Framing effects on adolescent task representations, analytic and heuristic processing, and decision making: Implications for the normative/descriptive gap

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 289-309

  Klaczynski, Paul A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decontextualization; Normative descriptive gap; Rationality; Representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038903370     PISSN: 01933973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00085-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Arkes H.R., Ayton P. The sunk cost and concorde effects: are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin. 125:1999;591-600.
3. Bargh J.A., Chartland T.L. The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist. 54:1999;462-479.
4. Baron J. Rationality and intelligence. 1985;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Baron J. Thinking and deciding. 1988;Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
6. Brynes J.P. The nature and development of decision making. 1998;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
7. Chen S., Chaiken S. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. Chaiken S., Trope Y. Dual-process theories in social psychology. 1999;73-96 Guilford, New York.
8. Cohen L.J. human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 4:1981;317-370.
9. Davidson D. The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy in children's decision making. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 41:1995;328-346.
10. Denes-Raj V., Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66:1994;819-829.
11. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist. 49:1994;709-724.
12. Epstein S., Lipson A., Holstein C., Huh E. Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62:1992;328-339.
13. Epstein S., Pacini R. Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Chaiken S., Trope Y. Dual-process theories in social psychology. 1999;462-482 Guilford, New York.
14. Evans J.B.St.T. Deciding before you think: relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology. 87:1996;223-240.
15. Evans J.B.St.T., Over D.E. Reasoning and rationality. 1996;Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
16. Fischhoff B. Judgment and decision making. Sternberg R.J. The psychology of human thought. 1988;153-187 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
17. Frisch D. Reasons for framing effects. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54:1993;399-429.
18. Gigerenzer G. On narrow norms and vague heuristics: a reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review. 103:1996;592-596.
19. Horn J.L. Organization of data on life-span development of human abilities. Goulet L.R., Baltes P.B. Life-span developmental psychology: research and theory. 1970;424-466 Academic Press, New York.
20. Jacobs J.E., Potenza M. The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: a developmental perspective. Child Development. 62:1991;166-178.
21. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist. 39:1984;581-582.
22. Klaczynski P.A. Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: a two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development. 71:2000;1347-1366.
23. Klaczynski P.A., Gordon D.H. Self-serving influences on adolescents' evaluations of belief-relevant evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 62:1996;317-339.
24. Klaczynski P.A., Narasimham G. Problem representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning. Developmental Psychology. 34:1998;865-881.
25. Kreitler S., Kreitler H. Development of probability thinking in children 5 to 12 years old. Cognitive Development. 1:1986;365-390.
26. Margolis H. Patterns, thinking, and cognition. 1987;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Oaksford M., Chater N. Reasoning theories and bounded rationality. Manktelow K., Over D. Rationality: psychological and philosophical perspectives. 1993;31-60 Routledge, London.
28. Reber A.S., Walkenfeld F.F., Hernstadt R. Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17:1991;888-896.
29. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences. 7:1995;1-75.
30. Reyna V.F., Ellis S.C. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision making. Psychological Science. 5:1994;275-279.
31. Reyna, V. F., Lloyd, F. J., & Brainerd, C. J. (in press). Memory, development, and rationality: an integrative theory of judgment and decision making. In S. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on decision research. Cambridge Univ. Press.
32. Siegler R.S. Emerging minds: the process of change in children's thinking. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
33. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review. 63:1956;129-138.
34. Sloman S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. 119:1996;3-22.
35. Stanovich K.E. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. 1999;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
36. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology. 89:1997;342-357.
37. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 127:1998;161-188.
38. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;645-726.
39. Stein E. Without good reason: the rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive psychology. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
40. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 211:1981;453-458.