Leading via Teacher Evaluation: The Case of the Missing Clothes?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 349-354

  Murphy, Joseph ^a   Hallinger, Philip ^b   Heck, Ronald H ^c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

administration; descriptive analysis; educational reform; evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882947265     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X13499625     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baker E. L.,Barton P. E.,Darling-Hammond L.,Haertel E.,Ladd H. F.,Linn R. L.,Shepard L. A.Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; 2010:.
2. Blase J.,Kirby P.Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin; 2009:.
3. Borman G. D.National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications.Review of Research in Education. 2005;29:1-27.
4. Bossert S.,Dwyer D.,Rowan B.,Lee G.The instructional management role of the principal.Educational Administration Quarterly. 1982;18 (3): 34-64.
5. Bryk A.,Sebring P.,Allensworth E.,Luppescu S.,Easton J.Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2010:.
6. Castetter W. B.The personnel function in educational administration. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1976:.
7. Clotfelter C. T.,Ladd H. F.,Vigdor J.Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers.Economics of Education Review. 2005;24:377-392.
8. Crosnoe R.Fitting in, standing out: Navigating the social challenges of high school to get an education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011:.
9. Crum K. S.,Sherman W. H.Facilitating high achievement: High school principals' reflections on their successful leadership practices.Journal of Educational Administration. 2008;46:562-580.
10. Curry M.Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform.Teachers College Record. 2008;110:733-774.
11. Danielson C.Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. 2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2007:.
12. Darling-Hammond L.,Amrein-Beardsley A.,Haertel E.,Rothstein J.Evaluating teacher evaluation.Phi Delta Kappan. 2012;93 (6): 8-15.
13. Friedkin N. E.,Slater M. R.School leadership and performance: A social network approach.Sociology of Education. 1994;67:139-157.
14. Gates Foundation. (2013). Measures of effective teaching (MET). Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/united-states/Pages/measures-of-effective-teaching-fact-sheet.aspx.
15. Goldstein J.Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2004;26:173-197.
16. Grubb W. N.,Flessa J. J."A job too big for one": Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2006;42:518-550.
17. Hamilton L. S.,Stecher B. M.,Russell J. L.,Marsh J. A.,Miles J.Strong states, weak schools: The benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability. Fuller B.Henne M. K.Hannum E., ed. St. Louis, MO: Emerald Group; 2008:31-66.
18. Harris D. N.,Herrington C. D.Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half century.American Journal of Education. 2006;112:209-238.
19. Hattie J. A. C.Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon, UK: Routledge; 2009:.
20. Herman R.,Stringfield S.Ten promising programs for educating all children: Evidence of impact. Arlington, VA: Education Research Service; 1997:.
21. Kimball S.,Milanowski A. T.Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision making within a standards-based evaluation system.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2009;45:34-70.
22. Kimball S. M.,White B.,Milanowski A. T.,Borman G.Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79 (4): 54-78.
23. Lachat M. A.,Smith S.Practices that support data use in urban high schools.Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 2005;10:333-349.
24. Leithwood K.,Jantzi D.A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005.Leadership and Policy in Schools. 2005;4:177-199.
25. Leithwood K.,Harris A.,Strauss T.Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010:.
26. Lewis A.Add it up: Using research to improve education and minority students. Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council; 2008:.
27. Lipham J.Organizational character of education: Administrative behavior.Review of Educational Research. 1964;34:435-454.
28. Lortie D.School-teacher: A sociology study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1975:.
29. Louis K. S.,Dretzke B.,Wahlstrom K.How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey.School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2010;21:315-336.
30. LouisK. S.LeithwoodK.WahlstromK. L.AndersonS. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. University of Minnesota, USA. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/carei/Leadership/Learning-from-Leadership_Final-Research-Report_July-2010.pdf.
31. May H.,Supovitz J. A.The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2011;47:332-352.
32. McCaffrey D. L.,Sass T. R.,Lockwood J. R.,Mihaly K.The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates.Education Finance and Policy. 2009;4:572-606.
33. Messick S.The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments.Educational Researcher. 1994;23:13-23.
34. Meyer J. W.,Rowan B. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association; 1975San Francisco; 1975.
35. Milanowski A.The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79 (4): 33-53.
36. Murphy J.Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on the school. Lotto L. S.Thurston P. W., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1990:.
37. Murphy J.Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Teachers College Press; 1991:.
38. Murphy J.The educator's handbook for understanding and closing achievement gaps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin; 2010:.
39. Murphy J.Homeschooling in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin; 2012:.
40. Powell Douglas R.How schools support families: Critical policy tensions.Elementary School Journal. 1991;91:307-319.
41. Printy S. M.Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2008;44:187-226.
42. Reyes P.,Scribner J.,Scribner A.Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 1999:.
43. Rivkin S. G.,Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.Econometrica. 2005;73:417-58.
44. Rockoff J.,Speroni C.Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness.American Economic Review. 2010;100:261-266.
45. RothsteinJ. (2009, January). Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables (NBER Working Paper, 14666). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14666.
46. Sanders W.,Ashton J.,Wright S.Comparison of the Effects of NBPTS-certified teachers with other teachers on the rate of student academic progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and National Science Foundation; 2005:.
47. Sanders W.,Rivers J.Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center; 1996:.
48. Sebastian J.,Allensworth E.The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2012;48:626-663.
49. Seidel T.,Shavelson R. J.Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis research.Review of Educational Research. 2007;77:454-499.
50. Supovitz J.Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform. Mangin M. M.Stoelinga S. R., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2008:144-162.
51. Supovitz J. A.,Klein V.Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education; 2003:.
52. Supovitz J.,Sirinides P.,May H.How principals and peers influence teaching and learning.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2009;46:31-56.
53. Taylor E. S.,Tyler J. H.Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011:.
54. Teddlie C.,Reynolds D.The international handbook of school effectiveness research. New York, NY: Falmer Press; 2000:.
55. Thompson VictorModern organization. New York, NY: Knopf; 1961:.
56. Wahlstrom K. L.,Louis K. S.How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2008;44:458-495.
57. Weis L.Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York, NY: Routledge; 1990:.
58. Wenger E.Communities of practice and social learning systems.Organization. 2000;7:225-246.
59. Witziers B.,Bosker R. J.,Kruger M. L.Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2003;39:398-425.
60. Wright S.,Horn S.,Sanders P.Classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 1997;11:57-67.