Comparing infants' preference for correlated audiovisual speech with signal-level computational models

Developmental Science

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 379-387

  Hollich, George ^a,c   Prince, Christopher G ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGY; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFANT; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SPEECH; VIDEORECORDING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; INFANT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 63749120306     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00823.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R. Flom, R. (2004). Intersensory redundancy guides the development of selective attention, perception, and cognition in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 99 102.
2. Brock, J., Brown, C.C., Boucher, J. Rippon, G. (2002). The temporal binding deficit hypothesis of autism. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 209 224.
3. Butz, T. Thiran, J.-P. (2002). Feature space mutual information in speech-video sequences. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, vol. II (pp. 361 364). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
4. Dodd, B. (1979). Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in- and out-of-synchrony. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 478 484.
5. Driver, J. (1996). Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mis-location of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature, 381, 66 68.
6. Henderson, J.M. (2005). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 498 504.
7. Hollich, G. (2005). SuperCoder (Version1.5) [Computer software] West Lafayette : Purdue University.
8. Hollich, G., Hirsh-Pasek, K. Golinkoff, R. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: an emergentist coalition model of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65 (3, Serial No. 262).
9. Hollich, G., Prince, C., Mislivec, E. Helder, N. (2005). Audiovisual synchrony in language learning. Paper presented at the Xth International Congress for the Study of Child Language.
10. Hollich, G., Newman, R. Jusczyk, P. (2005). Infants' use of synchronized visual information to separate streams of speech. Child Development, 76, 598 613.
11. Kleiner, K.A. Banks, M.S. (1987). Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds face preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 594 600.
12. Loritz, D. (1999). How the brain evolved language. New York : Oxford Press.
13. Lovett, A. Scassellati, B. (2004). Using a robot to reexamine looking time experiments. In J. Triesch T. Jebara (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL 04 pp. 284 291). LaJolla, CA : UCSD Institute for Neural Computation.
14. Mislivec, E.J. (2004). Audio-visual synchrony for face location and segmentation. Undergraduate research opportunity project, University of Minnesota Duluth. Available at: http://www.cprince.com/PubRes/SenseStream
15. Muir, D.W., Clifton, R.K. Clarkson, M.G. (1989). The development of a human auditory localization response: a U-shaped function. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43, 199 216.
16. Newman, R.S. Jusczyk, P.W. (1996). The cocktail party effect in infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1145 1156.
17. Pickens, J., Field, T., Nawrocki, T., Martinez, A., Soutullo, D. Gonzalez, J. (1994). Full-term and preterm infants' perception of face-voice synchrony. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 447 455.
18. Prince, C.G. Hollich, G. (2005). Synching models with infants: A perceptual-level model of infant audio-visual synchrony detection. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 205 228.
19. Prince, C.G., Helder, N.A. Hollich, G.J. (2005). Ongoing emergence: a core concept in epigenetic robotics. In L. Berthouze, F. Kaplan, H. Kozima, H. Yano, J. Konczak, G. Metta, J. Nadel, G. Sandini, G. Stojanov C. Balkenius (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 123 (pp. 63 70).
20. Siegler, R.S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) D. Kuhn R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th edn, pp. 464 510). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
21. Sirois, S. (2005). Hebbian motor control in a robot-embedded model of habituation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2005) (pp. 2772 2777). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
22. Stein, B.E., Wallace, M.W., Stanford, T.R. Jiang, W. (2002). Cortex governs multisensory integration in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8, 306 314.
23. Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M. Kuhl, P.K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 75, 1067 1084.