No Time to Waste: Restricting Life-Span Temporal Horizons Decreases the Sunk-Cost Fallacy

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 78-94

  Strough, Jonell ^a   Schlosnagle, Leo ^a   Karns, Tara ^a   Lemaster, Philip ^a   Pichayayothin, Nipat ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heuristics and biases; Money; Social relationships; Sunk costs; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890431288     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1781     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allemand, M. (2008). Age differences in forgiveness: The role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1137-1147.
2. Arkes, H. R. (1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 213-224.
3. Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591-600.
4. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 125-140.
5. Arkes, H. R. & Hutzel, L. (2000). The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 295-306.
6. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
7. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913-1915.
8. Carstensen, L. L., & Charles, S. T. (1998). Emotion in the second half of life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 144-149.
9. Carstensen, L. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). The influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17, 1-10.
10. Carstensen, L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
11. Carstensen, L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.
12. Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383-409.
13. Coleman, M. D. (2009). Sunk cost and commitment to dates arranged online. Current Psychology, 28, 45-54.
14. Ersner-Hershfield, H., Mikels, J. A., Sullivan, S. J., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). Poignancy: Mixed emotional experience in the face of meaningful endings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 158-167.
15. Fredrickson, B. L. (1995). Socioemotional behavior at the end of college life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 261-276.
16. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
17. Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. (2003). Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences in preferences and memory for advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 163-178.
18. Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: Testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 19, 68-78.
19. Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. L. (2006). Goals change when life's fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11th attacks and SARS. Social Cognition, 24, 248-278.
20. Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L., & Lutz, A. M. (1999). The influence of time on social preferences: Implications for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 595-604.
21. Harvey, P., & Victoravich, L. M. (2009). The influence of forward-looking antecedents, uncertainty, and anticipatory emotions on project escalation. Decision Sciences, 40, 759-782.
22. Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). Equity theory in close relationships. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (2nd ed, pp. 200-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment in response to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 38-54.
25. Heilbroner, R. L., & Thurow, L. C. (1981). Understanding microeconomics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Juliusson, A. (2006). Optimism as modifier of escalation of commitment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 345-348.
27. Karlsson, N., Juliusson, Á., Grankvist, G., & Gärling, T. (2002). Impact of decision goal on escalation. Acta Psychologica, 111, 309-322.
28. Kellough, J. L., & Knight, B. G. (2012). Positivity effects in older adults' perception of facial emotion: The role of future time perspective. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 150-158.
29. Klaczynski, P. (2001). Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decision making. Implications for the normative/descriptive gap. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 289-309.
30. Molden, D. C., & Hui, C. M. (2011). Promoting de-escalation of commitment: A regulatory-focus perspective on sunk costs. Psychological Science, 6, 8-12.
31. Moon, H. (2001). Looking forward and looking back: Integrating completion and sunk-cost effects within an escalation-of-commitment progress decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 104-113.
32. Navarro, A. D., & Fantino, E. (2009). The sunk-time effect: An exploration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 252-270.
33. Schwartz, B. (2005, September 9). The sunk-cost fallacy: Bush falls victim to a bad new argument for the Iraq war. Slate. Retrieved April 3, 2012, from http://www.slate.com/id/2125910.
34. Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 169-185.
35. Soman, D. (2004). Framing, loss aversion, and mental accounting. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 379-398). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
36. Soster, R. L., Monga, A., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). Tracking costs of time and money: How accounting periods affect mental accounting. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 712-721.
37. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
38. Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474-494.
39. Strough, J., Karns, T. E., & Schlosnagle, L. (2011). Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 57-74.
40. Strough, J., Mehta, C. M., McFall, J. P., & Schuller, K. L. (2008). Are older adults less subject to the sunk-cost fallacy than younger adults? Psychological Science, 19, 650-652.
41. Strough, J., Schlosnagle, L., & DiDonato, L. (2011). Understanding decisions about sunk costs from older and younger adults' perspectives. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B, 681-686.
42. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
43. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.
44. Ting, H., & Wallsten, T. S. (2011). A query theory account of the effect of memory retrieval on the sunk cost bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 767-773.
45. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 221, 453-458.
46. Van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk-cost fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 33-36.
47. Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2007). The role of anticipated regret in escalation of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 545-554.