How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods

Dental Materials

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 712-734

  Heintze, S D ^a  

^a IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG   (Liechtenstein)

Author keywords

GLP; Qualification; Restorative materials; Simulation device; Validation; Wear

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; MASTICATION; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MERCURY AMALGAMS; SIMULATORS;

GLP; QUALIFICATION; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; SIMULATION DEVICES; VALIDATION; WEAR;

WEAR OF MATERIALS;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33745850811     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (181)

1. European Community. Council directive concerning medical devices. Directive 93/42 EEC 1993.
2. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Safety tests (chemical substances, medical devices such as implants, etc.). Directive No. 21 CFR 58-1978.
3. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guideline on general principles of process validation. No. 820 1987.
4. European Community. Tests on chemical substances. Directive 87/18-20/EEC-1987.
5. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) (PART 58 52 FR 33780, 1978. last revision 2004); 1978.
6. ISO. Dental materials-guidance on testing of wear. Part 1. Wear by tooth brushing. Technical Specification 1999; No. 14569-1.
7. ISO. Dental materials-guidance on testing of wear. Part 2. Wear by two-and/or three body contact. Technical Specification 2001; No. 14569-2.
8. Marek M. Interactions between dental amalgams and the oral environment. Adv Dent Res 6 (1992) 100-109
9. Isacsson G., Barregard L., Selden A., and Bodin L. Impact of nocturnal bruxism on mercury uptake from dental amalgams. Eur J Oral Sci 105 (1997) 251-257
10. Gatti A.M. Biocompatibility of micro- and nano-particles in the colon. Part II. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 385-392
11. Gatti A.M., and Rivasi F. Biocompatibility of micro- and nanoparticles. Part I. In liver and kidney. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2381-2387
12. Kunzelmann K.-H. Verschleissanalyse und -quantifizierung von Füllungsmaterialien in vivo und in vitro (1998), Aachen, Shaker Verlag
13. Anusavice K.J. Degradability of dental ceramics. Adv Dent Res 6 (1992) 82-89
14. Morris H.F. Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies Project No. 147. Part IV. Biocompatibility of base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 58 (1987) 1-5
15. Genco R.J. Current view of risk factors for periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 67 (1996) 1041-1049
16. Carlsson G.E., Egermark I., and Magnusson T. Predictors of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a 20-year follow-up study from childhood to adulthood. Acta Odontol Scand 60 (2002) 180-185
17. John M.T., Frank H., Lobbezoo F., Drangsholt M., and Dette K.E. No association between incisal tooth wear and temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 197-203
18. Seligman D.A., Pullinger A.G., and Solberg W.K. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology. J Dent Res 67 (1988) 1323-1333
19. Bernhardt O., Gesch D., Splieth C., Schwahn C., Mack F., Kocher T., et al. Risk factors for high occlusal wear scores in a population-based sample: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 333-339
20. Gesch D., Bernhardt O., and Kirbschus A. Association of malocclusion and functional occlusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Quintessence Int 35 (2004) 211-221
21. Koh H., and Robinson PG. Occlusal adjustment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2002)
22. Gragg K.L., Shugars D.A., Bader J.D., Elter J.R., and White B.A. Movement of teeth adjacent to posterior bounded edentulous spaces. J Dent Res 80 (2001) 2021-2024
23. Shugars D.A., Bader J.D., Phillips Jr. S.W., White B.A., and Brantley C.F. The consequences of not replacing a missing posterior tooth. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 1317-1323
24. Bayne S.C. Dental composites/glass ionomers: clinical reports. Adv Dent Res 6 (1992) 65-77
25. van Dijken J.W. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent 28 (2000) 299-306
26. Granada S., and Hicks R.A. Changes in self-reported incidence of nocturnal bruxism in college students: 1966-2002. Percept Mot Skills 97 (2003) 777-778
27. Attanasio R. An overview of bruxism and its management. Dent Clin North Am 41 (1997) 229-241
28. Hickel R., and Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3 (2001) 45-64
29. Brunthaler A., Konig F., Lucas T., Sperr W., and Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 7 (2003) 63-70
30. El-Badrawy W.A., Leung B.W., El-Mowafy O., Rubo J.H., and Rubo M.H. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. J Can Dent Assoc 69 (2003) 162-167
31. Ekfeldt A., Fransson B., Soderlund B., and Oilo G. Wear resistance of some prosthodontic materials in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 51 (1993) 99-107
32. CRA. Restorative resins: current generation Class 2 resin status report #3. 2-year clinical performance. CRA Newsletter 1996;20:1-3.
33. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., and Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. J Dent 21 (1993) 74-78
34. Barkmeier W.W., Latta M.A., Erickson R.L., and Lambrechts P. Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites. Quintessence Int 35 (2004) 269-274
35. Söderholm K.J., Lambrechts P., Sarrett D., Abe Y., Yang M.C., Labella R., et al. Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods. Eur J Oral Sci 109 (2001) 273-281
36. CRA. Posterior full crowns 2001. Part 2. Resin crowns, 4 year clinical status. CRA Newsletter 2001;25:1-3.
37. Sarrett D.C. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 9-20
38. Pallesen U., and Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest 7 (2003) 71-79
39. Hse K.M., and Wei S.H. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 128 (1997) 1088-1096
40. Luo Y., Lo E.C., Fang D.T., Smales R.J., and Wei S.H. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results. Am J Dent 15 (2002) 403-406
41. Manhart J., Chen H., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 481-508
42. Sorenson J.A., Cruz M.A., and Berge H.-X. In vivo measurement of antagonist tooth wear opposing ceramic bridges. J Dent Res 79 (2000) 172 [Abstract No. 232]
43. Esquivel-Upshaw J.F., Anusavice K.J., Young H., Jones J., Gibbs C., and Yang M. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior FPDs: first-year results. J Dent Res (2003) [Abstract 2633]
44. Etman M.K., Watson T.F., and Woolford M.J. Clinical performance of experimental glass-ceramic posterior crowns: 3D measurement of clinical wear. J Dent Res (2002) [Abstract 1697]
45. Materials ACoD. Posterior composite resins: an update. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;113:950-1.
46. SSO. Qualitätsleitlinien in der Zahnmedizin (2000), SSO, Bern
47. Schindler H.J., Stengel E., and Spiess W.E. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures-a clinical-experimental study. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 330-336
48. Kohyama K., Hatakeyama E., Sasaki T., Dan H., Azuma T., and Karita K. Effects of sample hardness on human chewing force: a model study using silicone rubber. Arch Oral Biol 49 (2004) 805-816
49. Ottenhoff F.A., van der Bilt A., van der Glas H.W., and Bosman F. Control of elevator muscle activity during simulated chewing with varying food resistance in humans. J Neurophysiol 68 (1992) 933-944
50. Shinogaya T., Bakke M., Thomsen C.E., Vilmann A., Sodeyama A., and Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Invest 5 (2001) 63-68
51. Yeh C.K., Johnson D.A., Dodds M.W., Sakai S., Rugh J.D., and Hatch J.P. Association of salivary flow rates with maximal bite force. J Dent Res 79 (2000) 1560-1565
52. Gibbs C.H., Lundeen H.C., Mahan P.E., and Fujimoto J. Chewing movements in relation to border movements at the first molar. J Prosthet Dent 46 (1981) 308-322
53. Krejci I., Reich T., Lutz F., and Albertoni M. In-Vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 (1990) 953-960
54. DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 32-36
55. DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38 (1991) 339-345
56. Leinfelder K.F., Beaudreau R.W., and Mazer R.B. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int 20 (1989) 755-761
57. Leinfelder K.F., and Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc 130 (1999) 1347-1353
58. Zipprich H, Rütters CB, Lauer H-C. Kausimulation-was simulieren wir wirklich? Jahrestagung der Deutsche Gesellschaft für zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde, Kiel 2004; Nr. 23.
59. Heintze S.D., Zappini G., and Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators-results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 304-317
60. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., and Serra M.C. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 641-648
61. Schuurs A.H., Wu M.K., Wesselink P.R., and Duivenvoorden H.J. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part II. Statistical aspects. Int Endod J 26 (1993) 44-52
62. Sarrett D.C., Soderholm K.J., and Batich C.D. Water and abrasive effects on three-body wear of composites. J Dent Res 70 (1991) 1074-1081
63. Lutz F., Krejci I., and Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 1525-1529
64. Ferracane J.L., and Musanje L. Effects of load and antagonist shape on wear of composite. J Dent Res (2003) [Abstract 825]
65. Krejci I., Lutz F., and Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 1413-1416
66. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Effect of antagonist diameter on in vitro wear of dental composite. J Dent Res (2003) [Abstract 954]
67. Krejci I., Albert P., and Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 78 (1999) 713-719
68. Kersten S., Lutz F., and Besek M. Zahnfarbene adhäsive Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich (2001), Eigenverlag PPK, Zürich
69. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 1546-1553
70. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 269-274
71. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 38 (1997) 303-313
72. Shortall A.C., Hu X.Q., and Marquis P.M. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 246-254
73. Ferracane JL, Egge A, Heintze SD. Comparison of antagonists for producing wear of dental composites in the OHSU oral wear simulator. Academy of Dental Materials Annual Meeting; 2003.
74. Shinkai K., Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., and Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 125 (1994) 1467-1472
75. Chadwick R.G. Thermocycling-the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 21 (1994) 533-543
76. Yap A.U., Wee K.E., Teoh S.H., and Chew C.L. Influence of thermal cycling on OCA wear of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 349-356
77. Schnabel C., Kunzelmann K.-H., and Hickel R. The influence of different abrasion media o three-body-wear of composites. J Dent Res (1995) 74 [Abstract Nr. 625]
78. Rosentritt M., Behr M., Hofmann N., and Handel G. In vitro wear of composite veneering materials. J Mater Sci 37 (2002) 425-429
79. Lewis G. Predictors of clinical wear of restorative dental composite materials. Biomed Mater Eng 3 (1993) 167-174
80. Tyas M.J. Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in Class IV cavities. Aust Dent J 35 (1990) 46-49
81. Manhart J., Kunzelmann K.H., Chen H.Y., and Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16 (2000) 33-40
82. Milosevic A., and Dawson L.J. Salivary factors in vomiting bulimics with and without pathological tooth wear. Caries Res 30 (1996) 361-366
83. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 12 (1996) 218-226
84. Ferracane J.L., Choi K.K., and Condon J.R. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl (1999) S60-S66
85. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of seven commercial composites using new in vitro wear simulator. J Dent Res (2002) [Abstract Nr. 2683]
86. Materials ACoD. Obstacles to the development of a standard for posterior composite resins. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:649-51.
87. Lutz F., and Krejci I. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 185-190
88. Krejci I., and Lutz F. In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 (1990) 1445-1449
89. de Gee A.J., and Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 22 (1994) S21-S27
90. Bryant R.W. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dent Mater 6 (1990) 60-62
91. Perry R., Kugel G., Kunzelmann K.H., Flessa H.P., and Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 1472-1477
92. Christensen R., and Bangerter V. Apparatus for automated, non-contact measurements of surface changes. J Dent Res 69 (1990) 126 [Abstract 140]
93. DeLong R., Pintado M., and Douglas W.H. Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics. Dent Mater 1 (1985) 27-30
94. Roulet J.-F. Degradation of Dental Polymers (1987), Karger, Basel
95. Krejci I., Reich T., and Buchner W. F.L. Eine neue Methode zur dreidimensionalen Verschleissmessung. Schweiz Med Zahnmed 104 (1994) 147-157
96. Mehl A., Gloger W., Kunzelmann K.H., and Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1799-1807
97. CRA. Two-year clinical comparison of Renamel Hybrid to 5 popular Class 2 resins. CRA Newsletter 2000;24:1-2.
98. Wendt Jr. S.L., Ziemiecki T.L., and Leinfelder K.F. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 24 (1996) 33-39
99. Folwaczny M., Mehl A., Kunzelmann K.H., and Hickel R. Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device. Eur J Oral Sci 108 (2000) 233-238
100. Depew T.E., and Sörensen J.A. A pilot clinical study on the Artglass system. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 900 [Abstract No. 2150]
101. Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Vuylsteke M., and Davidson C.L. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: a new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 12 (1984) 252-267
102. Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vuylsteke-Wauters M., and Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 1752-1754
103. CRA. Posterior full crowns 2001. Part 3. 2-Year clinical performance of CAD-CAM copings & full crowns. CRA Newsletter 2001;25:1-3.
104. Willytec. Multifunctional chewing simulator-instructions of use 2001;1-39.
105. DeLong R., Sakaguchi R.L., Douglas W.H., and Pintado M.R. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1 (1985) 238-242
106. Sakaguchi R.L., Douglas W.H., DeLong R., and Pintado M.R. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 235-240
107. Lambrechts P., Vuylsteke M., Vanherle G., and Davidson C.L. Quantitative in vivo wear of posterior dental restorations: four-year results. J Dent Res 62 (1985) 370 [Abstract No. 1759]
108. Braem M., Lambrechts P., Van Doren V., and Vanherle G. In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 106-113
109. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen - Qualität. Potential und Indikationen (1992), Carl Hanser, München
110. De Gee A.J., Pallav P., and Davidson C.L. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 65 (1986) 654-658
111. Suzuki S., Kobashigawa A., and Leinfelder K.F. In vitro wear of direct and indirect nonhybrid composites. J Dent Res (2005) [Abstract Nr. 3089]
112. Suzuki S., and Leinfelder K.F. An in vitro evaluation of a copolymerizable type of microfilled composite resin. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 59-64
113. Suzuki S., Nagai E., Taira Y., and Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 431-436
114. Schultz S., Rosentritt M., Behr M., and Handel G. Mechanical properties and wear of restorative composites. J Dent Res (2003) [Abstract Nr. 381]
115. Schultz S., Rosentritt M., Behr M., and Handel G. Three-body wear of restorative composite materials. J Dent Res (2003) [Abstract Nr. 957]
116. Schultz S., Rosentritt M., Behr M., and Handel G. Mechanical properties of dental restoratives and their comparative flowables. J Dent Res (2005) [Abstract Nr. 1844]
117. de Gee A.J., Pallav P., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. Dent Mater 6 (1990) 266-270
118. Seghi R., Pollock M., and Lannutti J. Wear resistance of various nano-structured composites. J Dent Res (2002) [Abstract Nr. 3358]
119. Sorensen J.A., and Pham M. In vitro wear of composite resins processed with various systems. J Dent Res (2002) [Abstract Nr. 2578]
120. Gohring T.N., Besek M.J., and Schmidlin P.R. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent 30 (2002) 119-127
121. Schicht O., Göhring N.T., and Imfeld T. Marginal integrity and wear of new resin composites in vitro. J Dent Res (2005) [Abstract Nr. 279]
122. Krejci I., Lutz F., and Gautschi L. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 72 (1994) 233-244
123. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 53 (1995) 29-34
124. Kunzelmann K.H., Burkle V., and Bauer C. Two-body and three-body wear of glass ionomer cements. Int J Paediatr Dent 13 (2003) 434-440
125. Reich S.M., Petschelt A., Wichmann M., and Frankenberger R. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Biomed Mater Res A 69 (2004) 65-69
126. Pelka M., Ebert J., Schneider H., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 104 (1996) 132-137
127. Pallav P., de Gee A.J., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res 72 (1993) 56-61
128. Pallav P., Davidson C.L., and de Gee A.J. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 59 (1988) 426-429
129. de Gee A.J., Wendt S.L., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 17 (1996) 1327-1332
130. Say E.C., Civelek A., Nobecourt A., Ersoy M., and Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 628-634
131. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K., Peutzfeldt A., and van Dijken J.W. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci 110 (2002) 175-178
132. Frazier K.B., and Sarrett D.C. Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 161-164
133. Venhoven B.A., de Gee A.J., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Silane treatment of filler and composite blending in a one-step procedure for dental restoratives. Biomaterials 15 (1994) 1152-1156
134. Pallav P., De Gee A.J., Davidson C.L., Erickson R.L., and Glasspoole E.A. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 489-490
135. Graf K., Johnson G.H., Mehl A., and Rammelsberg P. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Oper Dent 27 (2002) 167-174
136. de Gee A.J., van Duinen R.N., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 75 (1996) 1613-1619
137. Frankenberger R., Garcia-Godoy F., Lohbauer U., Petschelt A., and Kramer N. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I. In vitro investigations. Am J Dent 18 (2005) 23-27
138. Krejci I., Lutz F., and Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 199-207
139. Krejci I., Lutz F., Reimer M., and Heinzmann J.L. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 69 (1993) 425-430
140. Suzuki S., and Leinfelder K.F. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 6 (1993) 199-203
141. Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., and Shinkai K. Wear resistance of resin cements. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 83-87
142. Suzuki S., Suzuki S.H., and Cox C.F. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 127 (1996) 74-80
143. Suzuki S. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 355-365
144. Imai Y., Suzuki S., and Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent 13 (2000) 315-323
145. Ramp M.H., Suzuki S., Cox C.F., Lacefield W.R., and Koth D.L. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 523-530
146. Ramp M.H., Ramp L.C., and Suzuki S. Vertical height loss: an investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel. J Prosthodont 8 (1999) 252-257
147. Shinkai K., Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., and Katoh Y. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 149-151
148. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont 13 (2004) 238-243
149. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent 17 (2004) 373-377
150. Shinkai K., Suzuki S., and Katoh Y. Effect of filler size on wear resistance of resin cement. Odontology 89 (2001) 41-44
151. Taira Y., Suzuki S., and Atsuta M. Wear of luting materials with titanium retainer. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 81-84
152. Young H.L., and Suzuki S. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Am J Dent 12 (1999) 47-50
153. Suzuki S., Cox C.F., Leinfelder K.F., Snuggs H.M., and Powell C.S. A new copolymerized composite resin system: a multiphased evaluation. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 15 (1995) 482-495
154. Suzuki S., and Leinfelder K.F. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 18 (1997) 1006-1008 1009-11
155. Shinkai K., Suzuki S., and Katoh Y. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 28 (1997) 687-693
156. Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., Kawai K., and Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 173-178
157. Shinkai K., Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., and Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 767-771
158. Matsumura H., Leinfelder K.F., and Kawai K. Three-body wear of light-activated composite veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 73 (1995) 233-239
159. Matsumura H., and Leinfelder K.F. Localized three-body wear of six types of composite resin veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 70 (1993) 207-213
160. DeLong R., Douglas W.H., Sakaguchi R.L., and Pintado M.R. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 214-219
161. Douglas W.H., Delong R., Pintado M.R., and Latta M.A. Wear rates of artificial denture teeth opposed by natural dentition. J Clin Dent 4 (1993) 43-47
162. Magne P., Oh W.S., Pintado M.R., and DeLong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent 82 (1999) 669-679
163. DeLong R., Pintado M.R., and Douglas W.H. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 42-48
164. Viazis A.D., DeLong R., Bevis R.R., Rudney J.D., and Pintado M.R. Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped 98 (1990) 103-109
165. DeLong R., Sasik C., Pintado M.R., and Douglas W.H. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater 5 (1989) 266-271
166. Coffey J.P., Goodkind R.J., DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 54 (1985) 273-280
167. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., and Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 4932-4937
168. Lim B.S., Ferracane J.L., Condon J.R., and Adey J.D. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 1-11
169. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1405-1411
170. Ferracane J.L., Mitchem J.C., Condon J.R., and Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1508-1516
171. Ferracane J.L., and Condon J.R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 262-267
172. Freiberg R.S., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent 11 (1998) 214-218
173. Braga R.R., Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 14 (2002) 368-376
174. Clelland N.L., Pagnotto M.P., Kerby R.E., and Seghi R.R. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 93 (2005) 153-157
175. Cha H.S., Lee Y.K., Lim B.S., Rhee S.H., and Yang H.C. Evaluation of wear resistance of dental resin composites with a 3D profilometer. J Biomed Mater Res B 71 (2004) 414-420
176. Clelland N.L., Agarwala V., Knobloch L.A., and Seghi R.R. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthodont 12 (2003) 168-175
177. Clelland N.L., Agarwala V., Knobloch L.A., and Seghi R.R. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prosthodont 10 (2001) 8-15
178. Heintze S.D., Cavalleri A., Zellweger G., and Ferracane J.L. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites in two different wear simulators. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 166-175
179. Kern M., Strub J.R., and Lu X.Y. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 372-378
180. Zantner C., Kielbassa A.M., Martus P., and Kunzelmann K.H. Wear of aluminum oxide antagonists by commercially available composites and compomers. Am J Dent 17 (2004) 285-290
181. Zantner C., Kielbassa A.M., Martus P., and Kunzelmann K.H. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 277-285