The Robot as a New Frontier for Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory

Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Schlesinger, Matthew ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectionism; Development; Dynamic systems theory; Robotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921578893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0009     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Acredolo, L. P., Adams, A., and Goodwyn, S. W. (1984). The role of self-produced movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 312-327.
2. Adams, B., Breazeal, C., Brooks, R., & Scassellati, B. (2000). Humanoid robots: A new kind of tool. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(4), 25-30.
3. Bechtel, W. (1997). Embodied connectionism. In D. M. Johnson & C. E. Erneling (Eds.), The future of the cognitive revolution (pp. 187-208). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Beer, R. D. (1996). Toward the evolution of dynamical neural networks for minimally cognitive behavior. In P. Maes, M. J. Mataric, J.-A. Meyer, J. Pollack, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animats: Vol. 4. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 421-429). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
5. Berthier, N. E. Clifton, R. K., McCall, D. D., & Robin, D. J. (1999). Proximodistal structure of early reaching in human infants. Experimental Brain Research, 127(3), 259-269.
6. Bicho, E., Mallet, P., & Schöner, G. (2000). Target representation on an autonomous vehicle with low-level sensors. International Journal of Robotics Research, 19(5), 424-447.
7. Bizzi, E., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Giszter, S. (1991). Computations underlying the execution of a movement: A biological perspective. Science, 253(5017), 287-291.
8. Bjorklund, D. F., & Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist, 47(1), 46-54.
9. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1-3), 139-159.
10. Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D., & Nolfi, S. (1994). Cell division and migration in a 'genotype' for neural networks. Network, 5(4), 497-515.
11. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(2), 82-88.
12. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97(3), 332-361.
13. Dominguez, M., and Jacobs, R. A. (2003). Developmental constraints aid the acquisition of binocular disparity sensitivities. Neural Computation, 15(1), 161-182.
14. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179-211.
15. Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48(1), 71-99.
16. Flash, T. (1987). The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biological Cybernetics, 57(4-5), 257-274.
17. Grupen, R. A. (2003, August). A developmental organization for robot behavior. In C. G. Prince, L. Berthouze, H. Kozima, D. Bullock, G. Stojanov, & C. Balkenius (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems (pp. 25-36), Boston, MA. Lund, Sweden:Lund University Cognitive Studies. Retrieved October 31, 2008, from
18. Hinton, G. E., & Nolan, S. J. (1987). How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems, 1, 495-502.
19. Hiraki, K., Sashima, A., & Phillips, S. (1998). From egocentric to allocentric spatial behavior: A computational model of spatial development. Adaptive Behavior, 6(3-4), 371-391.
20. Hock, H. S., Schöner, G., & Giese, M. A. (2003). The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: Stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(3), 429-457.
21. Husbands, P., Harvey, I., Cliff, D., & Miller, G. (1997). Artificial evolution: A new path for artificial intelligence? Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 130-159.
22. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 307-354.
24. Keijzer, F. A. (1998). Doing without representations which specify what to do. Philosophical Psychology, 11(3), 269-302.
25. Kettner, R., Marcario, J., & Port, N. (1993). A neural network model of cortical activity during reaching. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 14-33.
26. Kopp, S. B. (1972). If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him! The pilgrimage of psychotherapy patients [Series: Bantam new age books]. New York: Bantam.
27. Langton, C. G. (Ed.). (1995). Artificial life: An overview. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
28. Lovett, A., & Scassellati, B. (2004). Using a robot to reexamine looking time experiments. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 284-291). Cambridge, MA: IEEE Press. Retrieved October 27, 2008, from
29. Lungarella, M., & Berthouze, L. (2003). On the interplay between morphological, neural, and environmental dynamics: A robotic case-study. Adaptive Behavior, 10(3-4), 223-241.
30. Lungarella, M., Metta, G., Pfeifer, R., & Sandini, G. (2003). Developmental robotics: A survey. Connection Science, 15(4), 151-190.
31. Mareschal, D., Plunkett, K., & Harris, P. (1999). A computational and neuropsychological account of object-oriented behaviours in infancy. Developmental Science, 2(3), 306-317.
32. Mareschal, D., & Shultz, T. R. (1993). A connectionist model of the development of seriation. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 170-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. McClelland, J. L. (1989). Parallel distributed processing: Implications for cognition and development. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 8-45). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Michel, P., Gold, K., & Scassellati, B. (2004, September). Motion-based robotic selfrecognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 2763-2768). Cambridge, MA: IEEE Press.
35. Miglino, O., & Lund, H. H. (2001). Do rats need euclidean cognitive maps of the environmental shape? Cognitive Processing, 4(2001), 1-9.
36. Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the AB task. Developmental Science, 1(2), 161-184, commentary 184-204, author's response 205-211.
37. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104(4), 686-713.
38. Munakata, Y., & Pfaffly, J. (2004). Hebbian learning and development [Special section/]. Developmental Science, 7(2), 141-148.
39. Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1999). Modular features of motor control and learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9(6), 713-717.
40. Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
41. Nolfi, S., & Floreano, D. (2001). Evolutionary robotics. The biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
42. Nolfi, S., Floreano, D., Miglino, O., & Mondada, F. (1994). How to evolve autonomous robots: Different approaches in evolutionary robotics. In R. Brooks & P. Maes (Eds.), Artificial life: Vol. IV. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (pp. 190-197). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
43. Nolfi, S., & Parisi, D. (1993). Self-selection of input stimuli for improving performance. In G. A. Bekey & K. Y. Goldberg (Eds.), Neural networks in robotics (pp. 403-418). Boston:Kluwer.
44. Nolfi, S., & Parisi, D. (1999). Exploiting the power of sensory-motor coordination. In D. Floreano, J.-D. Nicoud, & F. Mondada (Eds.), Advances in artificial life: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 173-182). New York: Springer.
45. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 461-488.
46. Parisi, D. (1996). Computational models of developmental mechanisms. In R. Gelman & T. K.-F. Au (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive development (pp. 373-412). San Diego:Academic Press.
47. Parisi, D. (1997). Active sampling in evolving neural networks. Human Development, 40, 320-324.
48. Parisi, D., Cecconi, F., & Nolfi, S. (1990). Econets: Neural networks that learn in an environment. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 1(2), 149-168.
49. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). Madison, CT:International Universities Press.
50. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multilayered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38(1), 43-102.
51. Quinn, P. C., & Johnson, M. H. (1997). The emergence of perceptual category representations in young infants: A connectionist analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66(2), 236-263.
52. Schaal, S., Kotosaka, S., & Sternad, D. (2000). Nonlinear dynamical systems as movement primitives. In Proceedings of the First IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robotics. Cambridge, MA: IEEE Press. Retrieved October 31, 2008, from
53. Scheier, C., & Pfeifer, R. (1995). Classification as sensorimotor coordination: A case study on autonomous agents. In F. Morán, A. Moreno, P. Chacón, & J. J. Merelo (Eds.), Advances in artificial life: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 657-667). New York: Springer.
54. Schlesinger, M. (2003). A lesson from robotics: Modeling infants as autonomous agents. Adaptive Behavior, 11(1), 97-107.
55. Schlesinger, M. (2004). Evolving agents as a metaphor for the developing child [Special section/]. Developmental Science, 7(2), 158-164.
56. Schlesinger, M. (2006). Decomposing infants' object representations: A dual-route processing account. Connection Science, 18(2), 207-216.
57. Schlesinger, M., & Parisi, D. (2001a). The agent-based approach: A new direction for computational models of development. Developmental Review, 21, 121-146.
58. Schlesinger, M., & Parisi, D. (2001b). Multimodal control of reaching: Simulating the role of tactile feedback. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation: Special Section on Evolutionary Computation and Cognitive Science, 5(2), 122-128.
59. Schlesinger, M., & Parisi, D. (Section Eds.). (2004). Beyond backprop: Emerging trends in connectionist models of development: An introduction [Special section/]. Developmental Science, 7(2), 131-132.
60. Schlesinger, M., Parisi, D., & Langer, J. (2000). Learning to reach by constraining the movement search space. Developmental Science, 3(1), 67-80.
61. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73(2), 377-404.
62. Schutte, A. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory:Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74(5), 1393-1417.
63. Schweighofer, N., Arbib, M. A., & Kawato, M. (1998). Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements. I. Distributed inverse dynamics control. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10(1), 86-94.
64. Shultz, T. R., Mareschal, D., & Schmidt, W. C. (1994). Modeling cognitive development on balance scale phenomena. Machine Learning, 16(1-2), 57-86.
65. Slocum, A. C., Downey, D. C., & Beer, R. D. (2000). Further experiments in the evolution of minimally cognitive behavior: From perceiving affordances to selective attention. In J.-A. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. L. Roitblat, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animats: Vol. 6. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 430-439). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
66. Simon, T. J. (1998). Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical competence. Developmental Science, 1(1), 71-78.
67. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (Eds.). (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development:Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
68. Sirois, S. (2004). Autoassociator networks: Insights into infant cognition [Special section/]. Developmental Science, 7(2), 133-140.
69. Spencer, J. P., & Thelen, E. (2000). Spatially specific changes in infants' muscle coactivity as they learn to reach. Infancy, 1(3), 275-302.
70. Steinhage, A., & Schöner, G. (1997). Self-calibration based on invariant view recognition:Dynamic approach to navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20(2-4), 133-156.
71. Thelen, E. (2000). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. Infancy, 1(1), 3-28.
72. Thelen, E., & Bates, E. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? [Special section/] Developmental Science, 6(4), 378-391.
73. Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L., B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment:A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1-34, commentary 34-70, authors' response 70-80.
74. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press-Bradford Books.
75. Toussaint, M. (2004). Learning a world model and planning with a self-organizing dynamic neural system. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 16, 929-936. Retrieved October 31, 2008, from
76. Tuci, E., Trianni, V., & Dorigo, M. (2004). 'Feeling' the flow of time through sensorimotor co-ordination. Connection Science, 16(4), 301-324.
77. Turvey, M. T., Fitch, H. L., & Tuller, B. (1982). The Bernstein perspective: Vol. I. The problem of degrees-of-freedom and context-conditioned variability. In J. A. S. Kelso (Ed.), Human motor behavior: An introduction (pp. 239-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(1), 133-142.
80. Vos, J. E., & Scheepstra, K. A. (1993). Computer-simulated neural networks: An appropriate model for motor development? Early Human Development, 34(1-2), 101-112.
81. Wang, R. F., Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1999). Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: A comparison with rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113(3), 475-485.
82. Weng, J., McClelland, J., Pentland, A., Sporns, O., Stockman, I., Sur, M., et al. (2001). Artificial intelligence: Autonomous mental development by robots and animals. Science, 291(5504), 599-600.
83. Weng, J., Zhang, Y., and Chen, Y. (2003, July). Developing early senses about the world:"Object permanence" and visuoauditory real-time learning. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 2710-2715), Portland, OR. Cambridge, MA: IEEE Press. Retrieved October 32, 2008, from
84. Williamson, M. M. (1998). Exploiting natural dynamics in robot control. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Austria: Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies.