Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 399-404

  Schirrmeister, Jörg F ^a   Huber, Karin ^b   Hellwig, Elmar ^a   Hahn, Petra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesive; Ceramic; Clinical trial; Posterior restorations; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CERAMX; K 0127 DENTAL ADHESIVE; K-0127 DENTAL ADHESIVE; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TETRIC CERAM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77649228482     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17633     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y. 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent 2007;32: 3-10.
2. Bagheri R, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Subsurface degradation of resin-based composites. Dent Mater 2007;23: 944-951.
3. Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results. J Dent 2007;35: 163-171.
4. Brännström M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88 Suppl 1: 7-13.
5. Bryant RW, Mahler DB. Modulus of elasticity in bending of composites and amalgams. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56: 243-248.
6. Dietschi D, Magné P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 659-677.
7. Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007;32: 185-192.
8. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 185-194.
9. Geitel B, Kwiatkowski R, Zimmer S, Barthel CR, Roulet JF, Jahn KR. Clinically controlled study on the quality of class III, IV and V composite restorations after two years. J Adhes Dent 2004;6: 247-253.
10. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25: 229.
11. Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, Craig RG. Cytotoxic effects of resin components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1991;70: 1450-1455.
12. Hansel C, Leyhausen G, Mai UE, Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res 1998;77: 60-67.
13. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 45-64.
14. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne SC, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Study design (part I) and criteria for evaluation (part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 2007;9: 121-147.
15. Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N, Hausmann P, Klaiber B. In-vivo-Untersuchung von kleinen Klasse-II-Kompositfüllungen. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2001;111: 11-18.
16. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3: 237-245.
17. Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 2007;32: 45-52.
18. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29: 481-508.
19. Moll K, Park HJ, Haller B. Bond strength of adhesive/composite combinations to dentin involving total- and self-etch adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2002;4: 171-180.
20. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004;32: 379-383.
21. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 430-444.
22. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30: 347-358.
23. Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P. Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10: 181-186.
24. Schweikl H, Schmalz G. Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate induces large deletions in the hprt gene of V79 cells. Mutat Res 1999;438: 71-78.
25. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nanostructured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;78: 196-203.
26. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008;24: 915-922.
27. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities. J Adhes Dent 2005;7: 343-349.
28. Watts DC, Satterthwaite JD. Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon C-factor and composite mass. Dent Mater 2008;24: 1-8.