Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 558-563

  Nemeth, Gabor ^a   Hassan, Ziad ^a   Csutak, Adrienne ^a   Szalai, Eszter ^a   Berta, Andras ^a   Modis Jr , Laszlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CORNEA BIOMECHANICAL MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882332493     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-06     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Soergel F, Jean B, Seiler T, et al. Dynamic mechanical spectroscopy of the cornea for measurement of its viscoelastic properties in vitro. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995;4:151-156.
2. Kynigopoulos M, Schlote T, Kotecha A, Tzamalis A, Pajic B, Haefliger I. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008;225:357-360.
3. Moreno-Montanes J, Maldonado MJ, Garcia N, Mendiluce L, Garcia-Gomez PJ, Segui-Gomez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:968-974.
4. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39-47.
5. Spoerl E, Terai N, Haustein M, Bohm AG, Raiskup-Wolf F, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes [article in German]. Ophthalmologe. 2009;106:512-520.
6. Chen S, Chen D, Wang J, Lu F, Wang Q, Qu J. Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:279-288.
7. Ayala M. Corneal hysteresis in normal subjects and in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 2011;46:187-191.
8. Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21:138-148.
9. Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1-year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cornea. 2012;31:21-25.
10. Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:452-457.
11. Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:840-849.
12. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
13. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3026-3031.
14. Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, Gatinel D. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2912-2916.
15. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research; Applications to Practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000:557-584.
16. Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:1491-1494.
17. Gkika M, Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Koutsogianni A, Kozobolis V. Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:565-573.
18. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical char acteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3852-3857.
19. Franco S, Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92:469-475.
20. Shen M, Wang J, Qu J, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1185-1192.
21. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5337-5347.
22. Foster PJ, Broadway DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in an adult British population: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8179-8185.
23. Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371-1375.
24. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:616-622.
25. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:990-992.
26. Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:553-562.
27. Ryan DS, Coe CD, Howard RS, Edwards JD, Bower KS. Corneal biomechanics following epi-LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:458-464.
28. de Freitas Valbon B, Ventura MP, da Silva RS, Canedo AL, Velarde GC, Ambrósio R Jr. Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:215-219.
29. Lanchares E, del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Lavilla L, Calvo B. Biomechanical property analysis after corneal collagen crosslinking in relation to ultraviolet A irradiation time. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1223-1227.
30. Wolffsohn JS, Safeen S, Shah S, Laiquzzaman M. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus. Cornea. 2012;31:849-854.
31. Galletti JG, Pförtner T, Bonthoux FF. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:202-208.
32. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:209-215.
33. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:673-679.