National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications

Review of Research in Education

Volumn 29, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-27

  Borman, Geoffrey D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645767465     PISSN: 0091732X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0091732X029001001     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. Future of Children, 5(3), 25-50.
2. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 8. Implementing and sustaining innovation, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
3. Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Stecher, B. M. (Eds.). (1999). Class-size reduction in California: Early evaluation findings, 1996-1998. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
4. Borman, G. D. (2000). Title I: The evolving research base. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5, 27-45.
5. Borman, G. D. (2003). Experiments for educational evaluation and improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(4), 7-27.
6. Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 309-326.
7. Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. V. (2001). Title I and student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. In G. D. Borman, S. C. Stringfield, & R. E. Slavin (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 25-58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Borman, G. D., D'Agostino, J. V., Wong, K. K., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). The longitudinal achievement of Chapter 1 students: Preliminary evidence from the Prospects study. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 3, 363-399.
9. Borman, G. D., & Hewes, G. M. (2003). The long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of Success for All. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 243-267.
10. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125-230.
11. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409-429.
12. Cohen, D. K. (1982). Policy and organization: The impact of state and federal education policy on school governance. Harvard Educational Review, 52, 474-499.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Comer, J. P. (1988). Educating poor minority children. Scientific American, 259(5), 42-48.
15. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Cook, T. D., Habib, F. N., Phillips, M., Settersten, R. A., Shagle, S. C., & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (1999). Comer's School Development Program in Prince George's County, Maryland: A theory based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 543-597.
17. Cook, T. D., Hunt, H. D., & Murphy, R. F. (2000). Comer's School Development Program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 535-597.
18. Cook, T. D., & Payne, M. R. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 150-178). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19. Cooper, H. (1981). On the effects of significance and the significance of effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1013-1018.
20. Crandall, D. P., Loucks-Horsley, S., Baucher, J. E., Schmidt, W. B., Eiseman, J. W., Cox, P. L., et al. (1982). Peoples, policies, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement (Vols. 1-10). Andover, MA: The NETWORK.
21. Crawford, D. B., & Snider, V. E. (2000). Effective mathematics instruction: The importance of curriculum. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 122-142.
22. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., et al. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: A study of the implementation and effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence. Elementary School Journal, 101, 167-192.
24. Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5, 183-204.
25. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24.
26. Epstein, A. S. (1993). Training for quality: Improving early childhood programs through systematic inservice training. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
27. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-109.
28. Fullan, M. G., with S. Stiegelbauer. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Gilbert, J., McPeek, B., & Mosteller, F. (1977). Statistics and ethics in surgery and anesthesia. Science, 198, 684-689.
30. Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1977). "Pullout" in compensatory education. Boulder: University of Colorado, Laboratory of Educational Research.
31. Grissmer, D. W., Kirby, S. N., Berends, M., & Williamson, S. (1994). Student achievement and the changing American family. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
32. Grossen, B., & Ewing, S. (1994). Raising mathematics problem-solving performance: Do the NCTM teaching standards help? Effective School Practices, 13, 79-91.
33. Hawkridge, D. G., Campeau, P. L., DeWitt, K. M., & Trickett, P. K. (1969). A study of further selected exemplary programs for the education of disadvantaged children. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
34. Hawkridge, D. G., Chalupsky, A. B., & Roberts, A. O. H. (1968). A study of selected exemplary programs for the education of disadvantaged children. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
35. Haynes, N., Emmons, C., & Woodruff, D. (1998). School Development Program effects: Linking implementation to outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 3, 71-86.
36. Herrington, C. D., & Orland, M. E. (1992). Politics and federal aid to urban school systems: The case of Chapter 1. In J. Cibulka, R. Reed, & K. Wong (Eds.), The politics of urban education in the United States (pp. 167-179). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
37. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1995). Core Knowledge Sequence. Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.
38. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1996). The schools we need. New York: Doubleday.
39. Jeffrey, J. R. (1978). Education for children of the poor: A study of the origins and implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
40. Kagan, S. L. (1991). Excellence in early childhood education: Defining characteristics and next-decade strategies. In S. L. Kagan (Ed.), The care and education of America's young children: Obstacles and opportunities (90th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 237-258). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
41. Kearns, D., & Anderson, J. (1996). Sharing the vision: Creating New American Schools. In S. Stringfield, S. Ross, & L. Smith (Eds.), Bold plans for school restructuring (pp. 9-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Kirst, M., & Jung, R. (1982). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen-year review of Title I, ESEA. In W. Williams, R. F. Elmore, J. S. Hall, R. Jung, M. Kirst, S. A. MacManus, et al. (Eds.), Studying implementation (pp. 119-148). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
43. Levin, H. M. (1995). Cost-effectiveness analysis. In M. Carnoy (Ed.), International encyclopedia of economics of education (2nd ed., pp. 381-386). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
44. Levin, H. M. (2002). The cost effectiveness of whole school reforms. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
45. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
46. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Implementation of ESEA Title I: A problem of compliance. Teachers College Record, 77, 397-415.
48. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1986). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 186-201.
49. Murphy, J., & Beck, L. (1995). School-based management as school reform: Taking stock. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
50. Odden, A., & Archibald, S. (2000). Reallocating resources: How to boost student achievement without asking for more. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
51. Ogletree, E. J. (1976). A comparative study of the effectiveness of DISTAR and eclectic reading methods for inner-city children. Chicago: Chicago State University.
52. Peterson, P. E., Rabe, B. G., & Wong, K. W. (1986). When federalism works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
53. Pogrow, S. (2000). Success for All does not produce success for students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 1, 67-81.
54. Puma, M. J., Karweit, N., Price, C., Ricciuti, A., Thompson, W., & Vaden-Kiernan, M. (1997). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
55. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest - A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2339-2346.
56. Richardson, E., Dibenedetto, B., Christ, A., Press, M., & Winsbert, B. (1978). An assessment of two methods for remediating reading deficiencies. Reading Improvement, 15(2), 82-95.
57. Rotberg, I. C., Harvey, J., & Warner, K. E. (1993). Federal policy options for improving the education of low-income students: Vol. 1. Findings and recommendations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
58. Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 353-389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
59. Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
60. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2001). One million children: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
61. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., Wasik, B. A., Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. M. (1994). 'Whenever and wherever we choose': The replication of 'Success for All.' Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 639-647.
62. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (1990 Politics of Education Association Yearbook, pp. 233-267). London: Taylor & Francis.
63. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., Yoder, N., Schaffer, E., Nesselrodt, P., Gamse, B., et al. (1997). Special strategies studies final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
64. Tallmadge, G. K., & Wood, C. T. (1981). User's guide to the ESEA Title I evaluation and reporting system. Mountain View, CA: RMC Research.
65. Tarkington, S. A. (1989). Improving critical thinking skills using Paideia seminars in a seventh-grade literature curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.
66. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
67. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) program guidance. Retrieved March 17, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/ compreform/chiefltr.html
68. Walberg, H., & Greenberg, R. (1999). The Diogenes factor. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 127-128.
69. Wargo, M. J., Campeau, P. L., & Tallmadge, G. K. (1971). Further examination of exemplary programs for educating disadvantaged children. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
70. Wong, K. K., & Meyer, S. J. (1998). Title I schoolwide programs: A synthesis of findings from recent evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 115-136.
71. Wong, K., & Meyer, S. (2001). Title I schoolwide programs as an alternative to categorical practices: An organizational analysis of surveys from the Prospects study. In G. D. Borman, S. C. Stringfield, & R. E. Slavin (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 195-234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.