Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in washoe county

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 54-78

  Kimball, Steven M ^a   White, Brad ^a   Milanowski, Anthony T ^a   Borman, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27644509033     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje7904_4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Charlton, K., & Melson, A. (2003). The effects of modified school calendars on student achievement and on school and community attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 73, 1–52.
2. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Davis, D. R., Pool, J. E., & Mits-Cash, M. (2000). Issues in implementing a new teacher assessment system in a large urban school district: Results of a qualitative field study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 285–306.
5. Gallagher, H. A. (2004/this issue). Vaughn Elementary’s innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement? Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 79–107.
6. Kimball, S. M. (2001). Innovations in teacher evaluation: Case studies of two school districts with teacher evaluation systems based on the framework for teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertations Publishing.
7. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 241–268.
8. La Marca, P. M. (1999). Results of statewide TerraNova testing, fall 1998 (Prepared for Nevada Proficiency Examination program). Carson City, NV: Nevada Department of Education.
9. Milanowski, A. (2004/this issue). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33–53.
10. Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H. G., III. (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 193–212.
11. Odden, A. R. (2003). An early assessment of comprehensive teacher compensation change plans. In M. L. Plecki & D. H. Monk (Vol. Eds.), Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association 2003: School finance and teacher quality: Exploring the connections (pp. 209–228). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
12. Odden, A., Borman, G., & Fermanich, M. (2004/this issue). Assessing teacher, classroom, and school effects, including fiscal effects. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 4–32.
13. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, S., Cheong, U. F., & Congdon, R. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
15. Sawyer, L. (2001). Revamping a teacher evaluation system. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 44–47.
16. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.
18. Washoe County School District. (2003). Fast facts. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from www.washoe.k12.nv.us/district/facts