Practices that support data use in urban high schools

Transforming Data Into Knowledge: Applications of Data-based Decision Making To Improve Instructional Practice: A Special Issue of the journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2024, Pages 333-349

  Lachat, Mary Ann ^a   Smith, Stephen ^a  

^a Center for Resource Management Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203608983     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. American Association of School Administrators. (2002). Using data to improve schools: What's working. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.aasa.org/cas/UsingDataToImprove Schools.pdf
2. Armstrong, J., & Anthes, K. (2001). How data can help: Putting information to work to raise student achievement. American School Board Journal, 755(11), 38-41.
3. Bernhardt, V. L. (1998). The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for school improvement (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
4. Bernhardt, V. L. (2000a). Databases can help teachers with standards implementation. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.educationadvisor.info/documents/OCIO2001/Databases CanHelp.pdf
5. Bernhardt, V. L. (2000b). Intersections. Journal of Staff Development, 21(1), 33-36.
6. Brimijoin, K., Marquissee, E., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Using data to differentiate instruction. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 70-73.
7. Center for Collaborative Education. (2002, April). The role of external facilitators in whole school reform: Teachers' perceptions of how coaches influence school change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
8. Center for Collaborative Education. (2003). The challenge of coaching: Providing cohesion among multiple reform agendas. Boston: Author. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www. ccebos.org/coaching_challenge.2004.pdf
9. Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a climate of learning and achievement in elementary schools. London: Falmer.
10. Cizek, G. J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(2), 16-33.
11. Codding, J. B., & Rothman, R. (1999). Just passing through: The life of an American high school. In D. D. Marsh & J. B. Codding (Eds.), The new American high school (pp. 3-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
12. Cromey, A. (2000). Using student assessment data: What can we learn from schools? Policy Issues, 6. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory Web site: http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/html/pivol6/nov2000.htm
13. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003-1024). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. Feldman, J., & Tung, R. (2001). Using data-based inquiry and decision making to improve instruction. ERS Spectrum, 19(3), 10-19.
15. Greene, T. (2004, July). Literature review for school-based staff developers and coaches. Oxford, OH: National School Development Council. Retrieved April 29, 2005 from http://www.nsdc.org/li- brary/schoolbasedlitreview.pdf
16. Holcomb, E. L. (1999). Getting excited about data: How to combine people, passion, and proof. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
17. Holcomb, E. L. (2001). Asking the right questions: Techniques for collaboration and school change (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
18. Johnson, R. (1996). Setting our sights: Measuring equity in school change. Los Angeles: The Achievement Council.
19. Johnson, R. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20. Keeney, L. (1998, May). Using data for school improvement. In Tools for Accountability Project, Report on the Second Practitioners' Conference for Annenberg Challenge Sites, Houston, TX. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from Brown University, Annenberg Institute for School Reform Web site: http:www.annenberginstitute.org/images/using_data4.pdf
21. Kennedy, E. (2003). Raising test scores for all students: An administrator's guide to improving standardized test performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
22. Killion, J., & Bellamy, G. T. (2000). On the job: Data analysts focus school improvement efforts. Journal of Staff Development, 21(Y), 27-31.
23. Lachat, M. (2002). Data-driven high school reform: The breaking ranks model. Providence, RI: Brown University, Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory.
24. Lachat, M., & Williams, M. (2003). Putting student performance data at the center of school reform. In J. DiMartino, J. Clark, & D. Wolk (Eds.), Personalized learning (pp. 210-228). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
25. Love, N. (2000). Using data, getting results: Collaborative inquiry for school-based mathematics and science reform. Cambridge, MA: Regional Alliance at TERC.
26. Marzano, R. J. (2003). Using data: Two wrongs and a right. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 56-60.
27. Mason, S. (2002, April). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools (WCER Working Paper No. 2002-3). Retrieved November 30, 2004, from University of Wisconsin, School of Education, Wisconsin Center for Education Research Web site: http://www.wcer.wisc. edu/publications/workingpaper/paper/Working_Paper_No_2002_3.pdf
28. National Education Association Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (2003). Using data about classroom practice and student work to improve professional development for educators. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.nfie.org/publications/usingdataIB.pdf
29. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2003). Painting by number: Using data to create a portrait of school improvement. In NCREL's Learning Point. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/info/nlp/lpf03/paint.htm
30. Olson, L. (2002, June 12). Schools discovering riches in data. Education Week on the Web. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2002/06/12/40data.h21.html? querystring=schools%20discovering%20riches%20in%20data%202002
31. Pardini, P. (2000). Data, well done: Six examples of data-driven decision making at work. Journal of Staff Development, 21(1), 12-18.
32. Protheroe, N. (2001). Improving teaching and learning with data-based decisions: Asking the right questions and acting on the answers. Educational Research Service Spectrum, 19(3). Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.ers.org/spectrum/sum01a.htm
33. Rallis, S. E, & MacMullen, M. M. (2000). Inquiry-minded schools: Opening doors for accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 766-773.
34. RAND Corporation. (2002). A decade of whole-school reform: The New American Schools experience. Santa Monica, CA: Author
35. Rudner, L. M., & Boston, C. (2003). Data warehousing: Beyond disaggregation. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 62-65.
36. Schmöker, M. (2003). First things first: Demystifying data analysis. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 22-24.
37. Schwartz, W. (2002). Data-driven equity in urban schools. (ERIC Digest). Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-2/data.html
38. Streifer, R A. (2002, July). Data-driven decision-making: What is knowable for school improvement. Paper presented at the National Center on Education Statistics (NCES) Summer Data Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.edsmartinc.com/ whitepapers/what_is_knowable.doc
39. Thom, C. A. (2001). Knowledge management for educational information systems: What is the state of the field? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(41), 1-31. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n47/
40. Visher, M. G., & Hudis, P. M. (1999). Aiming high: Strategies to promote high standards in high schools [Interim report]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
41. Wade, H. H. (2001). Data inquiry and analysis for educational reform. (ERIC Digest). Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2002-4/data-inquiry.html
42. Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2003, October). Teacher-friendly options to improve teaching through student data analysis. Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the American Association for Teaching and Curriculum, Baltimore. Retrieved November 30,2004, from http://www.csos.jhu.edu/ systemics/datause/papers/AATC_Teacher-Friendly_Software.pdf
43. Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through analysis of student data (Report No. 67). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.