Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 455-459

  Adelman, James S ^a   Brown, Gordon D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548359364     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194088     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. ANDREWS, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. ANDREWS, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
4. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. BALOTA, D. A., CORTESE, M. J., HUTCHISON, K. A., NEELY, J. H., NELSON, D., SIMPSON, G. B., ET AL. (2000). The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://elexicon.wustl.edu.
6. BALOTA, D. A., CORTESE, M. J., SERGENT-MARSHALL, S. D., SPIELER, D. H., & YAP, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.
7. BALOTA, D. A., & SPIELER, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 238-240.
8. BALOTA, D. A., YAP, M. J., CORTESE, M. J., HUTCHISON, K. I., KESSLER, B., LOFTIS, B., ET AL. (in press). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods.
9. BROWN, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory á Language, 16, 1-23.
10. CHATEAU, D., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis and time-criterion accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 139-151.
11. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. CUTLER, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65-70.
14. JACOBS, A. M., & GRAINGER, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
15. KAY, J., & BISHOP, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. KWANTES, P., & MEWHORT, D. J. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 306-315.
17. MATHEY, S. (2001). L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaisance des mots écrits [The influence of orthographic neighborhood on visual word recognition]. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale/Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1-23.
18. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
19. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation- verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
20. PEEREMAN, R., & CONTENT, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 21, 409-421.
21. PEEREMAN, R., & CONTENT, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 382-410.
22. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
23. REICHER, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
24. REYNOLDS, M., & BESNER, D. (2002). Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: New insights from simulations with the DRC model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 310-318.
25. SEARS, C R., HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1999). Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 220-229.
26. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
27. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & WATERS, G. S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 489.
28. SNODGRASS, J. G., & MINTZER, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Memory & Cognition, 21, 247-266.
29. SPIELER, D. H., & BALOTA, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
30. WHEELER, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
31. YATES, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1385-1397.
32. YATES, M., LAWRENCE LOCKER, J., & SIMPSON, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 452-457.
33. ZIEGLER, J., PERRY, C., JACOBS, A., & BRAUN, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379-384.
34. ZORZI, M., HOUGHTON, G., & BUTTERWORTH, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-route model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131-1161.