Individual differences in reading aloud: A mega-study, item effects, and some models

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 113-160

  Adelman, James S ^a   Sabatos DeVito, Maura G ^b   Marquis, Suzanne J ^a   Estes, Zachary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computational modelling; Individual differences; Reading aloud; Visual word recognition; Word naming

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891373324     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adelman J.S. Methodological issues with words. Models and methods, orthography and phonology 2012, Vol. 1:116-138. Psychology Press, Hove, England. J.S. Adelman (Ed.).
2. Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:455-459.
3. Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A. Methods of testing and diagnosing models: Single and dual route cascaded models of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:524-544.
4. Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A. Modeling lexical decision: The form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review 2008, 114:214-227.
5. Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A., Quesada J.F. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science 2006, 17:814-823.
6. Adelman J.S., Marquis S.J., Sabatos-DeVito M.G., Estes Z. The unexplained nature of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2013, 39:1037-1053.
7. Adelman, J. S., Sabatos-DeVito, M. G., & Marquis, S. J. (in preparation). Individual differences in word naming: External predictors of item effects.
8. Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancyα. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:234-254.
9. Andrews S. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:439-461.
10. Andrews S. Individual differences in skilled visual word recognition and reading: The role of lexical quality. Meaning and context, individuals and development 2012, Vol. 2. Psychology Press, Hove, England.
11. Andrews S., Hersch J. Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010, 139:299-318.
12. Andrews S., Scarratt D.R. Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirdsα. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1052-1086.
13. Ashby J., Rayner K., Clifton C. The reading patterns of highly-skilled and average readers: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A:1065-1086.
14. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2).
15. Balota D.A., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall S.D., Spieler D.H., Yap M.J. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:283-316.
16. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Hutchison K.I., Kessler B., Loftis B., et al. The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:445-459.
17. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Hutchison K.A., Cortese M.J. Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processingα. Models and methods, orthography and phonology 2012, Vol. 1:90-115. Psychology Press, Hove, England.
18. Besner D. Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia 1999, 413-458. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R.M. Klein, P. McMullen (Eds.).
19. Besner D., Moroz S., O'Malley S. On the strength of connections between localist mental modules as a source of frequency-of-occurrence effects. Psychological Science 2011, 22:393-398.
20. Besner D., Twilley L., McCann R.S., Seergobin K. On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessaryα. Psychological Review 1990, 97:432-446.
21. Blais C., Besner D. Reading aloud: When the effects of stimulus quality distinguish between cascaded and thresholded components. Experimental Psychology 2007, 54:215-224.
22. Brown S.D., Heathcote A. Averaging learning curves across and within participants. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 2003, 35:11-21.
23. Brysbaert M., New B. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:977-990.
24. Butler B., Hains S. Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:68-76.
25. Castles A., Davis C., Cavalot P., Forster K. Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2007, 97:165-182.
26. Chang Y.-N., Furber S., Welbourne S. "Serial" effects in parallel models of reading. Cognitive Psychology 2012, 64:267-291.
27. Chateau D., Jared D. Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:143-153.
28. Coltheart M. Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia. Deep dyslexia 1980, 197-226. Routledge, London. M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, J.C. Marshall (Eds.).
29. Coltheart M. Dual-route theories of reading aloud. Models and methods, orthography and phonology 2012, Vol. 1:3-27. Psychology Press, Hove, England. J.S. Adelman (Ed.).
30. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 1993, 100:589-608.
31. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. Access to the internal lexicon. Attention and performance VI 1977, 535-555. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Dornič (Ed.).
32. Coltheart M., Rastle K. Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1197-1211.
33. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
34. Cortese M.J., Khanna M.M. Age of acquisition ratings for 3000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:791-794.
35. Davis C.J. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 2010, 117:713-758.
36. Diependale K., Lemhöfer K., Brysbaert M. The word frequency in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2013, 66:843-863.
37. Estes W.K. The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin 1956, 53:134-140.
38. Forster K.I. Accessing the mental lexicon. New approaches to language mechanisms 1976, 257-287. North-Holland, Amsterdam. E. Walker, R.J. Wales (Eds.).
39. Forster K.I. A parallel activation model with a sequential twist. Models and methods, orthography and phonology 2012, Vol. 1:52-69. Psychology Press, Hove, England.
40. Forster K.I., Chambers S.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12:627-635.
41. Frederiksen J.R., Kroll J.F. Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1976, 2:361-379.
42. Glushko R.J. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:674-691.
43. Grainger J., Muneaux M., Farioli F., Ziegler J.C. Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A:981-998.
44. Grainger J., van Heuven W. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-24. Nova Science, New York. P. Bonin (Ed.).
45. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528.
46. Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 36:505-529.
47. Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:723-750.
48. Jared D., McRae K., Seidenberg M.S. The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:687-715.
49. Kinoshita S. Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:668-673.
50. Kuperman V., Van Dyke J. Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 65:42-73.
51. Mathey S. L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaisance des mots écrits [The influence of orthographic neighbourhood on visual word recognition]. Revue Candienne de Psychologie Expérimentale/Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 55:1-23.
52. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
53. McClung N.A., O'Donnell C.R., Cunningham A.E. Orthographic learning and the development of visual word recognition. Meaning and context, individuals and development 2012, Vol. 2:173-195. Psychology Press, Hove, England.
54. Morton J. A preliminary functional model for language behaviour. International Audiology 1964, 3:216-225.
55. Mousikou P., Coltheart M., Finkbeiner M., Saunders S. Can the drc computational model of reading offer a valid account of the masked onset priming effectα. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:984-1003.
56. Mulatti C., Reynolds M.G., Besner D. Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: New findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:799-810.
57. Peereman R., Content A. Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:382-410.
58. Perfetti C.A. The representation problem in reading acquisition. Reading acquisition 1992, 145-174. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. P.B. Gough, L. Ehri, R. Treiman (Eds.).
59. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
60. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology 2010, 61:106-151.
61. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
62. Pritchard S.C., Coltheart M., Palethorpe S., Castles A. Nonword reading: Comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:1268-1288.
63. Rastle K., Brysbaert M. Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they realα Do they matterα. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53:97-145.
64. Rastle K., Coltheart M. Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:482-503.
65. Rastle K., Coltheart M. Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 3-24. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Andrews (Ed.).
66. Reynolds M., Besner D. Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: New insights from simulations with the DRC model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 56:310-318.
67. Reynolds M., Besner D. Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 58:13-31.
68. Roberts M.A., Rastle K., Coltheart M., Besner D. When parallel processing in visual word processing is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:405-414.
69. Sears C.R., Siakaluk P.D., Chow V., Buchanan L. Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effectα. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2008, 37:269-291.
70. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
71. Seidenberg M.S., Plaut D.C. Progress in understanding word reading: Data fitting versus theory building. From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing 2006, 25-49. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Andrews (Ed.).
72. Seidenberg M.S., Waters G.S., Barnes M.A., Tanenhaus M.K. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1984, 23:383-404.
73. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science 1997, 8:411-416.
74. Spieler D.H., Balota D.A. Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2000, 15:225-231.
75. Taylor T.E., Lupker S.J. Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:117-138.
76. Thompson G.B., Connelly V., Fletcher-Flinn C.M., Hodson S.J. The nature of skilled adult reading varies with type of instruction in childhood. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:223-234.
77. Weekes B.S. Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1997, 50A:439-456.
78. Yap M.J., Balota D.A., Sibley D.E., Ratcliff R. Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:53-79.
79. Yarkoni T., Balota D., Yap M. Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:971-979.
80. Yates M. Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:1385-1397.
81. Zevin J.D., Seidenberg M.S. Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:145-160.
82. Ziegler J.C., Castel C., Pech-Georgel C., George F., Alario F.X., Perry C. Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition 2008, 107:151-178.
83. Zorzi M. Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:847-856.
84. Zorzi M., Houghton G., Butterworth B. Two routes or one in reading aloudα A connectionist dual-route model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1131-1161.