Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 2608-2614

  Brenke, Ryan ^a   Hall, David R ^a   Chuang, Gwo Yu ^a   Comeau, Stephen R ^a   Bohnuud, Tanggis ^a   Beglov, Dmitri ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^b   Vajda, Sandor ^a   Kozakov, Dima ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; IMMUNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN BINDING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY COMPLEX; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOURIER ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84870440262     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts493     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chen, R. et al. (2003) ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins., 52, 80-87.
2. Chuang, G. et al (2008) DARS (Decoys as the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking. Biophys. J., 95, 4217-4227.
3. Clark, L.A. et al. (2006) Trends in antibody sequence changes during the somatic hypermutation process. J. Immunol., Ill, 333-340.
4. Comeau, S.R. et al. (2004) ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics, 20, 45-50.
5. Comeau, S.R. et al. (2007) ClusPro: performance in CAPRI rounds 6-11 and the new server. Proteins, 69, 781-785.
6. Glaser, F. et al. (2001) Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins, 43, 89-102.
7. Gray, J.J. et al. (2003) Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol., 331, 281-299.
8. Halperin, I. et al. (2002) Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins, 47, 409-443.
9. Hwang, H. et al. (2008) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins, 73, 705-709.
10. Kozakov, D. et al. (2005) Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys. J., 89, 867-875.
11. Kozakov, D. et al. (2006) PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins, 65, 392-406.
12. Kozakov, D. et al. (2008) Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima. Proteins, 72, 993-1004.
13. Kozakov, D. et al. (2010) Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: cluspro, piper, sdu, and stability analysis in capri rounds 13-19. Proteins, 78, 3124-3130.
14. Lensink, M.F. and Wodak, SJ. (2010) Docking and scoring protein interactions: capri 2009. Proteins, 78, 3073-3084.
15. Lo Conte, L. et al. (1999) The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol, 285, 2177-2198.
16. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. (2001) A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins, 44, 223-232.
17. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R (1985) Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules, 18, 534-552.
18. Ponomarenko, J.V. and Bourne, P.E. (2007) Antibody-protein interactions: benchmark datasets and prediction tools evaluation. BMC Struct. Biol, 1, 64.
19. Ravikant, D.V.S. and Elber, R (2010) Pie-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking. Proteins, 78, 400-419.
20. Rojnuckarin, A. and Subramaniam, S. (1999) Knowledge-based interaction potentials for proteins. Proteins, 36, 54-67.
21. Sippl, MJ. (1993) Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comput. Aided Mol Des., 1, 473-501.
22. Sircar, A. and Gray, J.J. (2010) Snugdock: paratope structural optimization during antibody-antigen docking compensates for errors in antibody homology models. PLoS Comput. Biol, 6, el000644.
23. Skolnick, J. et al (l 997) Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding, when is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sei., 6, 1-13.
24. Vajda, S. (2005) Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Proteins, 60, 176-180.
25. Zhang, C. et al (1997) Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J. Mol Biol, 267, 707-726.