Nanofilled and microhybrid composite restorations: Five-year clinical wear performances

Dental Materials

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 692-700

  Palaniappan, Senthamaraiselvi ^a   Bharadwaj, Dimple ^a   Mattar, Daniela Lima ^a   Peumans, Marleen ^a   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^a   Lambrechts, Paul ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Clinical performance; Clinical trial; Composite restorations; Microhybrid; Nanocomposites; Wear

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PERFORMANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; MICROHYBRID; WEAR;

BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; EPOXY RESINS; EXPERIMENTS; GYPSUM; NANOCOMPOSITES; RESINS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

RESTORATION;

FILTEK SUPREME; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PARTICLE SIZE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITES; PARTICLE SIZE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; YOUNG ADULT; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 79957689143     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. P.A. da Rosa Rodolpho, M.S. Cenci, T.A. Donassollo, A.D. Loguercio, and F.F. Demarco A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings J Dent 34 2006 427 435 (Pubitemid 44107613)
2. J.L. Ferracane Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 22 2006 689 692
3. S.D. Heintze, G. Zappini, and V. Rousson Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators: results of a round robin test Dent Mater 21 2005 304 317 (Pubitemid 40583938)
4. D. Cui, and H. Gao Advance and prospect of bionanomaterials Biotechnol Prog 19 2003 683 692 (Pubitemid 36715109)
5. Z.D. Yesil, S. Alapati, W. Johnston, and R.R. Seghi Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials J Prosthet Dent 99 2008 435 443
6. C.P. Turssi, J.L. Ferracane, and L.L. Ferracane Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 78 2006 196 203
7. S. Palaniappan, D. Bharadwaj, D. Mattar, M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, and P. Lambrechts Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite Dent Mater 25 2009 1302 1314
8. M.R. Pintado, G.C. Anderson, R. DeLong, and W.H. Douglas Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period J Prosthet Dent 77 1997 313 320
9. P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, M. Vuylsteke-Wauters, and G. Vanherle Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel J Dent Res 68 1989 1752 1754
10. S. Palaniappan, L. Elsen, I. Lijnen, M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, and P. Lambrechts Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations Clin Oral Investig 14 2009 441 458
11. J.A. Kaidonis, L.C. Richards, G.C. Townsen, and G.D. Tansley Wear of human enamel: a quantitative in vitro assessment J Dent Res 77 1998 1983 1990 (Pubitemid 32770498)
12. C.P. Turssi, J.J. Faraoni-Romano, M. de Menezes, and M.C. Serra Comparative study of the wear behavior of composites for posterior restorations J Mater Sci Mater Med 18 2007 143 147 (Pubitemid 46046727)
13. F. Lutz, I. Krejci, and F. Barbakow Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps J Dent Res 71 1992 1525 1529
14. F. Lobbezoo, and M. Naeije A reliability study of clinical tooth wear measurements J Prosthet Dent 86 2001 597 602 (Pubitemid 33608809)
15. K.J. Söderholm, P. Lambrechts, D. Sarrett, Y. Abe, M.C. Yang, and R. Labella Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods Eur J Oral Sci 109 2001 273 281 (Pubitemid 33774030)
16. M.J. Jaarda, R. Wang, and B.R. Lang A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composites wear J Prosthet Dent 77 1996 74 80
17. J.R. Condon, and J.L. Ferracane In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment J Dent Res 76 1997 1405 1411 (Pubitemid 127732224)
18. A. Mehl, W. Gloger, K.H. Kunzelmann, and R. Hickel A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear J Dent Res 76 1997 1799 1807 (Pubitemid 127732204)
19. S.D. Heintze How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods Dent Mater 22 2006 712 734 (Pubitemid 44026526)
20. M. Kern, J.R. Strub, and X.Y. Lu Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator J Oral Rehabil 26 1999 372 378
21. I. Krejci, and F. Lutz In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results [German] Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 1990 1445 1449
22. J.F. Roulet Development of appropriate measuring devices. Degradation of dental polymers 1987 Karger Basel p. 101-108
23. A.G. Glaros, and R. Waghela Psychophysiological definitions of clenching Cranio 24 2006 252 257 (Pubitemid 44625897)
24. K.F. Leinfelder, C.D. McCartha, and J.F. Wisniewski Posterior composite resin - a critical review J Am Dent Assoc 69 1985 19 24
25. D.B.M. Caldas, J.B. Almeida, L. Correr-Sobrinho, M.A.C. Sinhoreti, and S. Consani Influence of curing tip distance on resin composite Knoop hardness number, using three different light curing units Oper Dent 28 2003 315 320 (Pubitemid 37237459)
26. K. Ertl, A. Graf, D. Watts, and A. Schedle Stickiness of dental resin composite materials to steel, dentin and bonded dentin Dent Mater 26 2010 59 66
27. W.J. O'Brien, and J. Yee Microstructure of posterior restoration of resin composite after clinical wear Oper Dent 5 1980 90 94
28. M.C. Maas A scanning electron-microscopic study of in vitro abrasion of mammalian tooth enamel under compressive loads Arch Oral Biol 39 1994 1 11 (Pubitemid 124034452)
29. M. Braem, P. Lambrechts, and G. Vanherle Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies J Dent 22 1994 97 102
30. G.L.P. Willems, M. Braem, and G. Vanherle Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear J Dent 21 1993 74 78
31. W.W. Barkmeier, M.A. Latta, R.L. Erickson, and P. Lambrechts Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites Quintessence Int 35 2004 269 274 (Pubitemid 38365630)
32. J.J. Wendell, and W.F. Vann Wear of composite resin restorations in primary versus permanent molar teeth J Dent Res 67 1988 71 74
33. A. Peschke, S.D. Heintze, and J.F. Roulet Two-year clinical evaluation and wear analysis of posterior composite restorations J Dent Res 86 Spec Issue A 2007 Abstract No. 230
34. S. Palaniappan, L. Elsen, I. Lijnen, M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, and P. Lambrechts Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance Clin Oral Investig 2011 10.1007/s00784-010-0500-0