Inferring selection in partially sequenced regions

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 438-446

  Jensen, Jeffrey D ^a,b   Thornton, Kevin R ^a,c   Aquadro, Charles F ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite likelihood; Natural selection; Recurrent selection; Selective sweeps

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOMICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; GENOME; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 38949155535     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm273     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bauer DuMont V, Aquadro CF. 2005. Multiple signatures of positive selection downstream of notch on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 171:639-653.
2. Beisswanger S, Stephan W, De Lorenzo D. 2006. Evidence for a selective sweep in the wapl region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 172:265-274.
3. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W. 1995. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 140:783-796.
4. Coop G, Griffiths RC. 2004. Ancestral inference on gene trees under selection. Theor Popul Biol. 66:219-232.
5. Durrett R, Schweinsberg J. 2004. Approximating selective sweeps. Theor Popul Biol. 66:129-138.
6. Ewens W. 2004. Mathematical Population Genetics I. Theoretical Introduction, 2nd. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Fay J, Wu C-I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 155:1405-1413.
8. Jensen JD, Bauer DuMont V, Ashmore AB, Gutierrez A, Aquadro CF. 2007. Patterns of variability and divergence at the diminutive gene region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 177:832-840.
9. Jensen JD, Kim Y, Bauer DuMont V, Aquadro CF, Bustamante CD. 2005. Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 170:1401-1410.
10. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. 1989. "The hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 123:887-899.
11. Kauer MO, Dieringer D, Schlotterer C. 2003. A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the "out of Africa" habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 165:1137-1148.
12. Kim Y. 2006. Allele frequency distribution under recurrent sweep selective sweeps. Genetics. 172:1967-1978.
13. Kim Y, Stephan W. 2002. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics. 160:765-777.
14. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet Res. 23:23-35.
15. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, Bustamante CD. 2005. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res. 15:1566-1575.
16. Ometto L, Glinka S, De Lorenzo D, Stephan W. 2005. Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2119-2130.
17. Pool JE, Bauer DuMont V, Mueller JL, Aquadro CF. 2005. A scan of molecular variation leads to the narrow localization of a selective sweep affecting both afrotropical and cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 172:1093-1105.
18. Przeworski M. 2002. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 160:1179-1189.
19. Przeworski M, Coop G, Wall JD. 2005. Signatures of positive selection on standing variation. Evolution. 59:2312-2323.
20. Schlotterer C. 2002. A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps. Genetics. 160:753-763.
21. Stajich ES, Hahn MW. 2005. Disentangling the effects of demography and selection in human history. Mol Biol Evol. 22:63-73.
22. Stephan W, Wiehe THE, Lenz MW. 1992. The effect of strongly selected substitutions on neutral polymorphism: analytical results based on diffusion theory. Theor Popul Biol. 41:237-254.
23. Storz JF, Payseur BA, Nachman MW. 2004. Genome scans of DNA variability in humans reveal evidence for selective sweeps outside of African. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1800-1811.
24. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis. Genetics. 123:437-460.
25. Tenaillon MI, U'Ren J, Tanaillon O, Gaut BS. 2004. Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1214-1225.
26. The International HapMap Consortium. 2005. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 437:1299-1320.
27. Thornton KR, Andolfatto P. 2006. Approximate bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe, bottleneck in non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 172:1607-1619.
28. Thornton KR, Jensen JD. 2007. Controlling the false-positive rate in multilocus genome scans for selection. Genetics. 175:737-750.
29. Thornton KR, Jensen JD, Becquet C, Andolfatto P. 2007. Progress and prospects in mapping recent selection in the genome. Heredity. 98:340-348.
30. Williamson SH, Hernandez R, Fledel-Alon A, Zhu L, Nielsen R, Bustamante CD. 2005. Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:7882-7887.
31. Wright SI, Bi IV, Gaut BS. 2005. The effect of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science. 308:1310-1314.