The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from cincinnati

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 33-53

  Milanowski, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846676338     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje7904_3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478–494.
2. Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures or employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48, 587–605.
3. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 285–328.
6. Fritsche, L., Weerasinghe, D., & Babu, S. (2003, April). Making the connection: Linking the teacher evaluation results to the district accountability system. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, Chicago.
7. Heneman, R. L. (1986). The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 811–826.
8. Hoaglin, D. C. (1983). Letter values: A set of selected order statistics. In D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. W. Tukey (Eds.), Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis (pp. 33–55). New York: Wiley.
9. Holtzapple, E. (2002, November). Validating a teacher evaluation system. Paper presented at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Washington, DC.
10. Kellor, E., & Odden, A. (2000). How Cincinnati developed a knowledge and skill-based salary schedule. Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/cpre/papers/
11. Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1987). The accuracy of principals’ judgments of teacher performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 80, 242–247.
12. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Lynn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
13. Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G., III. (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 193–212.
14. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Odden, A., Borman, G., & Fermanich, M. (2004). Assessing teacher, classroom, and school effects, including fiscal effects. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 4–32.
16. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (2001). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18. Porter, A. C., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259–297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3–44). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261–281). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Stiggens, R. J., & Duke, D. (1988) The case for commitment to teacher growth: Research on teacher evaluation. Albany: State University of New York Press.