Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years

Dental Materials

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 455-464

  Krämer, Norbert ^a   García Godoy, Franklin ^b,c   Reinelt, Christian ^d   Feilzer, Albert J ^e   Frankenberger, Roland ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c FORSYTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Private Practice   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Etch and rinse; Marginal integrity; Nanofiller; Resin composites

Indexed keywords

CLASS II; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CLINICAL SERVICES; DROP-OUT; ETCH AND RINSE; FRIEDMAN TEST; HYBRID COMPOSITES; MANN-WHITNEY U-TEST; MARGINAL INTEGRITY; MARGINAL QUALITY; NANOFILLER; NANOHYBRIDS; OBSERVATION PERIOD; RESIN COMPOSITES; STEP FORMATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CRACKS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; ENAMELS; FILLING; RESINS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TOOTH ENAMEL;

RESTORATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GRANDIO; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SOLOBOND M; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TETRIC CERAM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETREATMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BICUSPID; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; RETREATMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953238187     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. J. Manhart, F. Garcia-Godoy, and R. Hickel Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments Dent Clin North Am 46 2002 303 339
2. R. Hickel, and J. Manhart Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure J Adhes Dent 3 2001 45 64 (Pubitemid 33771945)
3. I.A. Mjor The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice Acta Odontol Scand 55 1997 58 63 (Pubitemid 127509201)
4. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Peumans, M. Verschueren, S. Gladys, M. Braem, and P. Lambrechts Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems J Dent Res 73 1994 1690 1702
5. G. Bergenholtz Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11 2000 467 480 (Pubitemid 32003257)
6. J. Manhart, H. Chen, G. Hamm, and R. Hickel Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition Oper Dent 29 2004 481 508 (Pubitemid 39278667)
7. J. Manhart, H.Y. Chen, and R. Hickel Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities Clin Oral Investig 13 2009 301 307
8. M. Peumans, P. Kanumilli, J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials Dent Mater 21 2005 864 881 (Pubitemid 41108347)
9. F.R. Tay, R. Frankenberger, I. Krejci, S. Bouillaguet, D.H. Pashley, and R.M. Carvalho Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence J Dent 32 2004 611 621 (Pubitemid 39346055)
10. L.N. Baratieri, and A.V. Ritter Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique J Esthet Restor Dent 13 2001 50 57
11. B.G. Efes, C. Dorter, Y. Gomec, and F. Koray Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner J Adhes Dent 8 2006 119 126 (Pubitemid 43652298)
12. C.P. Ernst, M. Brandenbusch, G. Meyer, K. Canbek, F. Gottschalk, and B. Willershausen Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite Clin Oral Investig 10 2006 119 125 (Pubitemid 44262731)
13. A.J. Feilzer, A.J. de Gee, and C.L. Davidson Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration J Dent Res 66 1987 1636 1639
14. J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, M. Peumans, A. Poitevin, P. Lambrechts, and M. Braem A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results J Dent Res 84 2005 118 132 (Pubitemid 43822043)
15. N. Kramer, F. Garcia-Godoy, and R. Frankenberger Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II. In vivo investigations Am J Dent 18 2005 75 81 (Pubitemid 40934171)
16. N. Kramer, M. Taschner, U. Lohbauer, A. Petschelt, and R. Frankenberger Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years J Adhes Dent 10 2008 307 314
17. R. Frankenberger, J. Perdigao, B.T. Rosa, and M. Lopes "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives - a microtensile bond strength and morphological study Dent Mater 17 2001 373 380 (Pubitemid 33651208)
18. S.A. Nikolaenko, U. Lohbauer, M. Roggendorf, A. Petschelt, W. Dasch, and R. Frankenberger Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin Dent Mater 20 2004 579 585
19. B. Van Meerbeek, J. Perdigao, P. Lambrechts, and G. Vanherle The clinical performance of adhesives J Dent 26 1998 1 20 (Pubitemid 128394259)
20. B. Van Meerbeek, J. De Munck, Y. Yoshida, S. Inoue, M. Vargas, and P. Vijay Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges Oper Dent 28 2003 215 235 (Pubitemid 37237447)
21. J.P. Van Nieuwenhuysen, W. D'Hoore, J. Carvalho, and V. Qvist Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth J Dent 31 2003 395 405 (Pubitemid 36870889)
22. B. Van Meerbeek, P. Kanumilli, J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, and M. Peumans A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel Dent Mater 21 2005 375 383 (Pubitemid 40583946)
23. J. De Munck, B. Van Meerbeek, Y. Yoshida, S. Inoue, K. Suzuki, and P. Lambrechts Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin J Dent Res 82 2003 136 140 (Pubitemid 41764126)
24. R. Frankenberger, and F.R. Tay Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations Dent Mater 21 2005 397 412 (Pubitemid 40467029)
25. R. Frankenberger, N. Kramer, U. Lohbauer, S.A. Nikolaenko, and S.M. Reich Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 9 Suppl. 1 2007 107 116
26. D. Dietschi, S.G. De, L. Neveu-Rosenstand, and J. Holz Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation Quintessence Int 26 1995 717 727
27. R. Frankenberger, W.O. Strobel, N. Krämer, U. Lohbauer, J. Winterscheidt, and B. Winterscheidt Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentin bond with the use of different methods J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 67 2003 712 721 (Pubitemid 37521379)
28. R. Frankenberger, W.O. Strobel, U. Lohbauer, N. Kramer, and A. Petschelt The effect of six years of water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 69 2004 25 32 (Pubitemid 38391995)
29. R. Frankenberger, N. Kramer, and A. Petschelt Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation Oper Dent 25 2000 324 330
30. W. Dresch, S. Volpato, J.C. Gomes, N.R. Ribeiro, A. Reis, and A.D. Loguercio Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results Oper Dent 31 2006 409 417 (Pubitemid 44276628)
31. R. Hickel, J.F. Roulet, S. Bayne, S.D. Heintze, I.A. Mjör, and M. Peters Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials Science Committee Project 2/98 - FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns J Adhes Dent 9 Suppl. 1 2007 121 147
32. P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, and G. Vanherle Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives Oper Dent 12 1987 53 78
33. U. Lohbauer, R. Frankenberger, N. Kramer, and A. Petschelt Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 76 2006 114 120 (Pubitemid 43062751)
34. N.L. Clelland, M.P. Pagnotto, R.E. Kerby, and R.R. Seghi Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite J Prosthet Dent 93 2005 153 157 (Pubitemid 40170085)
35. J.I. Schwartz, and K.J. Söderholm Effects of filler size, water, and alcohol on hardness and laboratory wear of dental composites Acta Odontol Scand 62 2004 102 106 (Pubitemid 38647740)
36. C.P. Turssi, P.B. De Moraes, and M.C. Serra Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods - a review J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 65 2003 280 285 (Pubitemid 37521259)
37. J.L. Ferracane, and J.R. Condon In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading Dent Mater 15 1999 262 267 (Pubitemid 129589460)
38. S. Palaniappan, L. Elsen, I. Lijnen, M. Peumans, M.B. Van, and P. Lambrechts Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations Clin Oral Investig 14 2010 441 458
39. S. Palaniappan, D. Bharadwaj, D.L. Mattar, M. Peumans, M.B. Van, and P. Lambrechts Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite Dent Mater 25 2009 1302 1314
40. I. Needleman, H. Worthington, D. Moher, K. Schulz, and D.G. Altman Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement Am J Dent 21 2008 7 12
41. A.I. Abdalla, and C.L. Davidson Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations J Dent 21 1993 158 162
42. N. Kramer, F. Garcia-Godoy, C. Reinelt, and R. Frankenberger Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years Am J Dent 19 2006 61 66 (Pubitemid 43503251)
43. R. Frankenberger, F. Garcia-Godoy, U. Lohbauer, A. Petschelt, and N. Kramer Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I. In vitro investigations Am J Dent 18 2005 23 27 (Pubitemid 40934189)
44. N. Attar The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials J Contemp Dent Pract 8 2007 27 35
45. M. Jung, K. Sehr, and J. Klimek Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing Oper Dent 32 2007 45 52