Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1185-1192

  Shen, Meixiao ^a,b   Wang, Jianhua ^c   Qu, Jia ^a,b   Xu, Suzhong ^a,b   Wang, Xiaoxing ^a,b   Fang, Haizhen ^a,b   Lu, Fan ^a,b,c  

^a WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING HOSPITAL   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diurnal; Hysteresis; IOP; Optical coherence tomography; Thickness

Indexed keywords

BASELINE VALUES; BEFORE AND AFTER; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL THICKNESS; DIURNAL; DIURNAL CHANGES; DIURNAL FLUCTUATIONS; DIURNAL VARIATION; INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE; IOP; MEAN AGES; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REPEATED MEASUREMENTS; RESISTANCE FACTORS; RETINAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RIGHT AND LEFT; THICKNESS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); BIOMECHANICS; HYSTERESIS; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SLEEP RESEARCH; TOMOGRAPHY;

COHERENT LIGHT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SLEEP; ASIAN; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISUAL ADAPTATION; WAKEFULNESS;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BIOMECHANICS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CORNEA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; REACTION TIME; RETINA; SLEEP; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; WAKEFULNESS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59849103667     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8abe     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4422-6.
2. Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea 2001;20:480-3.
3. Shah S, Spedding C, Bhojwani R, Kwartz J, Henson D, McLeod D. Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1191-3.
4. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:114-8.
5. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3790-4.
6. BhanA,Browning AC, ShahS, HamiltonR,Dave D, Dua HS. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389-92.
7. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55.
8. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:156-62.
9. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-75.
10. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026-31.
11. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:39-47.
12. Gatinel D, Chaabouni S, Adam PA, Munck J, Puech M, Hoang-Xuan T. Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap. J Refract Surg 2007;23: 76-84.
13. Lu F, Xu S, QuJ,ShenM, Wang X, Fang H, WangJ.Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143: 616-22.
14. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Huang D, Schuman JS, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:1584-9.
15. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1070-4.
16. Maldonado MJ, Ruiz-Oblitas L, Munuera JM, Aliseda D, Garcia-Layana A, Moreno-Montanes J. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology 2000;107:81-7.
17. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1791-5.
18. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L. Relation between optical coherence tomography and optical pachymetry measurements of corneal swelling induced by hypoxia. Am JOphthalmol 2002;134:93-8.
19. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408.
20. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Aggarwala S, Evian S, Khosla J, Perera R. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann appla-nation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007;16:29-35.
21. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma 2007;16:153-8.
22. Hamilton K, Pye D, Hua S, Yu F, Chung J, Hou Q. The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonom-etry in a mature population. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1636-8.
23. Luce D. Methodology for cornea compensated IOP and corneal resistance factor for the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:E-abstract 2266.
24. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337-47.
25. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L. The measurement of corneal epithelial thickness in response to hypoxia using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:315-9.
26. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Sorbara L, Kort R, Jones L. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse-geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4742-6.
27. Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, Rollins A. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1812-6.
28. Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24:211-9.