexicon at two timescales: Investigating the interplay of word learning and word recognition. Unpublished
68. McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009). Connectionist Learning and dynamic processing: Symbiotic developmental mechanism. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M., & Mc-Clelland, J. (Eds.), Towards a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Reconsidered (pp. 218-249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0011
69. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
70. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75-78. doi:10.1126/ science.198.4312.75
71. Merriman, W. E., & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54(3-4).
72. Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., & Fadiga, L. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 1125-1134. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010
73. Morse, A. F., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., & Floccia, C. (2011). Modeling U shaped performance curves in ongoing development. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 3034-3039). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
74. Morse, A. F., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., & Smith, L. B. (2010a). Thinking with your body: Modelling spatial biases in categorization using a real humanoid robot. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX.
75. Morse, A. F., de Greeff, J., Belpeame, T., & Cangelosi, A. (2010b). Epigenetic robotics architecture (ERA). IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2(4), 325-339. doi:10.1109/ TAMD.2010.2087020
76. Munakata, Y., & McClelland, J. L. (2003). Connectionist models of development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 413-429. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00296
77. Munro, N., Baker, E., Mcgregor, K., Docking, K., & Arciuli, J. (2012). Why word learning is not fast. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
78. Murphy, G. L. (2003). Ecological validity and the study of concepts. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 1-41. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01010-7
79. Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
80. Namy, L. L. (2001). What's in a name when it isn't a word? 17-month-olds' mapping of nonverbal symbols to object categories. Infancy, 2(1), 73-86. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0201_5
81. Nosofsky, R. M., & Stanton, R. D. (2006). Speeded oldâ€"new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: Modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 314-334. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.314
82. Oakes, L. M. (2010). Using habituation of looking time to assess mental processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 255-268. doi:10.1080/15248371003699977
83. Oakes, L. M., Madole, K. L., & Cohen, L. B. (1991). Infants' object examining: Habituation and categorization. Cognitive Development, 6(4), 377-392. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(91)90045-F
84. Peniak, M., Morse, A. F., Larcombe, C., Ramirez-Contla, S., & Cangelosi, A. (2011). Aquila: An open-source GPU-accelerated toolkit for cognitive robotics research. Paper presented at the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). San Jose, CA
85. Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Xu, F. (2011). A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development. Cognition, 120(3), 302-321. doi:10.1016/j.cognition. 2010.11.015
86. Perry, L. K., Samuelson, L. K., Malloy, L. M., & Schiffer, R. N. (2010). Learn locally, think globally: Exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1894-1902. doi:10.1177/0956797610389189
87. Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. (2007). How the body shapes the way we think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
88. Plunkett, K., Hu, J. F., & Cohen, L. B. (2008). Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy. Cognition, 106(2), 665-681. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.003
89. Prince, C. G., & Hollich, G. J. (2005). Synching models with infants: A perceptual-level model of infant audio-visual synchrony detection. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(3), 205-228. doi:10.1016/j. cogsys.2004.11.006
90. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
91. Quinn, P. C. (1987). The categorical representation of visual pattern information by young infants. Cognition, 27(2), 145-179. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90017-5
92. Quinn, P. C. (2005). Young infants' categorization of human versus nonhuman animals: Roles for knowledge access and perceptual process. In Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Rakison, D. H. (Eds.), Building Object Cateogries in Developmental Time (pp. 107-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
93. Quinn, P. C., Burke, S., & Rush, A. (1993). Partwhole perception in early infancy: Evidence for perceptual grouping produced by lightness similarity. Infant Behavior and Development, 16(1), 19-42. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(93)80026-5
94. Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22(4), 463-475. doi:10.1068/p220463
95. Rakison, D. H. (2000). When a rose is just a rose: The illusion of taxonomies in infant categorization. Infancy, 1(1), 77-90. doi:10.1207/ S15327078IN0101_07
96. Rakison, D. H., & Yermolayeva, Y. (2011). How to identify a domain-general learning mechanism when you see one. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(2), 134-153. doi:10.1080/152 48372.2010.535228
97. Rao, R. P. N. (2004). Bayesian computation in recurrent neural circuits. Neural Computation, 16(1), 1-38. doi:10.1162/08997660460733976
98. Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(4), 1436-1441. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610341104
99. Ribar, R. J., Oakes, L. M., & Spalding, T. L. (2004). Infants can rapidly form new categorical representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 536-541. doi:10.3758/BF03196607
100. Riches, N. G., Tomasello, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2005). Verb learning in children with SLI: Frequency and spacing effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 48, 1397-1411. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/097)
101. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X0800589X
102. Rogers, T. T., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). U-shaped curves in development: A PDP approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(1), 137-145. doi:10.1207/ s15327647jcd0501_14
103. Samuel, S. (1978). Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentials. Vision Research, 18(1), 33-39. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90074-3
104. Samuelson, L. K. (2002). Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 1016-1037. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.1016
105. Samuelson, L. K., & Horst, J. S. (2008). Confronting complexity: Insights from the details of behavior over multiple timescales. Developmental Science, 11(2), 209-215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00667.x
106. Samuelson, L. K., Smith, L. B., Perry, L. K., & Spencer, J. P. (2011). Grounding word learning in space. PLoS ONE, 6(12). doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0028095
107. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). Filling the gap on developmental change: Tests of a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(3), 328-355. doi:10.1080/15248371003700007
108. Shahidullah, S., & Hepper, P. G. (1994). Frequency discrimination by the fetus. Early Human Development, 36(1), 13-26. doi:10.1016/0378-3782(94)90029-9
109. Simmering, V. R., Triesch, J., Deak, G. O., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). A dialogue on the role of computational modeling in developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 4(2), 152-158. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00134.x
110. Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Kelly, D. J., Lee, K., Longmore, C. A., & McDonald, P. R. (2010). The shaping of the face space in early infancy: Becoming a native face processor. Child Development Perspectives, 4(3), 205-211. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00147.x
111. Slater, A., Von der Schulenburg, C., Brown, E., Badenoch, M., Butterworth, G., & Parsons, S. (1998). Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 345-354. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90011-X
112. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(6), 1411. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1411
113. Smith, L. B. (2000). Learning how to learn words: An associative crane. In Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L. B., Woodward, A. L., & Akhtar, N. (Eds.), Becoming a Word Learner: A Debate on Lexical Acquisition (pp. 51-80). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130324.003.003
114. Smith, L. B., Colunga, E., & Yoshida, H. (2010). Knowledge as process: Contextually cued attention and early word learning. Cognitive Science, 34(7), 1287-1314. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01130.x
115. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13(1), 13-19. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00403
116. Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2010). Objects in space and mind: From reaching to words. In Mix, K. S., Smith, L. B., & Gasser, M. (Eds.), The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199553242.003.0009
117. Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90051-5
118. Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89-96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x
119. Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Bridging the representational gap in the dynamic systems approach to development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 392-412. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00295
120. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
121. Travis, K. E., Leonard, M. K., Brown, T. T., Hagler, D. J., Curran, M., & Dale, A. M. (2011). Spatiotemporal neural dynamics of word understanding in 12- to 18-month-old-infants. Cerebral Cortex, 21(8), 1832-1839. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq259
122. Twomey, K. E., & Horst, J. S. (2011). All things considered: Dynamic field theory captures effect of categories on children's word learning. Paper presented at the Society of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour. York, UK
123. Vernon, D., Metta, G., & Sandini, G. (2007). A survey of artificial cognitive systems: Implications for the autonomous development of mental capabilities in computational agents. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(2), 151-180. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2006.890274
124. Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008). The spacing effect in children's memory and category induction. Cognition, 109(1), 163-167. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013
125. Waxman, S. R., & Booth, A. E. (2001). Seeing pink elephants: Fourteen-month-olds' interpretations of novel nouns and adjectives. Cognitive Psychology, 43(3), 217-242. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0764
126. Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D. (2009). Modelling the transition from perceptual to conceptual organization. Connectionist Models of Behaviour and Cognition, 18, 153-164.
127. Woodward, A. L., & Markman, E. M. (1991). The mutual exclusivity bias in young children's word learning. Developmental Review, 11(2), 137-163. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(91)90005-9
128. Woodward, A. L., Markman, E. M., & Fitzsimmons, C. M. (1994). Rapid word learning in 13-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 553-566. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.4.553
129. Wu, R., Gopnik, A., Richardson, D. C., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2011). Infants learn about objects from statistics and people. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1220-1229. doi:10.1037/a0024023
130. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114(2), 245. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245
131. Younger, B. A., & Cohen, L. B. (1986). Developmental-change in infants perception of correlations among attributes. Child Development, 57(3), 803-815. doi:10.2307/1130356
132. Zeschel, A., & Tuci, E. (2011). From symbol grounding to socially shared embodied language knowledge. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. IEEE Press.
133. Ziemke, T. (2003). What's that thing called embodiment? In Alterman & Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 1134-1139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
134. Horst, J. S., McMurray, B., & Samuelson, L. K. (2006). Online processing is essential for leaning: Understanding fast mapping and word learning in a dynamic connectionist architecture. In Proceedings from the 28th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 339-344). Cognitive Science Society.
135. McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J. C., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009). Integrating connectionist learning and dynamical systems processing: Case studies in speech and lexical development. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider (Vol. 1, pp. 218-251). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0011
136. Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., & Fadiga, L. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 1125-1134. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010
137. Morse, A. F., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., & Smith, L. B. (2010). Thinking with your body: Modelling spatial biases in categorization using a real humanoid robot. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX
138. Morse, A. F., de Greeff, J., Belpeame, T., & Cangelosi, A. (2010). Epigenetic robotics architecture (ERA). IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2(4), 325-339. doi:10.1109/ TAMD.2010.2087020
139. Schlesinger, M. (2009). The robot as a new frontier for connectionism and dynamic systems theory. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Considered (Vol. 1, pp. 182-201). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0009
140. Simmering, V. R., Triesch, J., Deak, G. O., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). A dialogue on the role of computational modeling in developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 4(2), 152-158. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00134.x
141. Tsagarakis, N. G., Metta, G., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Beira, R., & Becchi, F. (2007). iCub: The design and realization of an open humanoid platform for cognitive and neuroscience research. Advanced Robotics, 21(10), 1151-1175. doi:10.1163/156855307781389419