Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 53-79

  Yap, Melvin J ^a   Balota, David A ^b   Sibley, Daragh E ^c   Ratcliff, Roger ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion model; Ex Gaussian analysis; Individual differences; Response time distributional analysis; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPEECH;

ADULT; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84862669561     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024177     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Think and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Andrews, S., & Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and taskspecific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 514-544.
5. Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1065-1086.
6. Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. F., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 496-512.
7. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
8. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
9. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 336-345.
10. Balota, D. A., & Ferraro, F. R. (1996). Lexical, sublexical, and implicit memory processes in healthy young and healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 10, 82-95.
11. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9, 238-241.
12. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Lexicality, frequency and repetition effects: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32-55.
13. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 160-166.
14. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., . . . Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.
15. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2008). Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 495-523.
16. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
17. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.
18. Brown, P., Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 537-554.
19. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2003). QMLE: Fast, robust and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 485-492.
20. Butler, B., & Hains, S. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory & Cognition, 7, 68-76.
21. Castel, A. D., Balota, D. A., Hutchison, K. A., Logan, J. M., & Yap, M. J. (2007). Spatial attention and response control in healthy younger and older adults and individuals with Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for disproportionate selection impairments in the Simon task. Neuropsychology, 21, 170-182.
22. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
23. Cerella, J. (1990). Aging and information processing rate. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 201-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Cerella, J. (1991). Age effects may be global, not local: Comment on Fisk and Rogers (1991). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 215-223.
25. Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143-153.
26. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
28. Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567-587.
29. Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance: Or will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments in 1990? Cognition, 10, 65-70.
30. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice. Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
31. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
32. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777-799.
33. Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167-183.
34. Frost, S. J., Landi, N., Mencl, W. E., Sandak, R., Fulbright, R. K., Tejada, E. T., . . . Pugh, K. R. (2009). Phonological awareness predicts activation patterns for print and speech. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 78-97.
35. Goh, W. D., Suárez, L., Yap, M. J., & Tan, S. H. (2009). Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and wordfrequency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 882-887.
36. Goodwin, C. J. (2009). Research in psychology: Methods and design (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
38. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347.
39. Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 598-615.
40. Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382-386.
41. Horne, J. A., & Ostberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97-110.
42. Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219-264.
43. Katz, L., Brancazio, L., Irwin, J., Katz, S., Magnuson, J., & Whalen, D. (in press). What lexical decision and naming tell us about reading. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
44. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 145-171.
45. Kimberley, T. J., Khandekar, G., & Borich, M. (2008). fMRI reliability in subjects with stroke. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 183-190.
46. Kinoshita, S., & Hunt, L. (2008). RT distribution analysis of category congruence effects with masked primes. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1324-1334.
47. Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
48. Larson, G. E., & Alderton, D. L. (1990). Reaction time variability and intelligence: A "worst-performance" analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 14, 309-325.
49. Lewellen, M. J., Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Greene, B. G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 316-330.
50. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comparison of three different methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
51. Lowe, C., & Rabbitt, P. (1998). Test/re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: Theoretical and practical issues. Neuropsychologia, 36, 915-923.
52. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, & Computers, 28, 203-208.
54. Lyons, K. E., Kellas, G., & Martin, M. (1995). Interand intra-individual differences in semantic priming among young and older adults. Experimental Aging Research: An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process, 21, 221-237.
55. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798-817.
56. Mcclelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
57. Mcgill, W. J., & Gibbon, J. (1965). The general-gamma distribution and reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 1-18.
58. Miller, G. A. (1990). WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexiography, 3, 235-312.
59. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
60. Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965). A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7, 308-313.
61. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English lexicon project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45-52.
62. Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327-357.
63. Norris, D. (2009). Putting it all together: A unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. Psychological Review, 116, 207-219.
64. Palmer, E. M., Horowitz, T. S., Torralba, A., & Wolfe, J. (2011). What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 58-71.
65. Patterson, K. (1982). The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functioning (pp. 77-112). London, England: Academic Press.
66. Perfetti, C. A. (1983). Individual differences in verbal processes. In F. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 65-104). New York, NY: Academic Press.
67. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68. Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849-894). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
70. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106-151.
71. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1989). Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 153-170.
72. Plaut, D. C., Mcclelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
73. Plourde, C. E., & Besner, D. (1997). On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 181-194.
74. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Pugh, K., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M., . . . Gore, J. C. (1997). Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: The cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 299-318.
76. Rastle, K., Croot, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2005). Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1083-1095.
77. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
78. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
79. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & Mckoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
80. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & Mckoon, G. (2010). Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127-157.
81. Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438-481.
82. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
83. R Development Core Team. (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
84. Rohrer, D., & Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 511-524.
85. Rueckl, J. (2010, November). Are canonical models really canonical? And what if they are not? Paper presented at the Pre-Psychonomics Visual Word Recognition Conference, St. Louis, MO.
86. Salthouse, T. A. (1985). Speed of behavior and its implication for cognition. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (2nd ed., pp. 400-426). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
87. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
88. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414 429.
89. Schwarz, W. (2001). The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times. Behavior Research Methods, 33, 457-469.
90. Sears, C. R., Siakaluk, P. D., Chow, V. C., & Buchanan, L. (2008). Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 269-291.
91. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
92. Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). Lexical access: Another theoretical soupstone? In D. Balota, G. Flores D'arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 33-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Seidenberg, M. S., & Mcclelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
94. Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1980). Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes. In M. Coltheart, K. E. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 119-146). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
95. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). Word frequency effects in high-dimensional co-occurrence models: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 190-195.
96. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2009). A USENET corpus (2005-2009). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/usenetcorpus.download.html
97. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2010). Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 393-413.
98. Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371-377.
99. Sibley, D. E., & Kello, C. T. (2004). A computational exploration of double dissociations: Modes of processing instead of components of processing. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 61-69.
100. Speckman, P. L., & Rouder, J. N. (2004). A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 574-576.
101. Spieler, D. H. (2001). Modeling age-related changes in information processing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 217-234.
102. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 506-526.
103. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Towards an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
104. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
105. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20, 51-68.
106. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1-36.
107. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433.
108. Staub, A., White, S. J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E. C., & Rayner, K. (2010). Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1280-1293.
109. Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29, 41-78.
110. Tainturier, M. J., Tremblay, M., & Lecours, A. R. (1992). Education level and the word frequency effect: A lexical decision investigation. Brain & Language, 43, 460-474.
111. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
112. Trochim, W., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge database (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Atomic Dog.
113. Tse, C.-S., Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Duchek, J. M., & Mccabe, D. P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24, 300-315.
114. Tse, C.-S., Hutchison, K. A., & Li, Y. (2011). Effects of contextual similarity and target-repetition proportion on negative priming in RT distributional analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 180-192.
115. Unsworth, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 63-81.
116. Van Zandt, T. (2000). How to fit a reaction time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 424-465.
117. Wechsler, D. (1997). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace.
118. Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2007). Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 274-296.
119. Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory & Language, 60, 502-529.
120. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2006). Single versus dual process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1324-1344.
121. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Tse, C.-S., & Besner, D. (2008). On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 495-513.
122. Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory & Language, 61, 303-325.
123. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971-979.
124. Zachary, R. A. (1992). Shipley Institute of Living Scale-Revised, manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
125. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models. Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 145-160.