Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: A methodological investigation

Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 53-56

  Koottathape, Natthavoot ^a   Takahashi, Hidekazu ^a   Finger, Werner J ^b   Kanehira, Masafumi ^b   Iwasaki, Naohiko ^a   Aoyagi, Yujin ^c  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KANAGAWA DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ccdimaging; Composite resin; Profilometry; Wear

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; DENTAL MATERIAL; INORGANIC COMPOUND; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); RESIN; SILICON CARBIDE; SILICON DERIVATIVE; WATER; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DURAFILL; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PAPAVER; PLANT SEED; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME;

CARBON COMPOUNDS, INORGANIC; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY; PAPAVER; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SEEDS; SILICON COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84865089712     PISSN: 13428810     EISSN: 21859132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kahler B, Kotousov A, Swain MV. On the design of dental resin-based composites: A micromechanical approach. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 165-172.
2. Soh MS, Sellinger A, Yap AU. Dental nanocomposites. Current Nanoscience 2006; 2: 373-381.
3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite - State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
4. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2006; 78: 196-203.
5. Van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
6. Kramer N, Reinelt C, Richter G et al. Nanohybrid vs. fine particle composite in class II cavities: clinical results and marginal analysis after four years. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 750-759.
7. Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 2006; 22: 689-692.
8. Lambrechts P, Debels E, van Landuyt K et al. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 693-701.
9. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: Rethinking the current approaches: How to measure wear. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 702-711.
10. Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Koottathape N, Aoyagi Y. Umemoto K. Experimental wear test machine using oneaxis robots. J J Dent Equip 2011; 16: 34-35.