Two-body wear of dental restorative materials

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 237-244

  Hahnel, Sebastian ^a   Schultz, Sabine ^a   Trempler, Christina ^a   Ach, Bastian ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Composite; Filler content; Hardness; Ormocer; Silorane; Two body wear

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE; FILLER CONTENT; ORMOCER; SILORANES; TWO-BODY WEAR;

ENAMELS; FILLERS; HYBRID MATERIALS; MASTICATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VICKERS HARDNESS; WEAR RESISTANCE;

DENTAL COMPOSITES;

FILLER;

ARTICLE; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; HYBRID; IN VITRO STUDY; MASTICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; HARDNESS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYURETHANES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 79751536143     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bates J.F., Stafford G.D., Harrison A. Masticatory function-a review of the literature. 1. The form of the masticatory cycle. J. Oral Rehabil. 1975, 2:281-301.
2. Bartlett D., Sundaram G. An up to 3-year randomised clinical study comparing indirect and direct composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2006, 19:613-617.
3. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J., Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23:51-59.
4. Braem M., Lambrechts P., van Doren V., Vanherle G. In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent. Mater. 1986, 2:106-113.
5. Cha H.S., Lee Y.K., Lim B.S., Rhee S.H., Yang H.C. Evaluation of wear resistance of dental resin composites with a 3D profilometer. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 2004, 71B:414-420.
6. Christensen G.J. Remaining challenges with Class II resin-based composite restorations. J. Am. Dent. Ass. 2007, 138:1487-1489.
7. Condon J.R., Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent. Mater. 1996, 12:218-226.
8. Condon J.R., Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J. Dent. Res. 1997, 76:1405-1411.
9. Correr G.M., Bruschi Alonso R.C., Correr Sobrinho L., Puppin-Rontani R.M., Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of resin-based materials-simultaneous corrosive and abrasive wear. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 78:105-114.
10. DeGee A.J., Pallav P., Davidson C.L. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J. Dent. Res. 1986, 65:654-658.
11. Fagundes T.C., Barata T.J.E., Bresciani E., Cefaly D.F.G., Jorge M.F.F., Navarro M.F.L. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up. Clin. Oral Invest. 2006, 10:197-203.
12. Ferracane J.L., Mitchem J.C., Condon J.R., Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J. Dent. Res. 1997, 76:1508-1516.
13. Ghazal M., Yang B., Ludwig K., Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24:502-507.
14. Gibbs C.H., Mahan P.E., Lundeen H.C., Brehnan K., Walsh E.K., Holbrook W.B. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1981, 46:443-449.
15. Hahnel S., Behr M., Handel G., Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of denture resin teeth in dependence of antagonist material. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009, 101:259-278.
16. Heintze S.D., Zappini G., Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators - results of a round robin test. Dent. Mater. 2005, 21:304-317.
17. Heintze S.D. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:712-734.
18. Heintze S.D., Zellweger G., Zappini G. The relationship between physical parameters and wear of dental composites. Wear 2007, 263:1138-1146.
19. Hu X., Shortall A.C., Marquis P.M. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002, 29:756-764.
20. Jandt K.D., Sigusch B.W. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25:1001-1006.
21. Johansson A., Haraldson T., Omar R., Kiliaridis S., Carlsson G.E. An investigation of some factors associated with occlusal tooth wear in a selected high-wear sample. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1993, 101:407-415.
22. Johansson A., Kiliaridis S., Haraldson T., Omar R., Carlsson G.E. Covariation of some factors associated with occlusal tooth wear in a selected high-wear sample. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1993, 101:398-406.
23. Kakaboura A., Rahiotis C., Zinelis S., Al-Dhamadi Y.A., Silikas N., Watts D.C. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent. Mater. 2003, 19:393-398.
24. Kim S.K., Kim K.N., Chang I.T., Heo S.J. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001, 28:1048-1055.
25. Krejci I., Lutz F., Reimer M., Heinzmann J.L. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1993, 69:425-430.
26. Lambrechts P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:693-701.
27. Latta M.A., Barkmeier W.W., Wilwerding T.M., Blake S.M. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Am. J. Dent. 2001, 14:238-240.
28. Mair L.H., Stolarski T.A., Vowles R.W., Lloyd C.H. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a Workshop. J. Dent. 1996, 24:141-148.
29. Manhart J., Kunzelmann K.H., Chen H.Y., Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent. Mater. 2000, 16:33-40.
30. McCabe J.F., Wassell R.W. Hardness of model dental composites - the effect of filler volume fraction and silanation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1999, 10:291-294.
31. Moszner N., Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 2004, 1:130-156.
32. Palaniappan S., Bharadwaj D., Mattar D.L., Peumans M., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25:1302-1314.
33. Palaniappan S., Elsen L., Lijnen I., Peumans M., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P. Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations. Clin. Oral Invest. 2009, 10.1007/s00784-009-0313-1.
34. Pallesen U., Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays: an 11-year evaluation. Clin. Oral Invest. 2003, 7:71-79.
35. Rosentritt M., Behr M., Gebhard R., Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:176-182.
36. Shortall A.C., Hu X.Q., Marquis P.M. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent. Mater. 2002, 18:246-254.
37. Stober T., Lutz T., Gilde H., Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22:243-249.
38. Swift E.J., Ritter A.V., Heymann H.O., Sturdevant J.R., Wilder A.D. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in class I restorations. Am. J. Dent. 2008, 21:148-152.
39. Tagtekin D.A., Yanikoglu F.C., Bozkurt F.O., Kologlu B., Sur H. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20:487-497.
40. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4932-4937.
41. Turssi C.P., Ferracane J.L., Ferracane L.L. Wear and fatigue behaviour of nano-structured dental resing compsites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 78:196-203.
42. van Dijken J.W. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J. Dent. 2000, 28:299-306.
43. van Nieuwenhuysen J.P., D'Hoore W., Carvalho J., Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J. Dent. 2003, 31:395-405.
44. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., Walls A.W. A two-body frictional wear test. J. Dent. Res. 1994, 73:1546-1553.
45. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., Walls A.W.G. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent. Mater. 1994, 10:269-274.
46. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Lesaffre E., Braem M., Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: SEM study of differential wear. J. Dent. 1993, 21:79-86.
47. Yap A.U., Tan C.H., Chung S.M. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper. Dent. 2004, 29:269-274.
48. Yesil Z.D., Alapati S., Johnston W., Seghi R.R. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008, 99:435-443.