Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing

Bilingualism

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 89-117

  Mercier, Julie ^a   Pivneva, Irina ^a   Titone, Debra ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Individual differences; Inhibitory control; Spoken word recognition; Visual world

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889667365     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728913000084     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419-439.
2. Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement controlwithin 100 milliseconds, regardless ofwhether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190-200.
3. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.
4. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don't: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In Henderson & Ferreira (eds.), pp. 347-386.
5. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
6. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Linguistic Data Consortium.
7. Bates, D. M. (2007). Linear mixed model implementation in lme4. Ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison.
8. Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: Standing at the crossroads. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, pp. 171-204. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
9. Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, pp. 417-432. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45, 459-464.
11. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89-129.
12. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. [M.], Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290-303.
13. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. [I. M.], & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859-873.
14. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240-250.
15. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. [M.], & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1341-1354.
16. Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2007). Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eyetracking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 633-660.
17. Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118, 245-257.
18. Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 74-95.
19. Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C.A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K. (2010). Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 669-705.
20. Chertkow, H., Whitehead, V., Phillips, N., Wolfson, C., Atherton, J., & Bergman, H. (2010). Multilingualism (but not always bilingualism) delays the onset of Alzheimer disease: Evidence from a bilingual community. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 24, 118-125.
21. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107.
22. Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113, 135-149.
23. Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59-86.
24. Craik, F. I. [M.], Bialystok, E., & Freedman, M. (2010). Delaying the onset of Alzheimer disease: bilingualism as a form of cognitive reserve. Neurology, 75 (19), 1726-1729.
25. Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269-284.
26. Dahan, D., & Gaskell, G. (2007). The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 483-501.
27. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Timecourse of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317-367.
28. de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 397-428.
29. Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197.
30. Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
31. Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003). Lexical competition in phonological priming: Assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1271-1283.
32. Egner, T. (2011). Right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex mediates individual differences in conflict-driven cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3903-3913.
33. Fischer, B. (1992). Saccadic reaction time: Implications for reading, dyslexia and visual cognition. In Rayner (ed.), pp. 31-45.
34. Gadsby, N., Arnott, W. L., & Copland, D. A. (2008). An investigation of working memory influences on lexical ambiguity resolution. Neuropsychology, 22, 209-216.
35. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
36. Gollan, T. H., Salmon, D. P., Montoya, R. I., & Galasko, D. R. (2011). Degree of bilingualism predicts age of diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in low-education but not in highly educated Hispanics. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3826-3830.
37. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
38. Green, D.W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: The behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-4.
39. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
40. Grosjean, F. (1998). Transfer and language mode. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 175-176.
41. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In J. L. Nicol (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, pp. 1-22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
42. Grosjean, F. (2008). Part IV-Spoken word recognition in bilinguals. In F. Grosjean (ed.), Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 643-657.
44. Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18, 1279-1296.
45. Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and scene perception. In Rayner (ed.), pp. 260-283.
46. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (eds.) (2004). The interface of language, vision, and action: Eyemovements and the visual world. New York: Psychology Press.
47. Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196-208.
48. Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Moser-Mercer, B., & Golestani, N. (2011). Executive control of language in the bilingual brain: Integrating the evidence from neuroimaging to neuropsychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 234.
49. Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 18, 625-658.
50. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing:Areviewand critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151-171.
51. Irwin, D. E. (2004). Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing. In Henderson & Ferreira (eds.), pp. 105-134.
52. Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314-318.
53. Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N. A. (2012). Ageing and bilingualism: Absence of a "bilingual advantage" in Stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 356-369.
54. Krizman, J., Marian, V., Shook, A., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201575109. Published online April 30, 2012.
55. Kroll, J. F. (2008). Juggling two languages in one mind. Psychological Science Agenda, American Psychological Association, 22. http://www.apa.org/ science/about/psa/2008/01/kroll.aspx (accessed February 15, 2013).
56. Kroll, J. F., & Gollan, T. H. (in press). Speech planning in two languages: What bilinguals tell us about language production. In V. Ferreira, M. Goldrick & M. Miozzo (eds.). The Oxford handbook of language production. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). Eye movements and the roles of vision in activities of daily living: Marking a cup of tea. Perception, 28, 1311-1328.
58. Liu, X., Banich, M. T., Jacobson, B. L., & Tanabe, J. L. (2004). Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuro Image, 22, 1097-1106.
59. Luce, P., & Pisoni, D. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
60. Luk, G., Anderson, J., Craik, F. [I. M.], Bialystok, E., & Grady, C. (2010). Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain and Cognition, 74, 347-357.
61. Luk, G., De Sa, E., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588-595.
62. Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31, 133-156.
63. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, K. H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Proficiency and Experience Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing, 50, 940-967.
64. Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003a). Comparing bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 173-193.
65. Marian, V., & Spivey, M. [J.], (2003b). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 6, 97-115.
66. Marian, V., Spivey, M. [J.], & Hirsh, J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence. Brain and Language, 86, 70-82.
67. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
68. Matin, E., Shao, K., & Boff, K. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372-380.
69. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
70. McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2001). Spoken word access processes: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 469-490.
71. Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2009). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189-200.
72. Mercier, J., Sudarshan, A., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2013). Spoken word processing in bilingual older adults. Ms., McGill University.
73. Miyake, A., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1994). Workingmemory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 175-202.
74. Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The antisaccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218-228.
75. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist:Aconnectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
76. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
77. Paradis, M. (2001). An integrated neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (1976-2000). Presented at the LACUS Forum 27, Houston, TX.
78. Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2013). Inhibitory control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Ms., McGill University.
79. Pivneva, I., Palmer, C., & Titone, D. (2012). Inhibitory control and l2 proficiency modulate bilingual language production: Evidence from spontaneous monologue and dialogue speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 57.
80. Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2013). What the eyes tell us about bilingual language production and its link to inhibitory control. Ms., McGill University.
81. Prabhakaran, R., Blumstein, S. E., Myers, E.B., Hutchison, E., & Britton, B. (2006). An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2209-2221.
82. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org./
83. Rayner, K. (ed.) (1992). Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer.
84. Righi, G., Blumstein, S. E., Mertus, J., & Worden, M. S. (2010). Neural systems underlying lexical competition: An eye tracking and fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 213-224.
85. Salverda, A. P., Brown, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). A goalbased perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 172-180.
86. Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., & McDonough, J. (2007). Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. Cognition, 105, 466-476.
87. Saslow, M. G. (1967). Latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1030-1033.
88. Schweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism as a contributor to cognitive reserve: Evidence from brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 48, 991-996.
89. Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attentionshifting and second language proficiency. Memory & Cognition, 33, 644-653.
90. Shook, A., & Marian, V. The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728912000466. Published online by Cambridge University Press, September 5, 2012.
91. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
92. Slowiaczek, L.M., & Hamburger, M. B. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.
93. Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14, 458-472.
94. Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281-284.
95. Strange, W. (1995). Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience, pp. 3-48. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
96. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
97. Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). Spoken language comprehension: Insights from eye movements. In G. Gaskell (eds.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 309-326. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information is spoken-language comprehension. Science, 268 (5217), 1632-1634.
99. Titone, D., & Levy, D. (2004). Lexical competition and spoken word identification in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 68, 75-85.
100. Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412-1431.
101. Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 174.
102. Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780-789.
103. Wagner, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2004). Determining inhibition: Individual differences in the 'lexicon context' trade-off during lexical ambiguity resolution in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 51, 290-299.
104. Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in nonnative spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1-25.
105. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
106. Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2012). Second-language experience modulates first-and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 73-80.
107. Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Investigating bilingual processing: The neglected role of language processing contexts. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 1, 178.
108. Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexicalsemantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 592-612.
109. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1-14.