Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded computational model

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-31

  Reynolds, Michael ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERIODICITY; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 2342641599     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087437     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Balota, D. A., & Abrams, R. A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1289-1302.
5. Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 252-259.
6. Besner, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 413-458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Besner, D., Reynolds, M., & Chang, K. (2003). Basic processes in reading: Evolution of the Dual Route Cascaded model. Paper presented at the 13th meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Hamilton, ON.
8. Besner, D., & Roberts, M. (2003). Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the Dual Route Cascaded model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 398-404.
9. Besner, D., Roberts, M., & Reynolds, M. G. (2001, November). Explorations in connectionist modelling: Another look at the Dual Route Cascaded model. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
10. Besner, D., & Smith, M. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
11. Besner, D., & Swan, M. (1982). Models of lexical access in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 313-325.
12. Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
13. Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2002). Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 402-422.
14. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches, Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
15. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performancé VI (pp. 535-555). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DEC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
17. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
18. Herdman, C. M., Chernecki, D., & Norris, D. (1999). Naming cAsE aLtErNaTeD Words. Memory and Cognition, 27, 254-266.
19. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling from the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311-1334.
20. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
21. Johnston, J. J. (1981). Effects of advance precuing of alternatives on the perception of letters alone and in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 560-572.
22. Loftus, G., & Masson, M. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
23. McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987), Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
24. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
25. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981), An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
26. Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 98-118). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Norris, D. (1984). The effects of frequency, repetition and stimulus quality in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 507-518.
28. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
29. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
30. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 409-421.
31. Plaut, D.C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
32. Plourde, C., & Besner, D. (1997), On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 181-194.
33. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
34. Reynolds, M. & Besner, D. (2002). Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: New insights from simulations with the DRC model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 310-318.
35. Richman, H. B., & Simon, H. A. (1989). Context effects in letter perception: Comparison of two theories. Psychological Review, 96, 417-432.
36. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17.
37. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900.
38. Smith, M. C., & Besner, D. (2001). Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 111-117.
39. Speller, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bring computational models of word naming down to the word level. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.
40. Stanners, R. F., Jastrzembski, J. E., & Westbrook, A. (1975). Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 259-264.
41. Stolz, J. A., & Neely, J. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
42. VanSelst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
43. Visser, T. A., & Besner, D. (2001). On the dominance of whole-word knowledge in reading aloud. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 560-567.