Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 264-270

  Takahashi, Hidekazu ^a   Finger, Werner J ^a   Endo, Tatsuo ^a   Kanehira, Masafumi ^a   Koottathape, Natthavoot ^a   Komatsu, Masashi ^a   Balkenhol, Markus ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EVALUATION; HARDNESS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; LINEAR MODELS; NANOCOMPOSITES; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84855390871     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes B. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382-1390. (Pubitemid 38019463)
2. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001;26:535-576. (Pubitemid 32496056)
3. Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int J Nanotechnol 2004; 1:130-156. (Pubitemid 40000680)
4. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 269-274. (Pubitemid 38738812)
5. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 2005;21: 641 -648.
6. Chen MH, Chen CR, HSU SH, Sun SP, Su WF. Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 138-145.
7. Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL, Rodrigues AL. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 2000; 13:136-138.
8. Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposite resin system. Part 1. The evaluation of contemporary composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004; 16:417-422.
9. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-560.
10. Kahler B, Kotousov A, Swain MV. On the design of dental resin-based composites: A micromechanical approach. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 165-172. (Pubitemid 350131555)
11. Soh MS, Sellinger A, Yap AU. Dental nanocomposites. Current Nanoscience 2006; 2: 373-381. (Pubitemid 44697125)
12. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nanostructered dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2006; 78:196-203.
13. de Moraes RR, Goncalves LS, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoretti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: Nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009; 34: 551 -557.
14. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21:9-20. (Pubitemid 40135726)
15. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003; 7: 63-70.
16. Van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11-year followup. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
17. Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 409-417. (Pubitemid 44276628)
18. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fineparticle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 119-125. (Pubitemid 44262731)
19. Loguercio AD, Lorini E, Weiss RV, Torn AP, Picinatto CC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A. A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in Class III restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9:57-64.
20. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater 2009; 25:1302-1314.
21. Van Dijken JWV, Lindberg A. Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: A five-year evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11:143-148.
22. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Richter G, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid Vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: Clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Dent Mater 2009;25:750-759.
23. International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials. ISO 4049:2009(E)
24. Lambrechts P, Ameye C, Vanherle G. Conventional and microfilled composite resins. Part II. Chip fractures. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 527-538.
25. Hie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13:427-438.
26. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 51-59. (Pubitemid 44880065)
27. Kim K-H, Ong J, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:642-649. (Pubitemid 40433926)
28. Li J, Li H, Fok A, Watts DC. Multiple correlations of material parameters of light-cured dental composites. Dent Mater 2009;25:829-836.
29. Kovarik RE, Fairhurst CW. Effect of Griffith precracks on measurement of composite fracture toughness. Dent Mater 1993; 9:222-228.
30. Fujishima A, Ferracane JL. Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites. Dent Mater 1996;12:38-43.
31. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
32. Wu W, Toth EE, Moffa JF, Ellison JA. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations. J Dent Res 1984;63:675-680.
33. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1140-1145.
34. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials. Quintessence lnt 2010;41 :e1 -e10.
35. Watanabe H, Khera SC, Vargas MA, Qian F. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24:418-425.
36. Spanoudakis Y, Young RJ. Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin. J Mater Sci 1984; 19:487-496.
37. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: Characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater 2009; 25:180-187.
38. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent Mater 2009;25:188-197.