Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: Modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 314-334

  Nosofsky, Robert M ^a   Stanton, Roger D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Exemplar model; Individual participant individual item performance; Old new recognition; Response time; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 33747172730     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.314     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception: II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483-502.
2. Cohen, A. L., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2003). An extension of the exemplar-based random-walk model to separable-dimension stimuli. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 150-165.
3. Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 414-435.
4. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (1995). Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1075-1095.
6. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.
7. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
8. Heit, E. (1993). Modeling the effects of expectations on recognition memory. Psychological Science, 4, 244-252.
9. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
10. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
11. Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B. (1987). A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 94, 341-358.
12. Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177-2192.
13. Lamberts, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161-180.
14. Lamberts, K. (1998). The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 695-711.
15. Lamberts, K. (2000). Information accumulation theory of categorization. Psychological Review, 107, 227-260.
16. Lamberts, K., Brockdorff, N., & Heit, E. (2003). Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 351-378.
17. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
18. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
19. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
20. Nickerson, D. (1936). The specifications of color tolerances. Textile Research, 6, 505-514.
21. Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 384-413.
22. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
23. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
24. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
25. Nosofsky, R. M., & Alfonso-Reese, L. A. (1999). Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: Further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model. Memory & Cognition, 27, 78-93.
26. Nosofsky, R. M., & Kantner, J. (in press). Exemplar similarity, study-list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition. Memory & Cognition.
27. Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., & McKinley, S. C. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 211-233.
28. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
29. Nosofsky, R. M., & Stanton, R. D. (2005). Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: Contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 608-629.
30. Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (2003). A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1194-1209.
31. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Palmed, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 324-354.
33. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
34. Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92, 212-225.
35. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
36. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
37. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
38. Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32, 573-604.
39. Shepard, R. N. (1958). Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 509-523.
40. Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
41. Shepard, R. N. (1987, September 11). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
42. Shepard, R. N., & Chang, J. (1963). Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 94-102.
43. Shiffrin, R. M., Ratcliff, R., & Clark, S. E. (1990). List-strength effect: Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 179-195.
44. Shin, H. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 278-304.
45. Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
46. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.