ClusPro: Performance in CAPRI rounds 6-11 and the new server

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 781-785

  Comeau, Stephen R ^a   Kozakov, Dima ^b   Brenke, Ryan ^b,c   Shen, Yang ^b,c   Beglov, Dmitri ^b   Vajda, Sandor ^b  

^a Dyax Corp   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination by clustering; Docking server; Fast fourier transform correlation method; Protein docking; Web based computing

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLATION FACTOR 1; ARF BINDING PROTEIN; BINDING PROTEIN; DOCKING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE ACTIVATING PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN ARHGAP10; PROTEIN TOLB; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIMERIZATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENOMICS; INTERNET; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 36749031065     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21795     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem A, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition - determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;9:2195-2199.
2. Vakser IA. Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. Biopolymers 1996;39:455-464.
3. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 2001;14:105-113.
4. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
5. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.
6. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
7. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJE. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285.
8. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid body docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
9. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJE. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
10. Camacho CJ, Gatchell D. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
11. Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys J 2005;89:867-875.
12. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
13. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
14. Comeau SR, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Performance of the first protein docking server ClusPro in CAPRI Rounds 3-5. Proteins 2005;60:239-244.
15. Zhang C, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
16. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406.
17. Graille M, Heurgue-Hamard V, Champ S, Mora L, Scrima N, Ulryck N, van Tilbeurgh H, Buckingham RH. Molecular basis for bacterial class I release factor methylation by PrmC. Mol Cell 2005;20:917-927.
18. Prasad JC, Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Consensus alignment server for reliable comparative modeling with distant templates. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W50-W54.
19. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart A, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
20. Hou Z, Bernstein DA, Fox CA, Keck JL. Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:8489-8494.
21. Nielsen TK, Liu S, Luhrmann R, Ficner R. Structural basis for the bifunctionality of the U5 snRNP 52K protein (CD2BP2). J Mol Biol 2007;369:902-908.
22. Ghosh A, Praefcke GJ, Renault L, Wittinghofer A, Herrmann C. How guanylate-binding proteins achieve assembly-stimulated processive cleavage of GTP to GMP. Nature 2006;440:101-104.
23. Comeau SR, Camacho CJ. Predicting oligomeric assemblies: N-mers as a primer. J Struct Biol 2005;150:233-244.
24. Ménétrey J, Perderiset M, Cicolari J, Dubois T, Elkhatib N, El Khadali F, Franco M, Chavrier P, Houdusse A. Structural basis for ARF1-mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes. EMBO J 2007;26:1953-1962.
25. Bonsor DA, Grishkovskaya I, Dodson EJ, Kleanthous C. Molecular mimicry enables competitive recruitment by a natively disordered protein. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:4800-4807.
26. Walker JR, Awakumov GV, Xue S, Newman EM, Mackenzie F, Weigelt J, Sundstrom M, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Bochkarev A, Dhe-Paganon S. A novel and unexpected complex between the SUMO-1-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and the Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25 kDa, to be published.