Quantitative wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 29, Issue , 2014, Pages 508-516

  Koottathape, Natthavoot ^a   Takahashi, Hidekazu ^a   Iwasaki, Naohiko ^a   Kanehira, Masafumi ^b   Finger, Werner J ^b  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Volume loss; Wear damage analysis; Wear resistance

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; RESINS; TESTING; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

COMPOSITE AND WEAR; COMPOSITE RESINS; FILTEK SUPREME; SLIDING CYCLES; TWO-WAY ANOVA; VOLUME LOSS; WEAR DAMAGE; WEAR-TESTING;

WEAR RESISTANCE;

NANOPARTICLE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); RESIN; WATER;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; POPPY SEED SLURRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

COMPOSITE RESIN; VOLUME LOSS; WEAR DAMAGE ANALYSIS; WEAR RESISTANCE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; PAPAVER; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SEEDS;

EID: 84887390735     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bayne S.C., Taylor D.F., Heymann H.O. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent. Mater. 1992, 8:305-309.
2. Brunthaler A., König F., Lucas T., Sperr W., Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin. Oral Invest. 2003, 7:63-70.
3. Condon J.R., Ferracane J.L. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl. Biomater.) 1997, 38:303-313.
4. Da Rosa Rodolpho P.A., Donassollo T.A., Cenci M.S., Loguércio A.D., Moraes R.R., Bronkhorst E.M., Opdam N.J., Demarco F.F. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27:955-963.
5. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear?. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:702-711.
6. DeLong R., Pintado M.R., Douglas W.H., Fok A.S., Wilder A.D., Swift E.J., Bayne S.C. Wear of a dental composite in an artificial oral environment: a clinical correlation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2012, 100B:2297-2306.
7. Demarco F.F., Corrêa M.B., Cenci M.S., Moraes R.R., Opdam N.J.M. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28:87-101.
8. Ferracane J.L. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:689-692.
9. Ferracane J.L. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?. Dent. Mater. 2013, 29:51-58.
10. Frankenberger R., Reinelt C., Krämer N. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results. Clin. Oral Invest. 2013, (published online). 10.1007/s00784-013-0957-8.
11. Garcia-Godoy F., Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Feilzer A.J., Krämer N. Fatigue behavior of dental resin composites: flexural fatigue in vitro versus 6 years in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2012, 100B:903-910.
12. Hahnel S., Schultz S., Trempler C., Ach B., Handel G., Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4:237-244.
13. Hamburger J.T., Opdam N.J.M., Bronkhorst E.M., Kreulen C.M., Roeters J.J.M., Huysmans M.C. Clinical performance of direct composite restorations for treatment of severe tooth wear. J. Adhes. Dent. 2011, 13:585-593.
14. Heintze S.D. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:712-734.
15. Heintze S.D., Zellweger G., Zappini G. The relationship between physical parameters and wear of dental composites. Wear 2007, 263:1138-1146.
16. Heintze S.D., Barkmeier W.W., Latta M.A., Rousson V. Round robin test: wear of nine dental restorative materials in six different wear simulators-supplement to the round robin test of 2005. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27:e1-e9.
17. Heintze S.D., Faouzi M., Rousson V., Özcan M. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28:961-973.
18. Hu X., Shortall A.C., Marquis P.M. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002, 29:756-764.
19. Hu X., Marquis P.M., Shortall A.C. Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of dental composite. J. Oral Rehabil. 2003, 30:729-737.
20. ISO/TS 14569-2, 2001. Technical Specification 14569-2, 2001. Dental Materials-Guidance on Testing of Wear. Part 2. Wear by Two- and/or Three-Body Contact.
21. Jørgensen K.D., Hørsted P., Janum O., Krogh J., Schultz J. Abrasion of class I restorative resins. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 1979, 87:140-145.
22. Koottathape N., Takahashi H., Finger W.J., Kanehira M., Iwasaki N., Aoyagi Y. Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: a methodological investigation. J. Med. Dent. Sci. 2012, 59:53-56.
23. Koottathape N., Takahashi H., Iwasaki N., Kanehira M., Finger W.J. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28:1261-1270.
24. Krämer N., García-Godoy F., Reinelt C., Feilzer A.J., Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities after six years. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27:455-464.
25. Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper. Dent. 1987, 12:53-78.
26. Lambrechts P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:693-701.
27. Lawson N.C., Cakir D., Beck P., Litaker M.S., Burgess J.O. Characterization of third-body media particles and their effect on in vitro composite wear. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28:e118-e126.
28. Palaniappan S., Bharadwaj D., Mattar D.L., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P. Nanofilled and microhybrid composite restorations: Five-year clinical wear performances. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27:692-700.
29. Sarrett D.C. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent. Mater. 2005, 21:9-20.
30. Schirrmeister J.F., Huber K., Hellwig E., Hahn P. Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities. J. Adhes. Dent. 2009, 11:399-404.
31. Takahashi H., Finger W.J., Endo T., Kanehira M., Koottathape N., Komatsu M., Balkenhol M. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am. J. Dent. 2011, 24:264-270.
32. Van Dijken J.W.V. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J. Dent. 2000, 28:299-306.
33. Yesil Z.D., Alapati S., Johnston W., Seghi R.R. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008, 99:435-443.
34. Zantner C., Kielbassa A.M., Martus P., Kunzelmann K.H. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20:277-285.