Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in an adult British population: The EPIC-Norfolk eye study

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 8179-8185

  Foster, Paul J ^a   Broadway, David C ^b   Garway Heath, David F ^a   Yip, Jennifer L Y ^c   Luben, Robert ^c   Hayat, Shabina ^c   Dalzell, Nichola ^c   Wareham, Nicholas J ^d   Khaw, Kay Tee ^c  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKER; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELASTICITY; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORNEA; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84855368623     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7853     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Wu S, et al. Risk factors for open angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 918-924.
2. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48-56.
3. Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings RA. Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in openangle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1651-1657.
4. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82: 844-851.
5. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma among white and black Americans: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1090-1095.
6. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intraocular pressure, glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966; 50:570-586.
7. Perkins ES. The Bedford glaucoma survery. II. Rescreening of normal population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57:186-192.
8. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1-30.
9. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 1975;53:34-43.
10. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. J Math Biol. 1999;61:551-572.
11. Argus WA. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1810-1812.
12. Purslow PP, Karwatowski WSS. Ocular elasticity: is engineering stiffness a more useful characterization parameter than ocular rigidity? Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1686-1692.
13. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
14. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, et al. Corneal thickness-and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 5337-5347.
15. Wu S-Y, Leske MC. Associations with intraocular pressure in the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1572-1576.
16. Klein BE, Klein R. Intraocular pressure and cardiovascular risk variables. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:837-839.
17. Foster PJ, Machin D, Wong TY, et al. Determinants of intraocular pressure and its association with glaucomatous optic neuropathy in Chinese Singaporeans: the Tanjong Pagar Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3885-3891.
18. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Wu S-Y, et al. Distribution of intraocular pressure: the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115: 1051-1057.
19. Topouzis F, Wilson MR, Harris A, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Greece: the Thessaloniki Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:511-519.
20. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marrafa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population: the Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:209-215.
21. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:969-973.
22. Kawase K, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Ocular and systemic factors related to intraocular pressure in Japanese adults: the Tajimi study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:1175-1179.
23. Riboli E. Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann Oncol. 1992;2:783-791.
24. Day NE, Oakes S, Lubin R, et al. EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort: European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:95-103.
25. McFadden E, Luben R, Wareham N, et al. Occupational social class, educational level, smoking and body mass index, and cause-specific mortality in men and women: a prospective study in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23:511-522.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i: 307-310.
27. El Sheikh A, Alhasso D, Kotecha A, Garway-Heath DF. Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as a tool for intraocular pressure measurement. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131:081010-1-081010-9.
28. Sprosten K, Primatesta P. Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease. Health Survey for England 2003. Vol. 2. London: HMSO; 2004.
29. Graham PA, Hollows FC. Sources of variation in tonometry. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1964;84:597-613.
30. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukuhara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan: a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133-155.
31. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17-21.
32. Nomura H, Shimokata H, Ando F, et al. Age-related changes in intraocular pressure in a large Japanese population: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2016-2022.
33. Dielemans I, de Jong PT, Stolk R, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure, and diabetes mellitus in the general elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:1271-1275.
34. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2224-2228.
35. Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD. Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure: longitudinal perspective-the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:284-287.
36. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. Hypertension, perfusion pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:216-221.
37. Duggal P, Klein AP, Lee KE, et al. Identification of novel genetic loci for intraocular pressure: a genomewide scan of the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:74-79.
38. Leske MC, Podger MJ. Intraocular pressure: cardiovascular risk variables and visual field defects. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:280-287.
39. Yip JLY, Aung T, Wong TY, et al. Socioeconomic status, systolic blood pressure and intraocular pressure: the Tanjong Pagar Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:56-61.
40. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:730-737.
41. Mangouritsas G, Morphis G, Mourtzoukos S, Feretis E. Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87: 901-905.
42. Ang GS, Bochmann F, Townend J, Azuara-Blanco A. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:259-262.
43. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, et al. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3262-3268.
44. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Rama P, et al. Experimental assessment of human corneal hysteresis. Curr Eye Res. 2008;33:205-213.
45. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32:11-19.
46. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3852-3857.
47. Song Y, Congdon N, Li L, et al. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:819-826.
48. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:1061-1066.
49. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:888-893.