Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 125-137

  Frankenberger, Roland ^a   Reinelt, Christian ^b   Krämer, Norbert ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^b University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg Campus Giessen ^*

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Etch and rinse; Extended lesions; Marginal integrity; Nanofillers; Resin composites

Indexed keywords

NANOCOMPOSITE;

ADULT; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891559298     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0957-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R (2002) Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 46: 303-339.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3: 45-64.
3. Mjor IA (1997) The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 55: 58-63.
4. van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1994) Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73: 1690-1702.
5. Bergenholtz G (2000) Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11: 467-480.
6. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29: 481-508.
7. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R (2009) Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities. Clin Oral Investig 13: 301-307.
8. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21: 864-881.
9. Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Lai CNS (2004) Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I In vivo evidence J Dent 32: 611-621.
10. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV (2001) Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 13: 50-57.
11. Efes BG, Dorter C, Gomec Y, Koray F (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. J Adhes Dent 8: 119-126.
12. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B (2006) Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 10: 119-125.
13. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66: 1636-1639.
14. De Munck J, van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84: 118-132.
15. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2005) Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. Am J Dent 18: 75-81.
16. Krämer N, Taschner M, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2008) Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. J Adhes Dent 10: 307-314.
17. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M (2001) "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17: 373-380.
18. Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R (2004) Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 20: 579-585.
19. van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1998) The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26: 1-20.
20. van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28: 215-235.
21. van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V (2003) Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 31: 395-405.
22. van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M (2005) A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 21: 375-383.
23. De Munck J, van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P (2003) Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 82: 136-140.
24. Frankenberger R, Tay FR (2005) Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 21: 397-412.
25. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM (2007) Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 1): 107-116.
26. Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L, Holz J (1995) Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 26: 717-727.
27. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, Petschelt A (2003) Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentin bond with the use of different methods. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 67: 712-721.
28. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A (2004) The effect of six years of water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 69: 25-32.
29. Kuper NK, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC (2012) The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries. J Dent 40: 241-247.
30. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A (2000) Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25: 324-330.
31. Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2006) Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 31: 409-417.
32. Hickel R et al (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent 9(Suppl 1): 121-147.
33. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC (2010) 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 89: 1063-1067.
34. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G (1987) Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 12: 53-78.
35. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A (2006) Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76: 114-120.
36. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR (2005) Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 93: 153-157.
37. Schwartz JI, Söderholm KJ (2004) Effects of filler size, water, and alcohol on hardness and laboratory wear of dental composites. Acta Odontol Scand 62: 102-106.
38. Turssi CP, De Moraes PB, Serra MC (2003) Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods-a review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 65: 280-285.
39. Ferracane JL, Condon JR (1999) In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 15: 262-267.
40. Schmidt M, Kirkevang LL, Hörstedt-Bindslev P, Poulsen S (2011) Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite-1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 15: 219-225.
41. Baracco B, Perdigao J, Cabrera E, Giraldez I, Ceballos L (2012) Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results. Oper Dent 37: 117-129.
42. Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P (2010) Three-year randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 14: 441-458.
43. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P (2009) Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater 25: 1302-1314.
44. Needleman I, Worthington H, Moher D, Schulz K, Altman DG (2008) Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement. Am J Dent 21: 7-12.
45. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R (2006) Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Am J Dent 19: 61-66.
46. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL (1993) Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro class II composite restorations. J Dent 21: 158-162.
47. Attar N (2007) The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8: 27-35.
48. Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J (2007) Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 32: 45-52.
49. Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2005) Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations. Am J Dent 18: 23-27.