Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 397-403

  Liang, Shide ^a,b,c   Meroueh, Samy O ^b   Wang, Guangce ^c   Qiu, Chao ^c   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF OCEANOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Conservation score; Energy score; Interface propensity; Near native decoy selection; Protein docking

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPIRICAL NEAR NATIVE DOCKING DECOY ENRICHMENT SCORE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

RUMEX;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 66149142757     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22252     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mendez R, Laplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of capri predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
2. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:183-193.
3. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007;69:704-718.
4. Aloy P, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJ. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J Mol Biol 2001;311: 395-408.
5. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique and clusterization guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005;60:314-318.
6. deVries SJ, vanDijk AD, Bonvin AM. Whiscy: what information does surface conservation yield? application to data-driven docking. Proteins 2006;63:479-489.
7. Jones S, Thornton JM. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol 1997;272:133-143.
8. Zhou H-X, Shan Y. Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins 2001;44:336-343.
9. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2004;338:181-199.
10. Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Protein binding site prediction with an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34: 3698-3707.
11. Zhou H-X, Qin S. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2203-2209.
12. Gottschalk KE, Neuvirth H, Schreiber G. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites. Protein Eng Des Sel 2004;17:183-189.
13. Duan Y, Reddy BV, Kaznessis YN. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions. Protein Sci 2005;14:316-328.
14. Heusear P, Bau D, Benkert P, Schomburg D. Refinement of unbound protein docking studies using biological knowledge. Proteins 2005;61:1059-1067.
15. Tress M, deJuan D, Grana O, Gomez MJ, Gomez-Puertas P, Gonzalez JM, Lopez G, Valencia A. Scoring docking models with evolutionary information. Proteins 2005;60:275-280.
16. Chelliah V, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J. Efficient restraints for protein-protein docking by comparison of observed amino acid substitution patterns with those predicted from local environment. J Mol Biol 2006;357:1669-1682.
17. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
18. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
19. Henikoff S, Henikoff J. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:10915-10919.
20. Liang S, Zhang J, Zhang S, Guo H. Prediction of the interaction site on the surface of an isolated protein structure by analysis of side chain energy scores. Proteins 2004;57:548-557.
21. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
22. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005;60:214-216.
23. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
24. Gray J, Moughan S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl C, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid body displacement and side chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
25. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007;69:511-520.
26. Liang S, Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou Y. A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys. Proteins 2007;69:244-253.
27. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK:reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007;67:1078-1086.