Acetylation of the transcriptional repressor Ume6p allows efficient promoter release and timely induction of the meiotic transient transcription program in yeast

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 631-642

  Law, Michael J ^a   Mallory, Michael J ^a,c   Mallory Jr , Roland L ^b   Strich, Randy ^a  

^a UMDNJ School of Osteopathic Medicine   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; LYSINE; PHOSPHATE; PROTEIN UME6P; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC BINDING PROTEIN;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY MEIOTIC GENE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ACETYLATION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ACETYLATION; ACETYLTRANSFERASES; ANIMALS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASES; HISTONE DEACETYLASES; MEIOSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84892954807     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00256-13     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Chu S, DeRisi J, Eisen M, Mulholland J, Botstein D, Brown PO, Herskowitz I. 1998. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282:699-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.282 .5389.699.
2. Primig M, Williams RM, Winzeler EA, Tevzadze GG, Conway AR, Hwang SY, Davis RW, Esposito RE. 2000. The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts. Nat. Genet. 26:415-423. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/82539.
3. Strahl BD, Allis CD. 2000. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/47412.
4. Taverna SD, Li H, Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Patel DJ. 2007. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:1025-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1338.
5. Berger SL. 2007. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature 447:407-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05915.
6. Couture JF, Trievel RC. 2006. Histone-modifying enzymes: encrypting an enigmatic epigenetic code. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16:753-760. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.10.002.
7. Kaluarachchi Duffy S, Friesen H, Baryshnikova A, Lambert JP, Chong YT, Figeys D, Andrews B. 2012. Exploring the yeast acetylome using functional genomics. Cell 149:936-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell .2012.02.064.
8. Huisinga KL, Pugh BF. 2004. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 13:573-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097 -2765(04)00087-5.
9. Burgess SM, Ajimura M, Kleckner N. 1999. GCN5-dependent histone H3 acetylation and RPD3-dependent histone H4 deacetylation have distinct, opposing effects on IME2 transcription, during meiosis and during vegetative growth, in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96: 6835-6840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.12.6835.
10. Yoshikawa K, Tanaka T, Ida Y, Furusawa C, Hirasawa T, Shimizu H. 2011. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis of single-gene deletion and overexpression strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28:349-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1843.
11. Vidal M, Gaber RF. 1991. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6317-6327.
12. Vidal M, Strich R, Esposito RE, Gaber RF. 1991. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6306-6316.
13. Strich R, Slater MR, Esposito RE. 1989. Identification of negative regulatory genes that govern the expression of early meiotic genes in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86:10018-10022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073 /pnas.86.24.10018.
14. VanDemark AP, Kasten MM, Ferris E, Heroux A, Hill CP, Cairns BR. 2007. Autoregulation of the rsc4 tandem bromodomain by gcn5 acetylation. Mol. Cell 27:817-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.018.
15. Mallory MJ, Law MJ, Sterner DE, Berger SL, Strich R. 2012. Gcn5pdependent acetylation induces degradation of the meiotic transcriptional repressor Ume6p. Mol. Biol. Cell 23:1609-1617. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1091/mbc.E11-06-0536.
16. Choi JK, Grimes DE, Rowe KM, Howe LJ. 2008. Acetylation of Rsc4p by Gcn5p is essential in the absence of histone H3 acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:6967-6972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00570-08.
17. Han Q, Lu J, Duan J, Su D, Hou X, Li F, Wang X, Huang B. 2008. Gcn5- and Elp3-induced histone H3 acetylation regulates hsp70 gene transcription in yeast. Biochem. J. 409:779-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042 /BJ20070578.
18. Mallory MJ, Cooper KF, Strich R. 2007. Meiosis-specific destruction of the Ume6p repressor by the Cdc20-directed APC/C. Mol. Cell 27:951- 961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.019.
19. Strich R, Surosky RT, Steber C, Dubois E, Messenguy F, Esposito RE. 1994. UME6 is a key regulator of nitrogen repression and meiotic development. Genes Dev. 8:796-810.
20. Goldmark JP, Fazzio TG, Estep PW, Church GM, Tsukiyama T. 2000. The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p. Cell 103:423-433. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/S0092-8674(00)00134-3.
21. Kurdistani SK, Robyr D, Tavazoie S, Grunstein M. 2002. Genome-wide binding map of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 in yeast. Nat. Genet. 31:248- 254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng907.
22. Kadosh D, Struhl K. 1997. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89:365-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674 (00)80217-2.
23. Mallory MJ, Strich R. 2003. Ume1p represses meiotic gene transcription in S. cerevisiae through interaction with the histone deacetylase Rpd3p. J. Biol. Chem. 278:44727-44734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308632200.
24. Scherer S, Davis RW. 1979. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76:4951-4955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.4951.
25. Longtine MS, McKenzie A, III, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002 /(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10953::AID-YEA2933.3.CO;2-U.
26. Cooper KF, Strich R. 2002. Saccharomyces cerevisiae C-type cyclin Ume3p/Srb11p is required for efficient induction and execution of meiotic development. Eukaryot. Cell 1:66-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC .01.1.66-74.2002.
27. Eberharter A, John S, Grant PA, Utley RT, Workman JL. 1998. Identification and analysis of yeast nucleosomal histone acetyltransferase complexes. Methods 15:315-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.1998.0635.
28. Arcangioli B, Lescure B. 1985. Identification of proteins involved in the regulation of yeast iso-1-cytochrome C expression by oxygen. EMBO. 4:2627-2633.
29. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, Rutz B, Bouveret E, Bragado-Nilsson E, Wilm M, Seraphin B. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24:218-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1183.
30. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rurz B, Wilm M, Mann M, Seraphin B. 1999. A genetic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1030-1032. http://dx .doi.org/10.1038/13732.
31. Dominy JE, Jr, Hwang J, Guo S, Hirschberger LL, Zhang S, Stipanuk MH. 2008. Synthesis of amino acid cofactor in cysteine dioxygenase is regulated by substrate and represents a novel post-translational regulation of activity. J. Biol. Chem. 283:12188-12201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc .M800044200.
32. Mallory M, Law M, Buckingham L, Strich R. 2010. The Sin3p PAH domains provide separate functions repressing meiotic gene transcription in yeast. Eukaryot. Cell 9:1835-1844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00143-10.
33. Marmorstein R, Carey M, Ptashne M, Harrison SC. 1992. DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex. Nature 356:408- 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/356408a0.
34. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL, Jr. 2003. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12:2001- 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.03154503.
35. Dunbrack RL, Jr. 2002. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:431-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00344-5.
36. Dunbrack RL, Jr., Cohen FE. 1997. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 6:1661-1681. http://dx.doi .org/10.1002/pro.5560060807.
37. Sali A, Blundell TL. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006 /jmbi.1993.1626.
38. Meluh PB, Koshland D. 1997. Budding yeast centromere composition and assembly as revealed by in vivo cross-linking. Genes Dev. 11:3401- 3412.
39. Li M, Luo J, Brooks CL, Gu W. 2002. Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2. J. Biol. Chem. 277:50607-50611. http://dx.doi .org/10.1074/jbc.C200578200.
40. De Nadal E, Zapater M, Alepuz PM, Sumoy L, Mas G, Posas F. 2004. The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes. Nature 427:370-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02258.
41. Sabet N, Volo S, Yu C, Madigan JP, Morse RH. 2004. Genome-wide analysis of the relationship between transcriptional regulation by Rpd3p and the histone H3 and H4 amino termini in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 8823-8833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.20.8823-8833.2004.
42. Wang X, Hayes JJ. 2008. Acetylation mimics within individual core histone tail domains indicate distinct roles in regulating the stability of higher- order chromatin structure. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:227-236. http://dx.doi .org/10.1128/MCB.01245-07.
43. Park H-D, Luche RM, Cooper TG. 1992. The yeast UME6 gene product is required for transcriptional repression mediated by the CAR1 URS1 repressor binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:1909-1915. http://dx.doi.org /10.1093/nar/20.8.1909.
44. Jackson JC, Lopes JM. 1996. The yeast UME6 gene is required for both negative and positive transcriptional regulation of phospholipid biosynthetic gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1322-1329. http://dx.doi.org /10.1093/nar/24.7.1322.
45. Law DTS, Segall J. 1988. The SPS100 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated late in the sporulation process and contributes to spore wall maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:912-922.
46. Garber AT, Segall J. 1986. The SPS4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a major sporulation-specific mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:4478- 4485.
47. Ginsburg DS, Govind CK, Hinnebusch AG. 2009. NuA4 lysine acetyltransferase Esa1 is targeted to coding regions and stimulates transcription elongation with Gcn5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:6473-6487. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1128/MCB.01033-09.
48. Lee KK, Workman JL. 2007. Histone acetyltransferase complexes: one size doesn't fit all. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:284-295. http://dx.doi.org /10.1038/nrm2145.
49. Zheng C, Hayes JJ. 2003. Structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains. Biopolymers 68:539-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip .10303.
50. Kontaki H, Talianidis I. 2010. Lysine methylation regulates E2F1- induced cell death. Mol. Cell 39:152-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .molcel.2010.06.006.
51. Ivanov GS, Ivanova T, Kurash J, Ivanov A, Chuikov S, Gizatullin F, Herrera-Medina EM, Rauscher F, III, Reinberg D, Barlev NA. 2007. Methylation-acetylation interplay activates p53 in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6756-6769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB .00460-07.
52. MacPherson S, Larochelle M, Turcotte B. 2006. A fungal family of transcriptional regulators: the zinc cluster proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:583-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00015-06.
53. Marmorstein R, Harrison SC. 1994. Crystal structure of a PPR1-DNA complex: DNA recognition by proteins containing a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster. Genes Dev. 8:2504-2512.
54. Swaminathan K, Flynn P, Reece RJ, Marmorstein R. 1997. Crystal structure of a PUT3-DNA complex reveals a novel mechanism for DNA recognition by a protein containing a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:751-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsb0997-751.
55. King DA, Zhang L, Guarente L, Marmorstein R. 1999. Structure of a HAP1-DNA complex reveals dramatically asymmetric DNA binding by a homodimeric protein. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:64-71. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/4940.
56. Baleja JD, Marmorstein R, Harrison SC, Wagner G. 1992. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of Cd2-GAL4 from S. cerevisiae. Nature 356:450-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/356450a0.
57. Anderson SF, Steber CM, Esposito RE, Coleman JE. 1995. UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a Cterminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1DNAsequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci. 4:1832-1843. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1002/pro.5560040918.
58. Brent MM, Anand R, Marmorstein R. 2008. Structural basis for DNA recognition by FoxO1 and its regulation by posttranslational modification. Structure 16:1407-1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2008.06.013.
59. Matsuzaki H, Daitoku H, Hatta M, Aoyama H, Yoshimochi K, Fukamizu A. 2005. Acetylation of Foxo1 alters its DNA-binding ability and sensitivity to phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:11278- 11283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502738102.
60. Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, Tran H, Ross SE, Mostoslavsky R, Cohen HY, Hu LS, Cheng HL, Jedrychowski MP, Gygi SP, Sinclair DA, Alt FW, Greenberg ME. 2004. Stressdependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science 303:2011-2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science .1094637.
61. Kim JH, Saraf A, Florens L, Washburn M, Workman JL. 2010. Gcn5 regulates the dissociation of SWI/SNF from chromatin by acetylation of Swi2/ Snf2. Genes Dev. 24:2766-2771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2145.
62. Jani NM, Lopes JM. 2008. Transcription regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PIS1 gene by inositol and the pleiotropic regulator, Ume6p. Mol. Microbiol. 70:1529-1539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008 .06506.x.
63. Messenguy F, Vierendeels F, Scherens B, Dubois E. 2000. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of arginine catabolic genes CAR1 and CAR2 in response to exogenous nitrogen availability is mediated by the Ume6 (CargRI)-Sin3 (CargRII)-Rpd3 (CargRIII) complex. J. Bacteriol. 182: 3158-3164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.11.3158-3164.2000.
64. Williams RM, Primig M, Washburn BK, Winzeler EA, Bellis M, Sarrauste de Menthiere C, Davis RW, Esposito RE. 2002. The Ume6 regulon coordinates metabolic and meiotic gene expression in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:13431-13436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas .202495299.
65. Miller JH. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
66. Sikorski R, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.