Decoys 'R' Us: A database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction

Protein Science

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1399-1401

  Samudrala, Ram ^a   Levitt, Michael ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Refinement; Scoring energy functions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA BASE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033853177     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.9.7.1399     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Holm L, Sander C. 1992. Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J Mol Biol 225:93-105.
2. Huang E, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M. 1996. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 257:716-725.
3. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. 1999. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 288:477-487.
4. Novotny J, Bruccoleri R, Karplus M. 1984. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. J Mol Biol 177:787-818.
5. Park B, Huang E, Levitt M. 1997. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 266:831-846.
6. Park B, Levitt M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 258:367-392.
7. Samudrala R, Moult J. 1998. An all-atom distance dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 275:895-916.
8. Samudrala R, Xia Y, Huang E, Levitt M. 1999. Ah initio protein structure prediction using a combined hierarchical approach. Proteins Struct Funct Genet S3:194-198.
9. Samudrala R, Xia Y, Levitt M, Cotton N, Huang E, Davis R. 2000. Probing structure-function relationships of the dna polymerase alpha-associated zinc-finger protein using computational approaches. In: Altman R, Dunker A, Hunter L, Klein T, Lauderdale K, eds. Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Singapore: World Scientific Press. pp 179-189.
10. Simons K, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. 1999a. Ab initio structure prediction of CASP3 targets using ROSETTA. Proteins Struct Funct Genet S3:171-176.
11. Simons K, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox B, Bystroff C, Baker D. 1999b. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 34:82-95.
12. Subramaniam S, Tcheng DK, Fenton J. 1996. A knowledge-based method for protein structure refinement and prediction. In: States D, Agarwal P, Gaasterland T, Hunter L, Smith R, eds. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press, pp 218-229.
13. Wang Y, Zhang H, Scott R. 1995. Discriminating compact non-native structures from the native structure of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:709-713.
14. Wei L, Huang E, Altman R. 1999. Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites? Structure 7:643-650.