Fatigue behavior of dental resin composites: Flexural fatigue in vitro versus 6 years in vivo

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 100 B, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 903-910

  Garcia Godoy, Franklin ^a,b   Frankenberger, Roland ^c   Lohbauer, Ulrich ^d   Feilzer, Albert J ^e   Krämer, Norbert ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b FORSYTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

clinical study; flexural fatigue; fracture; marginal fractureIntroduction; resin composites

Indexed keywords

CLASS II; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CLINICAL SERVICES; CLINICAL STUDY; DENTAL RESIN COMPOSITES; DISTILLED WATER; FATIGUE BEHAVIOR; FATIGUE CHARACTERISTICS; FLEXURAL FATIGUE; FLEXURAL FATIGUE LIMITS; FOUR-POINT BENDING; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; MARGINAL FRACTUREINTRODUCTION; OBSERVATION PERIOD; RESIN COMPOSITES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; SEM ANALYSIS; WEAR PATTERN; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

BENDING STRENGTH; DENTAL COMPOSITES; DENTAL MATERIALS; FRACTURE; RATING; RESTORATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

RESINS;

EPOXY RESIN; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FLEXURAL FATIGUE; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPOSITE RESINS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POLYURETHANES; PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH;

EID: 84859598895     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32651     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ferracane JL,. Buonocore Lecture. Placing dental composites - A stressful experience. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 247-257.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F,. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 41D-54D.
3. Hickel R, Manhart J,. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 45-64.
4. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R,. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: In vivo investigations. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 75-81.
5. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G,. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 53-78.
6. Lohbauer U, von der Horst T, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A,. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 435-440.
7. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R,. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
8. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R,. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 639-645.
9. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R,. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
10. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R,. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 237-243.
11. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G,. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 648-653.
12. Braem M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G, Van Doren V, Lambrechts P,. The relationship between test methodology and elastic behavior of composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1036-1039.
13. Braem MJ, Davidson CL, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G,. In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 1397-1402.
14. Sarrett DC,. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 9-20.
15. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL,. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 78: 196-203.
16. Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF,. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 135-142.
17. Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Krämer N,. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: In vitro investigations. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 23-27.
18. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A,. Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 1047-1053.
19. Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G,. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 608-615.
20. Abe Y, Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Inoue S, Takeuchi M, Van MB,. Fatigue behavior of packable composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 3405-3409.
21. Drummond JL, Lin L, Al-Turki LA, Hurley RK,. Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials. J Dent 2009; 37: 321-330.
22. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL,. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
23. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM,. Marginal integrity: Is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 2007; 9 (Suppl 1): 107-116.
24. Garcia-Godoy F, Krämer N, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R,. Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo. Dent Mater. Forthcoming.
25. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B,. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
26. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P,. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - A 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 991-1000.
27. Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G,. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1113-1118.
28. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Garcia-Godoy F, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R,. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: Clinical and microscopic results after 2 years. Am J Dent 2009; 22: 228-234.
29. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Richter G, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R,. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: Clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 750-759.
30. Drummond JL,. Cyclic fatigue of composite restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 509-520.
31. Drummond JL, Bapna MS,. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 226-231.
32. Ferracane JL, Condon JR,. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 262-267.
33. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N,. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 960-968.