Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect?

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 269-291

  Sears, Christopher R ^a   Siakaluk, Paul D ^b   Chow, Verna C ^a   Buchanan, Lori ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Neighborhood size; Phonology; Print exposure; Reader skill; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING;

HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 43349093206     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-008-9071-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andrews S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 802-814
2. Andrews S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 234-254
3. Andrews S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4: 439-461
4. Ashby J., Rayner K., Clifton C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A: 1065-1086
5. Balota D.A. (1990). The role of meaning in word recognition. In: Balota D.A., Flores d'Arcaise G.B., Rayner K. (eds) Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale HJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 9-32
6. Balota D.A., Chumbley J.I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 340-357
7. Balota D.A., Chumbley J.I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language 24: 89-106
8. Bell L.C., Perfetti C.A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 244-255
9. Berent I., Perfetti C.A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review 102: 146-184
10. Bräten I., Lie A., Andreassen R., Olaussen B.S. (1999). Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third-and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11: 65-88
11. Brown J.I., Bennett J.M., Hanna G. (1981). The Nelson-Denny reading test. Chicago, The Riverside Publishing Company
12. Chateau D., Jared D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory and Cognition 28: 143-153
13. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J.T., Besner D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In: Dornic S. (eds) Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 535-555
14. Forster K.I. (1987). Form priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In: Coltheart M. (eds) Attention and performance XII. Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 201-219
15. Forster K.I., Davis C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 1-25
16. Forster K.I., Shen D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 696-713
17. Frost R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123: 71-99
18. Gibbs P., Van Orden G.C. (1998). Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 1162-1187
19. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple-read out model. Psychological Review 103: 518-565
20. Hino Y., Lupker S.J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22: 1331-1356
21. Hino Y., Lupker S.J. (1998). The effects of word frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 1431-1453
22. Hino Y., Lupker S.J. (2000). The effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 166-183
23. Jared D., Levy B.A., Rayner K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128: 219-264
24. Kucera H., Francis W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI, Brown University Press
25. Lewellen M.J., Goldinger S.D., Pisoni D.B., Greene B.G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122: 316-330
26. McCann R.S., Besner D., Davelaar E. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14: 693-706
27. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88: 375-407
28. Monsell S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects. In: Besner D., Humphreys G.W. (eds) Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. Hillsdale NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 148-197
29. Perfetti C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY, Oxford University Press
30. Perfetti C.A., Hart L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In: Gorfien D. (eds) On the consequences of meaning selection. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, pp. 67-86
31. Perfetti C.A., Hart L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In: Vehoeven L., Elbro C., Reitsma P. (eds) Precursors of functional literacy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 189-213
32. Pexman P.M., Lupker S.J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 53: 323-334
33. Pexman P.M., Lupker S.J., Jared D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 139-156
34. Pexman P.M., Lupker S.J., Reggin L.D. (2002). Phonological effects in visual word recognition: Investigating the impact of feedback activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 28: 572-584
35. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103: 56-115
36. Reynolds M., Besner D. (2005). Basic processes in reading: A critical review of pseudohomophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12: 622-646
37. Sears C.R., Hino Y., Lupker S.J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 876-900
38. Sears C.R., Hino Y., Lupker S.J. (1999). Orthographic neighborhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 53: 220-229
39. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96: 521-568
40. Seidenberg M.S., Petersen A., MacDonald M.C., Plaut D.C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 48-62
41. Siakaluk P.D., Sears C.R., Lupker S.J. (2002). Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: The effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28: 661-681
42. Solso R.L., Juel C.L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 12: 297-343
43. Stanovich K.E., Cunningham A.E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition 20: 51-68
44. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402-433
45. Stone G.O., Van Orden G.C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19: 744-774
46. Unsworth S.J., Pexman P.M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56A: 63-81
47. Vanhoy M., Van Orden G.C. (2001). Pseudohomophones and word recognition. Memory and Cognition 29: 522-529
48. Van Orden G.C., Pennington B.F., Stone G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review 97: 488-522
49. Ziegler J.C., Jacobs A.M., Kluppel D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27: 547-559