Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations?

From Inkmarks to Ideas: Current Issues in Lexical Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-24

  Rastle, Kathleen ^a   Coltheart, Max ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908933806     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203841211     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Baron, J. (1977). Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the connection between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
3. Bibi, U., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2000). Stroop effect in words that differ from color words in one letter only. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 7, 678-683.
4. Blazely, A., Coltheart, M., & Casey, B. (2005). Semantic dementia with and without surface dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 695-717.
5. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood, (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.
6. Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1153-1171.
7. Coltheart, M. (2005). Modelling reading: The dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud:Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
10. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
11. Coltheart, M., Woollams, A., Kinoshita, S., & Perry, C. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 456-463.
12. Cortese, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 652-665.
13. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 12, 627-635.
14. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1-25.
15. Gold, B. T., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Snyder, A. Z., Salat, D. H., et al. (2005). Differing neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of abnormal reading in early-stage semantic dementia and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia, 43, 833-846.
16. Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
17. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
18. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 71-92.
19. Havelka, J., & Rastle, K. (2005). The assembly of phonology from print is serial and subject to strategic control: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 148-158.
20. Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689-739.
21. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
22. Joubert, S., & Lecours, A. R. (1998). The effect of graphemic parsing in nonword reading. Brain and Cognition, 37, 97-99.
23. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 862-885.
24. Kinoshita, S. (2000). The left-to-right nature of the masked onset priming effect in naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 133-141.
25. Kinoshita, S. (2003). The nature of masked onset priming effects in naming: A review. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 223-238). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
26. Kostić, D. (1999). Frekvencijski recnik savremenog srpskog jezika [Frequency dictionary of contemporary Serbian language]. Yugoslavia: Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology and Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, University of Belgrade.
27. Lambon Ralph, M., Ellis, A. W., & Franklin, S. (1995). Semantic loss without surface dyslexia. Neurocase, 1, 363-369.
28. Lambon Ralph, M., Ellis, A. W., & Sage, K. (1998). Word meaning blindness revisited. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 389-400.
29. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Sage, K., & Ellis, A. W. (1996). Word meaning blindness:A new form of acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 617-639.
30. Law, S.-P., Wong, W., & Chiu, K. M. Y (2005). Preserved reading aloud with semantic deficits: Evidence for a non-semantic lexical route for reading Chinese. Neurocase, 11, 167-175.
31. Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Effects of frequency and phonological ambiguity on naming Serbo-Croatian words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1-16.
32. Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.
33. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
34. Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2002). On the nature of phonological assembly: Evidence from backward masking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 31-59.
35. Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 767-808.
36. Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 107, 786-823.
37. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
38. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
39. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 461-481.
40. Rey, A., & Schiller, N. O. (2005). Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 33, 76-85.
41. Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1-B12.
42. Roberts, M. A., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Besner, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 10, 405-414.
43. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
44. Ward, J., Stott, R., & Parkin, A. J. (2000). The role of semantics in reading and spelling:Evidence for the "summation hypothesis". Neuropsychologia, 38, 1643-1653.
45. Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and non-word naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.
46. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379-384.
47. Zorzi, M. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 847-856.
48. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.