How to simulate wear?. Overview of existing methods

Dental Materials

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 693-701

  Lambrechts, Paul ^a   Debels, Elke ^a   Van Landuyt, Kirsten ^a   Peumans, Marleen ^a   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dental materials; In vitro; Wear; Wear simulation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTISTRY; EXTRAPOLATION; SIMULATORS; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

BIOLOGICAL WEAR PROCESS; CONTROLLABLE VARIABLES; SIMULATING DEVICES;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTHBRUSHING;

EID: 33745685639     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Mair L.H. Wear in the mouth: the tribological dimension. In: Addy, et al. (Ed). Tooth wear and sensitivity. Clinical advances in restorative dentistry (2000), Martin Dunitz Ltd.
2. Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vuysteke-Wauters M., and Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 1752-1754
3. Pallav P., de Gee A.J., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res 72 1 (1993) 56-61
4. Wu W., and Cobb E.N. A silver staining technique for investigating wear of restorative dental composites. Biomed Mater Res 15 (1981) 343-348
5. Wu W., Toth E.E., Moffa J.F., and Ellison J.A. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations. J Dent Res 63 5 (1984) 675-680
6. Mair L. Staining of in vivo subsurface degradation in composite resins with silver nitrate. J Dent Res 70 (1991) 215-220
7. Schmidlin P.R., Pasqualetti T., Imfeld T., and Besek M. An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 113 4 (2003) 427-438
8. Wendt Jr. S.L., Ziemiecki T.L., and Leinfelder K.F. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 24 (1996) 33-39
9. Ehrnford L. Surface microstructure of composite resins after toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. Acta Odontol Scand 41 4 (1983) 241-245
10. Momoi Y., Hirosaki K., Kohno A., and McCabe J.F. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater 13 2 (1997) 82-88
11. Tanoue N., Matsumura H., and Atsuta M. Analysis of composite type (Artglass) and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance. J Dent. 28 5 (2000) 355-359
12. Eisenburger M., Shellis R.P., and Addy M. Comparative study of wear of enamel induced by alternating and simultaneous combinations of abrasion and erosion in vitro. Caries Res 37 6 (2003) 450-455
13. Takeuchi C.Y., Orbegoso Flores V.H., Palma Dibb R.G., Panzeri H., Lara E.H., and Dinelli W. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing. Oper Dent 28 3 (2003) 281-286
14. Remizov S.M., and Pruzhanskii L.I.U. The effect of toothbrushes on human dental enamel and dentin wear. Stomatologiia (Mosk) 4 (1990) 4-6
15. McLey L., Boyd R.L., and Sarker S. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: relative degree of bristle end-rounding. J Clin Dent 8 3 (1997) 86-90
16. Rawls H.R., Casella R., and Mkwayi-Tulloch N.J. An in vitro and in vivo study of toothbrush bristle splaying. J Dent Res 72 5 (1993) 947-952
17. Nordbo H., and Skogedal O. The rate of cervical abrasion in dental students. Acta Odontol Scand 40 (1982) 45-47
18. Joiner A., Pickles M.J., Tanner C., Weader E., and Doyle P. An in situ model to study the toothpaste abrasion of enamel. J Clin Periodontol 31 6 (2004) 434-438
19. Saxton C.A., and Cowell C.R. Clinical investigation of the effects of dentifrices on dentin wear at the cementoenamel junction. J Am Dent Assoc 102 1 (1981) 38-43
20. McCabe J.F., and Smith B.H. A method for measuring the wear of restorative materials in vitro. Br Dent J 151 4 (1981) 123-126
21. Fan P.L., Powers J.M., and Craig R.G. In vitro wear of microfilled and visible light-cured composites. J Dent Res 58 11 (1979 Nov) 2116-2119
22. Hu X., Marquis P.M., and Shortall A.C. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. J Prosthet Dent 82 2 (1999) 214-220
23. Hu X., Harrington E., Marquis P.M., and Shortall A.C. The influence of cyclic loading on the wear of a dental composite. Biomaterials 20 10 (1999) 907-912
24. Winkler M.M., Greener E.H., and Lautenschlager E.P. Non-linear in vitro wear of posterior composites with time. Dent Mater 7 4 (1991) 258-262
25. Harrison A., and Draughn R.A. Abrasive wear, tensile strength, and hardness of dental composite resins-is there a relationship?. J Prosthet Dent 36 4 (1976) 395-398
26. Draughn R.A., and Harrison A. Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 40 2 (1978) 220-224
27. Rice S.L., Bailey W.F., Wayne S.F., and Burns J.A. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives. J Dent Res 63 9 (1984) 1173-1175
28. Smalley W.M., and Nicholls J.I. In vitro two-body wear of polymeric veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 56 2 (1986) 175-181
29. Burgoyne A.R., Nicholls J.I., and Brudvik J.S. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 65 2 (1991) 206-214
30. Jagger D.C., and Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 22 4 (1995) 275-281
31. Jagger D.C., and Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 22 5 (1995) 349-354
32. Nagarajan V.S., Jahanmir S., and Thompson V.P. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater 20 1 (2004) 63-71
33. Kula K., McKinney J.E., and Kula T.J. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin composite degradation and wear. Dent Mater 13 5 (1997) 305-311
34. Lappalainen R., Yli-Urpo A., and Seppa L. Wear of dental restorative and prosthetic materials in vitro. Dent Mater 5 1 (1989) 35-37
35. Pilliar R.M., Smith D.C., and Maric B. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites. J Dent Res 63 9 (1984) 1166-1172
36. Seghi R.R., Rosenstiel S.F., and Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 70 3 (1991) 221-225
37. Willems G., Celis J.P., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Roos J.R., and Vanherle G. In vitro vibrational wear under small displacements of dental materials opposed to annealed chromium-steel counterbodies. Dent Mater 8 6 (1992) 338-344
38. de Gee A.J., Pallav P., and Davidson C.L. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 65 5 (1986) 654-658
39. Pallav P., Davidson C.L., and de Gee A.J. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 59 4 (1988) 426-429
40. Pallav P., de Gee A.J., Davidson C.L., Erickson R.L., and Glasspoole E.A. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res 68 3 (1989) 489-490
41. de Gee A.J., Wendt S.L., Werner A., and Davidson C.L. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 17 13 (1996) 1327-1332
42. Graf K., Johnson G.H., Mehl A., and Rammelsberg P. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Oper Dent 27 2 (2002) 167-174
43. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K., Peutzfeldt A., and van Dijken J.W. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci 110 2 (2002) 175-178
44. Reich S.M., Petschelt A., Wichmann M., and Frankenberger R. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Biomed Mater Res A 69 1 (2004) 65-69
45. Pallav P. Occlusal wear in dentistry. Fundamental mechanisms, clinical implications and laboratory assessment. Doctoral Thesis. Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam; 1996.
46. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 12 4 (1996) 218-226
47. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 38 4 (1997) 303-313
48. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 76 7 (1997) 1405-1411
49. Freiberg R.S., and Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent 11 5 (1998) 214-218
50. Ferracane J.L., and Condon J.R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 15 4 (1999) 262-267
51. Braga R.R., Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 14 6 (2002) 368-376
52. Ferracane J.L., Choi K.K., and Condon J.R. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 25 (1999) S60
53. Clelland N.L., Villarroel S.C., Knobloch L.A., and Seghi R.R. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Aust Dent J 48 1 (2003) 15-19
54. Clelland N.L., Pagnotto M.P., Kerby R.E., and Seghi R.R. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 93 2 (2005) 153-157
55. Leinfelder K.F., Beaudreau R.W., and Mazer R.B. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int 20 10 (1989) 755-761
56. Leinfelder K.F., and Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc 130 9 (1999) 1347-1353
57. Suzuki S., and Leinfelder K.F. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 6 4 (1993) 199-203
58. Matsumura H., and Leinfelder K.F. Localized three-body wear of six types of composite resin veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 70 3 (1993) 207-213
59. Matsumura H., and Leinfelder K.F. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Quintessence Int 25 6 (1994) 425-430
60. Suzuki S., Leinfelder K.F., Kawai K., and Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 8 4 (1995) 173-178
61. Kawai K., and Leinfelder K.F. In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. Dent Mater 11 4 (1995) 246-251
62. Ramp M.H., Ramp L.C., and Suzuki S. Vertical height loss: an investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel. J Prosthodont 8 4 (1999) 252-257
63. Latta M.A., Barkmeier W.W., Wilwerding T.M., and Blake S.M. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Am J Dent 14 4 (2001) 238-240
64. St-Georges A.J., Swift Jr. E.J., Thompson J.Y., and Heymann H.O. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites. Oper Dent 27 4 (2002) 410-417
65. Suzuki S., Nagai E., Taira Y., and Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 88 4 (2002) 431-436
66. Imai Y., Suzuki S., and Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent 13 6 (2000) 315-323
67. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent 17 5 (2004) 373-377
68. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont 13 4 (2004) 238-243
69. Krejci I., Reich T., Lutz F., and Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 8 (1990) 953-960
70. Krejci I., Albertoni M., and Lutz F. An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 10 (1990) 1164-1168
71. Krejci I., Heinzmann J.L., and Lutz F. The wear on enamel, amalgam and their enamel antagonists in a computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 11 (1990) 1285-1291
72. Krejci I., and Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100 12 (1990) 1445-1449
73. Krejci I., Lutz F., and Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res 71 7 (1992) 1413-1416
74. Lutz F., Krejci I., and Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 71 8 (1992) 1525-1529
75. Krejci I., Albert P., and Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 78 2 (1999) 713-719
76. Lutz F., and Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis. J Esthet Dent 12 3 (2000) 146-159
77. Gohring T.N., Besek M.J., and Schmidlin P.R. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent 30 2/3 (2002) 119-127
78. Gohring T.N., Schonenberger K.A., and Lutz F. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent 16 4 (2003) 275-282
79. Yap A.U., Ong L.F., Teoh S.H., and Hastings G.W. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. J Oral Rehabil 26 3 (1999) 228-235
80. Yap A.U., Tan C.H., and Chung S.M. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 29 3 (2004) 269-274
81. Sakaguchi R.L., Douglas W.H., DeLong R., and Pintado M.R. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 235-240
82. Kunzelmann K.H., Jelen B., Mehl A., and Hickel R. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 4 (2001) 171-184
83. Shortall A.C., Hu X.Q., and Marquis P.M. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater 18 3 (2002) 246-254
84. Kaidonis J.A., Richards L.C., Townsend G.C., and Tansley G.D. Wear of human enamel: a quantitative in vitro assessment. J Dent Res 77 12 (1998) 1983-1990
85. Satou N., Khan A.M., Satou K., Satou J., Shintani H., Wakasa K., et al. In-vitro and in-vivo wear profile of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 19 1 (1992) 31-37
86. Nomoto R., Komoriyama M., McCabe J.F., and Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 972-978
87. Sarrett D.C., Soderholm K.J., and Batich C.D. Water and abrasive effects on three-body wear of composites. J Dent Res 70 7 (1991) 1074-1081
88. Eisenburger M., and Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro. Part I. Interaction effects. J Dent 30 7/8 (2002) 341-347
89. Eisenburger M., and Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro. Part II. Influence of time and loading. J Dent 30 7/8 (2002) 349-352
90. Shabanian M., and Richards L.C. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. J Prosthet Dent 87 6 (2002) 650-656
91. Eccles J.D. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent Update 9 (1982) 373-381
92. Jagger D.C., and Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 22 4 (1995) 275-281
93. Kawai K., Isenberg B.P., and Leinfelder K.F. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 25 1 (1994) 53-58
94. Guzman A.F., Moore B.K., and Andres C.J. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Int J Prosthodont 10 5 (1997) 415-425
95. Maas M.C. Enamel structure and microwear: an experimental study of the response of enamel to shearing force. Am J Phys Anthropol 85 1 (1991) 31-49
96. Elfick A.P., Green S.M., Pinder I.M., and Unsworth A. A novel technique for the detailed size characterization of wear debris. J Mater Sci Mater Med 11 5 (2000) 267-271
97. Savio III J.A., Overcamp L.M., and Black J. Size and shape of biomaterial wear debris. Clin Mater 15 2 (1994) 101-147