Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 435-443

  Yesil, Zeynep Duymus ^a   Alapati, Satish ^b   Johnston, William ^c   Seghi, Robert R ^c  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK SUPREME; HELIOMOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITE; POINT 4 COMPOSITE RESIN; POLYURETHAN; PREMISE COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ATTRITION;

EID: 44449111235     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60105-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Mjör I., Moorhead J., and Dahl J. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 57 (1999) 257-262
2. Anderson M. Current concepts of dental caries and its prevention. Oper Dent Suppl 6 (2001) 11-18
3. Suzuki S., Leinfelder K., Kawai K., and Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 8 (1995) 173-178
4. Mazer R., Leinfelder K., and Russel C. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 8 (1992) 185-189
5. Wendt S. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins: I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 18 (1987) 265-271
6. Ferracane J., Berge H., and Condon J. In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 42 (1998) 462-472
7. Watts D., and al Hindi A. Intrinsic 'soft-start' polymerization shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 39-45
8. Lim B., Ferracane J., Condon J., and Adey J. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 1-11
9. Condon J., and Ferracane J. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1405-1411
10. Mandikos M., McGivney G., Davis E., Bush P., and Carter J. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001) 386-395
11. Manhart J., Kunzelmann K., Chen H., and Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16 (2000) 33-40
12. Jørgensen K., and Asmussen E. Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine filler-an initial study. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 9 (1978) 73-78
13. Bayne S., Taylor D., and Heymann H. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 8 (1992) 305-309
14. Clelland N., Pagnotto M., Kerby R., and Seghi R. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 93 (2005) 153-157
15. Okomato A., Sekiya K., Fukushima M., Kota K., and Iwaku M. Direct observation of in vivo wear of composite resins. Dent Mater J 12 (1993) 54-61
16. Lutz F., Krejci I., and Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 1525-1529
17. Suzuki S., Suzuki S., and Cox C. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 127 (1996) 74-80
18. Pallav P., De Gee A., Davidson C., Erickson R., and Glasspoole E. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 489-490
19. Mair L. Wear in dentistry-current terminology. J Dent 20 (1992) 140-144
20. Mair L., Stolarski T., Vowles R., and Lloyd C. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 24 (1996) 141-148
21. Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vuylsteke-Wauters M., and Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 1752-1754
22. Pindborg J. Pathology of the dental hard tissues (1970), Munksgaard, Copenhagen 312-321
23. Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Vuylsteke M., and Davidson C. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: a new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 2 (1984) 252-267
24. Bayne S., Thompson J., and Taylor D. Biomaterials. In: Roberson T., Heymann H., and Swift E. (Eds). Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. (2006), Mosby, St. Louis 212
25. Söderholm K., and Richards N. Wear resistance of composites: a solved problem?. Gen Dent 46 (1998) 256-263
26. Jørgensen K., Hørsted P., Janum O., Krogh J., and Schulz J. Abrasion of class 1 restorative resins. Scand J Dent Res 87 (1979) 140-145
27. Heymann H., Wilder Jr. A., May Jr. K., and Leinfelder K. Two-year clinical study of composite resins in posterior teeth. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 37-41
28. Jagger D., and Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 22 (1995) 275-281
29. Clelland N., Villarroel S., Knobloch L., and Seghi R. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 830-837
30. Suzuki S., and Wood M. Mutual wear evaluation of resin composites when opposing enamel and dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81 (2007) 76-81
31. de Gee A., and Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 22 Suppl 1 (1994) S21-S27
32. Suzuki S., and Leinfelder K. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 4 (1993) 199-203
33. DeLong R., and Douglas W. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 32-36
34. Condon J., and Ferracane J. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 12 (1996) 218-226
35. Heintze S. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 712-734
36. Kirk-Othmer. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. 5th ed. Vol. 17 (2006), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken 44
37. Luo J., Lannutti J., and Seghi R. Effect of filler porosity on the abrasion resistance of nanoporous silica gel/polymer composites. Dent Mater 14 (1998) 29-36
38. Luo J., Lannutti J., and Seghi R. Phase transformation effects on the wear properties of alumina gel-polymer matrix nanocomposites. J Mater Res 16 (2001) 1680-1685
39. Luo J., Seghi R., and Lannutti J. Effect of silane coupling agents on the wear resistance of polymer-nanoporous silica gel dental composites. Mat Sci Eng C-Biomim 5 (1997) 15-22
40. Wu D, Holmes BN, Kolb BU, Mitra SB, Thompson WL, inventors. 3M Innovative Properites Co, assignee. Aesthetic dental materials. US patent 6 572 693. June 3, 2003.
41. Dresch W., Volpato S., Gomes J., Ribeiro N., Reis A., and Loguercio A. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 31 (2006) 409-417
42. Efes B., Dörter C., and Gömeç Y. Clinical evaluation of an ormocer, a nanofill composite and a hybrid composite at 2 years. Am J Dent 19 (2006) 236-240
43. Turssi C., Ferracane J., and Serra M. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 641-648