Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 225, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 357-360

  Kynigopoulos, Myron ^a   Schlote, T ^a   Kotecha, A ^b   Tzamalis, A ^a   Pajic, B ^a   Haefliger, I ^c  

^a Klinik Pallas   (Switzerland)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY EYE CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Corneal compensated IOP; Corneal hysteresis; Corneal resistance factor; Ocular response analyzer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 47649131247     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027256     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S et al. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1389-1392
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error. BMJ 1996; 313: 744
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ 1996; 313: 106
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistic notes: Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ 1996; 313: 41-42
5. Collaborative Normal-Tension Galucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126: 487-497
6. Collaborative Normal-Tension Galucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126: 498-505
7. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 868-875
8. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994; 232: 141-144
9. Ehlers N. On corneal thickness and intraocular pressure. II. A clinical study on the thickness of the corneal stroma in glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1970; 48: 1107-1112
10. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD et al. The Oculat Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714-720
11. Gunvant P, ÒLeary DJ, Baskaran M et al. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 337-343
12. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M et al. The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104: 484-489
13. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 701-713
14. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5337-5347
15. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1572-1575
16. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 48-56
17. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 146-155
18. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyser. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156-162
19. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyser. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 364-370
20. Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 1980; 24: 211-219
21. Srodtmeister R, Kron M, Graus W. IOP measurement and central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 120-121
22. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993; 38: 1-30
23. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 590-596
24. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123: 767-772