Sequential Effects in Naming: A Time-Criterion Account

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 117-138

  Taylor, Tamsen E ^a   Lupker, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; RECALL; RESPONSE TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; READING; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 85047682623     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.117     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644-652.
2. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 115-124.
3. Buchanan, L., & Besner, D. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of a whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133-152.
4. Casini, L., & Macar, F. (1997). Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812-818.
5. Chastain, G., & Ferraro, F. R. (1997). Duration ratings as an index of processing resources required for cognitive tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 124, 49-76.
6. Chaston, A., & Kingstone, A. (1998, June). Time estimation and attention. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
7. Colombo, L., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). Strategic shifts in processing in naming Italian words. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Colombo, L., & Tabossi, P. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 319-340). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 112-174). New York: Academic Press.
10. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
11. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press.
12. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
13. Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391-402.
14. Decker, G., Simpson, G. B., Yates, M., & Adamopoulos, A. C. (1999, November). Flexible use of lexical and phonological information in word recognition. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
15. Dorfman, D., & Glanzer, M. (1988). List composition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 633-648.
16. Forster, K. I. (1981). Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 190-203.
17. Gibbs, P., & Van Orden, G. C. (1998). Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1162-1187.
18. Glanzer, M., & Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 381-398.
19. Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
20. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
21. Jared, D. (1997). Evidence that strategy effects in word naming reflect changes in output timing rather than changes in processing route. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1424-1438.
22. Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 862-885.
23. Keefe, D. E., & Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies. Memory & Cognition, 18, 289-298.
24. Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 719-750.
25. Kiger, J. I., & Glass, A. L. (1981). Context effects in sentence verification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 688-700.
26. Kinoshita, S., & Woollams, A. (2000). The left-to-right regularity effect and strategy effects in naming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
28. Laming, D. (1973). Mathematical psychology. New York: Academic Press.
29. Lima, S. D., & Huntsman, L. A. (1997). Sequential dependencies in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 60, 264-269.
30. Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105.
31. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 570-590.
32. Lupker, S. J., & Theios, J. (1975). Tests of two classes of models for choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 137-146.
33. McClain, L. (1983). Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 185-189.
34. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
35. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 53, 13-24.
36. Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 131-181). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37. Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-157.
38. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
39. Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
40. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
41. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
42. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
43. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
44. Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552-572.
45. Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92, 212-225.
46. Remington, R. J. (1969). Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 250-257.
47. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (1994). The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 319-331.
49. Sperling, G., & Dosher, B. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 2-1-2-65). New York: Wiley.
50. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 744-774.
51. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994a). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
52. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994b). Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 342-365.
53. Tabossi, P., & Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory & Cognition, 20, 303-313.
54. Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401-409.
55. Taylor, T. E. (1997). Strategic effects in naming: Effects of the time criterion. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
56. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111.
57. Warm, J. S., & McCray, R. E. (1969). Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 56-58.
58. West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 385-399.
59. Zevin, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 121-135.