Central corneal thickness and biomechanical changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 215-219

  De Freitas Valbon, Bruno ^a   Ventura, Marcelo Palis ^a   Da Silva, Renata Siqueira ^b   Canedo, Ana Laura ^c   Velarde, Guillermo Coca ^a   Ambrósio Jr , Renato ^c,d  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b Glaucoma and Cataract Sector   (Brazil)

^c Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrosio   (Brazil)

^d Member of the Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OCULAR BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTY; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLIT LAMP; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSEUDOPHAKIA;

EID: 84857844356     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20111103-02     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
2. Kucumen RB, Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2096-2098.
3. Del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3199-3202.
4. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(5):361-365.
5. Dayanir V, Ozcura F, Kir E, Topaloglu A, Ozkan SB, Aktunç T. Medical control of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(3):484-488. (Pubitemid 40469799)
6. Chan FM, Mathur R, Ku JJ, et al. Short-term outcomes in eyes with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(3):537-554.
7. Hayreh SS. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. IV. Occurrence after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(8):1410-1416. (Pubitemid 10055974)
8. Savage JA, Thomas JV, Belcher CD III, Simmons RJ. Extra-capsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(11):1506-1516. (Pubitemid 16203712)
9. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(5):364-370. (Pubitemid 44434988)
10. Shah S, Laiquzzman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3026-3031. (Pubitemid 351261143)
11. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123(6):767-772. (Pubitemid 27250923)
12. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53(1):34-43.
13. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(5):592-596. (Pubitemid 23137642)
14. Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76(3):319-324. (Pubitemid 28327588)
15. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(1):85-87. (Pubitemid 32060201)
16. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pürsten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):471-476.
17. Hagerb A, Dave H, Wiegand W. Corneal pachymetry and intraocular pressure. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk. 2005;222(7):558-567. (Pubitemid 41158990)
18. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):146-155. (Pubitemid 40260702)
19. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(5):337-343. (Pubitemid 41383325)
20. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1-30. (Pubitemid 23234285)
21. Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(3):341-346. (Pubitemid 47331402)